George Gascoigne’s “Patched Cote”: Writing Pedagogy and Poetic Style in the Literature Classroom

IF 0.6 2区 文学 0 LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES ENGLISH LITERARY RENAISSANCE Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1086/717198
Adhaar Noor Desai
{"title":"George Gascoigne’s “Patched Cote”: Writing Pedagogy and Poetic Style in the Literature Classroom","authors":"Adhaar Noor Desai","doi":"10.1086/717198","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay situates George Gascoigne’s literary career against humanist commentary on a stylistic error, “patchwork writing,” that emblematizes broader concerns about imitation, originality, transgression, and novelty. It argues that Gascoigne advocated a composition pedagogy rooted in choice, lenience, and attentiveness—and that studying his work can productively revitalize the writing pedagogy of the modern literature classroom. At the turbulent start to Gascoigne’s career, he was forced to patch over his poetry in response to charges of indecorousness. Despite his performative repentance, he would also betray resentment about how such discipline would stifle his creativity. He depicts this stifling in The Glasse of Governement (1575), a closet drama depicting a pair of prodigal sons failing to do their “tedious” homework and ultimately being executed by the state. Reading this tragic outcome against Gascoigne’s poetic principles, as articulated in his verses and in his guidebook, “Certayne Notes of Instruction,” reveals the text critiquing how rigid forms of composition pedagogy reflect political moribundity. The essay concludes by taking up Rebecca Moore Howard’s defense of students’ “patchwriting” as a first step toward reconsidering how a pedagogy rooted in choice might more centrally inform the role of writing in the early modern literature classroom. [A.N.D.]","PeriodicalId":44199,"journal":{"name":"ENGLISH LITERARY RENAISSANCE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ENGLISH LITERARY RENAISSANCE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/717198","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This essay situates George Gascoigne’s literary career against humanist commentary on a stylistic error, “patchwork writing,” that emblematizes broader concerns about imitation, originality, transgression, and novelty. It argues that Gascoigne advocated a composition pedagogy rooted in choice, lenience, and attentiveness—and that studying his work can productively revitalize the writing pedagogy of the modern literature classroom. At the turbulent start to Gascoigne’s career, he was forced to patch over his poetry in response to charges of indecorousness. Despite his performative repentance, he would also betray resentment about how such discipline would stifle his creativity. He depicts this stifling in The Glasse of Governement (1575), a closet drama depicting a pair of prodigal sons failing to do their “tedious” homework and ultimately being executed by the state. Reading this tragic outcome against Gascoigne’s poetic principles, as articulated in his verses and in his guidebook, “Certayne Notes of Instruction,” reveals the text critiquing how rigid forms of composition pedagogy reflect political moribundity. The essay concludes by taking up Rebecca Moore Howard’s defense of students’ “patchwriting” as a first step toward reconsidering how a pedagogy rooted in choice might more centrally inform the role of writing in the early modern literature classroom. [A.N.D.]
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
乔治·加斯科因的“补丁科特”:文学课堂上的写作教育学与诗歌风格
这篇文章将乔治·加斯科因的文学生涯与人文主义评论置于一个风格错误“拼凑写作”的对比之下,该错误象征着对模仿、独创性、越轨和新颖性的更广泛关注。它认为,加斯科因提倡一种植根于选择、宽容和专注的写作教学法,研究他的作品可以有效地振兴现代文学课堂的写作教学。在加斯科因职业生涯动荡的开始,他被迫修改自己的诗歌,以回应对他的猥亵指控。尽管他表现出了忏悔,但他也会流露出对这种纪律会扼杀他的创造力的怨恨。他在《政府的玻璃》(1575)中描述了这种令人窒息的情况,这是一部隐秘的戏剧,描绘了一对浪子未能完成“乏味”的家庭作业,最终被国家处决。正如加斯科因的诗歌和指南《Certayne教学笔记》中所阐述的那样,阅读这一违背加斯科因诗歌原则的悲剧结果,揭示了文本对僵化的作文教学形式如何反映政治腐朽的批评。最后,这篇文章引用了丽贝卡·摩尔-霍华德对学生“拼凑”的辩护,作为重新思考植根于选择的教育法如何更集中地影响写作在早期现代文学课堂中的作用的第一步。【A.N.D.】
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: English Literary Renaissance is a journal devoted to current criticism and scholarship of Tudor and early Stuart English literature, 1485-1665, including Shakespeare, Spenser, Donne, and Milton. It is unique in featuring the publication of rare texts and newly discovered manuscripts of the period and current annotated bibliographies of work in the field. It is illustrated with contemporary woodcuts and engravings of Renaissance England and Europe.
期刊最新文献
Sidney’s Penetrations: Metaphors and Ideas Margaret Russell, Countess of Cumberland’s Letter to John Layfield: Composing Grief through Consolation and Lamentation A Proof of Pleasure: Renaissance in Rancière, Auerbach, Marlowe Lucy Hutchinson’s Everyday War: The 1640s Manuscript and her Restoration ‘Elegies’ “Noe dish whose tast, or dressing, is unknown / Unto oʳ natives”: Local and Global Material Cultures in the Food Rituals of Thomas Salusbury’s 1634 “Chirk Castle Entertainment”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1