Testimony about Food Taste and Health: The Impact of Testimony on Children’s Choices about Visually Unfamiliar Foods

IF 1.6 2区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL Journal of Cognition and Development Pub Date : 2021-12-13 DOI:10.1080/15248372.2021.2013226
Naoko Nakamichi
{"title":"Testimony about Food Taste and Health: The Impact of Testimony on Children’s Choices about Visually Unfamiliar Foods","authors":"Naoko Nakamichi","doi":"10.1080/15248372.2021.2013226","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT A food’s visual features and testimony from others are important clues for children when making food choices. Children must integrate these two forms of information to make choices about food. The present study investigated children’s food choices when these two clues are presented together. After confirming that children between the ages of 4–6 years (N= 32) did not prefer visually unfamiliar foods (Experiment 1), Experiment 2 investigated whether positive testimony about the taste or healthiness would influence children’s choices about visually unfamiliar foods. More specifically, children heard testimony from adults and peers that visually unfamiliar foods were either tasty (taste testimony condition, n= 24) or good for you (health testimony condition, n= 24). Then, they were asked whether they would choose to eat the visually unfamiliar foods which were recommended by an adult or a peer. In the no testimony condition, children (n= 24) were asked to choose the foods without hearing testimony about visually unfamiliar foods. Testimony about a food’s taste encouraged children to choose visually unfamiliar foods; peers’ testimony regarding a food’s taste had a stronger influence on children’s selection of visually unfamiliar foods than testimony from adults. However, health testimony did not facilitate choosing visually unfamiliar foods, regardless of whether from an adult or a peer. Why different types and sources of testimony had various degrees of influence on children’s selection of visually unfamiliar foods was discussed.","PeriodicalId":47680,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cognition and Development","volume":"23 1","pages":"305 - 322"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cognition and Development","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15248372.2021.2013226","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT A food’s visual features and testimony from others are important clues for children when making food choices. Children must integrate these two forms of information to make choices about food. The present study investigated children’s food choices when these two clues are presented together. After confirming that children between the ages of 4–6 years (N= 32) did not prefer visually unfamiliar foods (Experiment 1), Experiment 2 investigated whether positive testimony about the taste or healthiness would influence children’s choices about visually unfamiliar foods. More specifically, children heard testimony from adults and peers that visually unfamiliar foods were either tasty (taste testimony condition, n= 24) or good for you (health testimony condition, n= 24). Then, they were asked whether they would choose to eat the visually unfamiliar foods which were recommended by an adult or a peer. In the no testimony condition, children (n= 24) were asked to choose the foods without hearing testimony about visually unfamiliar foods. Testimony about a food’s taste encouraged children to choose visually unfamiliar foods; peers’ testimony regarding a food’s taste had a stronger influence on children’s selection of visually unfamiliar foods than testimony from adults. However, health testimony did not facilitate choosing visually unfamiliar foods, regardless of whether from an adult or a peer. Why different types and sources of testimony had various degrees of influence on children’s selection of visually unfamiliar foods was discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关于食物味道和健康的证词:证词对儿童选择视觉陌生食物的影响
摘要食物的视觉特征和他人的见证是儿童选择食物的重要线索。孩子们必须综合这两种形式的信息来选择食物。当这两条线索同时出现时,本研究调查了儿童的食物选择。在确认4-6岁(N=32)的儿童不喜欢视觉上不熟悉的食物(实验1)后,实验2调查了关于味道或健康的积极证据是否会影响儿童对视觉上不陌生的食物的选择。更具体地说,儿童从成年人和同龄人那里听到的证词表明,视觉上不熟悉的食物要么美味(味觉证词条件,n=24),要么对你有益(健康证词条件,n=24)。然后,他们被问及是否会选择吃成年人或同龄人推荐的视觉上不熟悉的食物。在没有证据的情况下,儿童(n=24)被要求在没有听到视觉上不熟悉的食物的证词的情况下选择食物。关于食物味道的证词鼓励孩子们选择视觉上不熟悉的食物;与成年人的证词相比,同龄人关于食物味道的证词对儿童选择视觉上不熟悉的食物的影响更大。然而,无论是来自成年人还是同龄人,健康证明都不利于选择视觉上不熟悉的食物。讨论了为什么不同类型和来源的证词对儿童选择视觉上不熟悉的食物有不同程度的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cognition and Development is the official journal of the Cognitive Development Society (CDS). Some CDS members are concerned with basic research or theory; others focus on policy issues and practical applications. The range of interests includes cognitive development during all stages of life, and we seek to understand ontogenetic processes in both humans and nonhumans. Finally, their interests encompass typical as well as atypical development, and we attempt to characterize both biological and cultural influences on cognitive change and continuity.
期刊最新文献
Information Sources for Word Meaning in Children’s Picture Books: A Human Simulation Paradigm Study Numeracy Engagement Patterns of U.S. Latine Families Reminiscing Goals and Behavior as Predictors of Child Psychological Functioning Interrelations Between Acuity of the Approximate Number System and Symbolic Skills in Preschool Children Bayesian Tools of the Trade for Developmental Psychologists: A Quick-Start Guide Using JASP
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1