Catastrophic and Socioeconomic Disparities Across Different Payment Schemes in Lung Cancer Treatment: A Cross-Sectional Single-Centre Analysis from Thailand

Sarayut Lucien Geater, P. Thongsuksai
{"title":"Catastrophic and Socioeconomic Disparities Across Different Payment Schemes in Lung Cancer Treatment: A Cross-Sectional Single-Centre Analysis from Thailand","authors":"Sarayut Lucien Geater, P. Thongsuksai","doi":"10.31584/jhsmr.2023921","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To identify the magnitude of catastrophic health expenditure (CHE) and medical impoverishment across three payment schemes and compare the within-scheme financial disparity. Material and Methods: A cross-sectional analysis of CHE and medical impoverishment among lung cancer patients was conducted at a university hospital in Thailand. A total of 367 lung cancer patients drawn from three payment schemes were included. The clinical data were collected from the hospital’s Electronic Medical Records, while the socioeconomic data, including cost details, were collected via an interview-based questionnaire from November 2020 to June 2022. Economic analyses were performed using concentration curves and logistic regression modeling. Results: There were 38%, 21% and 27% impoverished patients belonging to the Universal Coverage Scheme (UCS), Social Security Scheme (SSS) and Civil Servant Medical Benefit Scheme (CSMBS), respectively, and approximately further 30% in each scheme became impoverished owing to medical-related expenses. Socioeconomic disparities in CHE; concentration index; CI=-0.36 UCS, -0.59 CSMBS and -0.47 UCS, and medical impoverishment; CI=0.16 UCS, -0.15 CSMBS and 0.10 UCS, were evident in all schemes. These inequities were more pronounced among CSMBS patients. Moreover, if not impoverished already, the probability of medical impoverishment in all payment schemes peaked in the middle quintile and declined thereafter. Conclusion: Across all payment schemes, CHE and medical impoverishment occurred at rates of around 60% and 30%, respectively, among lung cancer patients in Thailand. The gradient of CHE probability was more prominent among CSMBS patients.","PeriodicalId":36211,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Science and Medical Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Science and Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31584/jhsmr.2023921","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To identify the magnitude of catastrophic health expenditure (CHE) and medical impoverishment across three payment schemes and compare the within-scheme financial disparity. Material and Methods: A cross-sectional analysis of CHE and medical impoverishment among lung cancer patients was conducted at a university hospital in Thailand. A total of 367 lung cancer patients drawn from three payment schemes were included. The clinical data were collected from the hospital’s Electronic Medical Records, while the socioeconomic data, including cost details, were collected via an interview-based questionnaire from November 2020 to June 2022. Economic analyses were performed using concentration curves and logistic regression modeling. Results: There were 38%, 21% and 27% impoverished patients belonging to the Universal Coverage Scheme (UCS), Social Security Scheme (SSS) and Civil Servant Medical Benefit Scheme (CSMBS), respectively, and approximately further 30% in each scheme became impoverished owing to medical-related expenses. Socioeconomic disparities in CHE; concentration index; CI=-0.36 UCS, -0.59 CSMBS and -0.47 UCS, and medical impoverishment; CI=0.16 UCS, -0.15 CSMBS and 0.10 UCS, were evident in all schemes. These inequities were more pronounced among CSMBS patients. Moreover, if not impoverished already, the probability of medical impoverishment in all payment schemes peaked in the middle quintile and declined thereafter. Conclusion: Across all payment schemes, CHE and medical impoverishment occurred at rates of around 60% and 30%, respectively, among lung cancer patients in Thailand. The gradient of CHE probability was more prominent among CSMBS patients.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肺癌治疗中不同支付方案的灾难性和社会经济差异:来自泰国的横断面单中心分析
目的:确定三种支付计划中灾难性医疗支出(CHE)和医疗贫困的程度,并比较计划内的财政差异。材料和方法:在泰国一所大学医院对癌症患者的CHE和医疗贫困进行了横断面分析。共有367名癌症患者从三个支付计划中提取。临床数据是从医院的电子病历中收集的,而社会经济数据,包括成本细节,是通过2020年11月至2022年6月的访谈问卷收集的。使用浓度曲线和逻辑回归模型进行经济分析。结果:全民医保计划(UCS)、社会保障计划(SSS)和公务员医疗福利计划(CSMBS)分别有38%、21%和27%的贫困患者,每个计划中约有30%的患者因医疗相关费用而陷入贫困。CHE的社会经济差异;浓度指数;CI=-0.36 UCS、-0.59 CSMBS和-0.47 UCS,以及医疗贫困;CI=0.16 UCS、-0.15 CSMBS和0.10 UCS在所有方案中都很明显。这些不平等现象在CSMBS患者中更为明显。此外,如果不是已经贫困的话,所有支付计划中医疗贫困的概率在中间五分之一达到峰值,此后下降。结论:在所有支付方案中,泰国癌症患者的CHE和医疗贫困发生率分别约为60%和30%。CHE概率的梯度在CSMBS患者中更为显著。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Hospital Food Waste Trends: A Bibliometric Analysis Effectiveness of a Patient-Family-Shared Care Program on Delaying the Progression of Chronic Kidney Disease in Uncontrolled Type 2 Diabetic Patients: A Quasi-Experimental Study Association between Retinal Morphology and Visual Functions in Eyes with Typical Neovascular Age Related Macular Degeneration: A Pilot Study Association of Online Learning Tools and Students’ Health: A Case Study During the COVID-19 Pandemic Comparative Efficacy of Oxitard Capsules and Immusante Tablets in Early Stages of Oral Submucous Fibrosis - A Randomized Controlled Trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1