The Culture-Religion Nexus: (Neo-)Durkheimianism and Mediatized Confucianism in Korean "Piety Travel"

IF 0.1 3区 哲学 0 ASIAN STUDIES Journal of Korean Religions Pub Date : 2017-11-23 DOI:10.1353/JKR.2017.0014
Sam Han
{"title":"The Culture-Religion Nexus: (Neo-)Durkheimianism and Mediatized Confucianism in Korean \"Piety Travel\"","authors":"Sam Han","doi":"10.1353/JKR.2017.0014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This article aims to ask why there is an oft-made elision between culture and religion. It views Confucianism (and Confucian values) in Korea as an instance of this. Offering a critical re-reading of debates spurred by Durkheimian social science, it analyzes what I call the \"culture-religion\" nexus. In doing so, this article tries to suggest that prior concepts deployed to address this nexus—namely, \"popular religion\" and \"civil religion\"—may need to be rethought to consider the significance of media, and the symbolic structure that it facilitates in the crafting of individualized moral-meaning systems or codes. As a result, I suggest that religion and culture, both, operate within conditions whereby individuals do not passively receive doctrine but rather interpret and construct \"lifestyles.\" I demonstrate how this works through a media analysis of the recent trend of \"piety travel\" in South Korean television programming and its \"mediatization\" of Confucian values.","PeriodicalId":42017,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Korean Religions","volume":"8 1","pages":"116 - 91"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/JKR.2017.0014","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Korean Religions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/JKR.2017.0014","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ASIAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:This article aims to ask why there is an oft-made elision between culture and religion. It views Confucianism (and Confucian values) in Korea as an instance of this. Offering a critical re-reading of debates spurred by Durkheimian social science, it analyzes what I call the "culture-religion" nexus. In doing so, this article tries to suggest that prior concepts deployed to address this nexus—namely, "popular religion" and "civil religion"—may need to be rethought to consider the significance of media, and the symbolic structure that it facilitates in the crafting of individualized moral-meaning systems or codes. As a result, I suggest that religion and culture, both, operate within conditions whereby individuals do not passively receive doctrine but rather interpret and construct "lifestyles." I demonstrate how this works through a media analysis of the recent trend of "piety travel" in South Korean television programming and its "mediatization" of Confucian values.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
文化-宗教关系:(新)涂尔干主义与韩国“孝行”中的中介儒学
摘要:本文旨在探讨为什么文化与宗教之间存在一种经常被忽视的差异。它把韩国的儒家思想(和儒家价值观)视为一个例子。该书对迪尔凯姆社会科学引发的争论进行了批判性的重新解读,分析了我所谓的“文化-宗教”关系。在这样做的过程中,本文试图提出,先前用于解决这一关系的概念——即“大众宗教”和“公民宗教”——可能需要重新思考,以考虑媒体的重要性,以及它在个性化道德意义系统或规范的制作中促进的象征结构。因此,我认为宗教和文化都是在这样的条件下运作的,即个人不是被动地接受教义,而是解释和构建“生活方式”。我通过对最近韩国电视节目中的“虔诚旅行”趋势及其对儒家价值观的“媒介化”的媒体分析来证明这是如何起作用的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊最新文献
Talismans ( pujŏk 符籍) for Rebirth in Chosŏn Buddhist Rituals and their Earlier Traces in China Talismans ( pujŏk 符籍) for Rebirth in Chosŏn Buddhist Rituals and their Earlier Traces in China Religion and the Cold War: A View from Korea Buddhist Rituals of Ch'ilsŏng, the Seven Stars of the Great Dipper, in Chosŏn Korea Practicing Motherhood and Forming Matrilineal Solidarity: A Counter-cultural Response to the Patrilineal Confucian Family in the Works of Park Wansuh (1931–2011)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1