Does dockless bike-share influence transit use? Evidence from the Sacramento region

IF 3.1 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES International Journal of Sustainable Transportation Pub Date : 2024-02-01 DOI:10.1080/15568318.2023.2252757
Hossain Mohiuddin , Tatsuya Fukushige , Dillon T. Fitch-Polse , Susan L. Handy
{"title":"Does dockless bike-share influence transit use? Evidence from the Sacramento region","authors":"Hossain Mohiuddin ,&nbsp;Tatsuya Fukushige ,&nbsp;Dillon T. Fitch-Polse ,&nbsp;Susan L. Handy","doi":"10.1080/15568318.2023.2252757","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Whether micromobility is hurting or boosting transit ridership remains a matter of debate. Previous studies on this topic mainly use either individual level data or system level data. This paper provides insights into this debate through analyses of the connection between bike-share use and transit use at both the individual-level and the system-level. The analysis uses data from an intercept survey of bike-share users and system-level data on bike-share trips from the Sacramento region’s dockless electric bike-share system prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. Our individual-level analysis results suggest that people in the Sacramento region are more likely to replace their transit use with bike-share than to use bike-share as a first- or last-mile transit connector. Certain socio-demographic groups, however, are more likely to use bike share to connect to transit compared to others. Analysis of the system-level data shows that the number of bike-share trips that begin or end near transit stops is positively associated with transit boarding or alightings at those stops conditional on variables known to directly influence transit ridership. In this study, individual- and system-level analyses lead to different conclusions about the relationship between bike-share and transit, suggesting that reliance on system-level data alone may not provide an accurate assessment of the relationship between bike-share and transit use. A detailed understanding of the relationship using both sources of data can assist in better policy formulation that benefits both modes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47824,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Sustainable Transportation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Sustainable Transportation","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/org/science/article/pii/S1556831823001594","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Whether micromobility is hurting or boosting transit ridership remains a matter of debate. Previous studies on this topic mainly use either individual level data or system level data. This paper provides insights into this debate through analyses of the connection between bike-share use and transit use at both the individual-level and the system-level. The analysis uses data from an intercept survey of bike-share users and system-level data on bike-share trips from the Sacramento region’s dockless electric bike-share system prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. Our individual-level analysis results suggest that people in the Sacramento region are more likely to replace their transit use with bike-share than to use bike-share as a first- or last-mile transit connector. Certain socio-demographic groups, however, are more likely to use bike share to connect to transit compared to others. Analysis of the system-level data shows that the number of bike-share trips that begin or end near transit stops is positively associated with transit boarding or alightings at those stops conditional on variables known to directly influence transit ridership. In this study, individual- and system-level analyses lead to different conclusions about the relationship between bike-share and transit, suggesting that reliance on system-level data alone may not provide an accurate assessment of the relationship between bike-share and transit use. A detailed understanding of the relationship using both sources of data can assist in better policy formulation that benefits both modes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
无码头共享单车会影响公交使用吗?萨克拉门托地区的证据
微移动到底是损害了还是提高了公交乘客的数量,这仍然是一个争论不休的问题。以往有关这一主题的研究主要使用个人层面的数据或系统层面的数据。本文通过从个人层面和系统层面分析共享单车使用与公交使用之间的联系,为这一争论提供了深入的见解。分析使用了对共享单车用户的拦截调查数据,以及萨克拉门托地区无桩电动共享单车系统在 COVID-19 大流行之前的系统级共享单车出行数据。我们的个人层面分析结果表明,萨克拉门托地区的人们更倾向于用共享单车取代公交,而不是将共享单车作为第一公里或最后一公里的公交连接。然而,与其他群体相比,某些社会人口群体更倾向于使用共享单车连接公交。对系统级数据的分析表明,以公交站点为起点或终点的共享单车出行次数与公交站点的上下车人次呈正相关,而这取决于已知的直接影响公交乘客的变量。在这项研究中,个人层面和系统层面的分析对共享单车与公交之间的关系得出了不同的结论,这表明仅依靠系统层面的数据可能无法准确评估共享单车与公交使用之间的关系。利用两种数据来源详细了解两者之间的关系,有助于更好地制定政策,使两种交通方式都能受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
2.60%
发文量
56
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Sustainable Transportation provides a discussion forum for the exchange of new and innovative ideas on sustainable transportation research in the context of environmental, economical, social, and engineering aspects, as well as current and future interactions of transportation systems and other urban subsystems. The scope includes the examination of overall sustainability of any transportation system, including its infrastructure, vehicle, operation, and maintenance; the integration of social science disciplines, engineering, and information technology with transportation; the understanding of the comparative aspects of different transportation systems from a global perspective; qualitative and quantitative transportation studies; and case studies, surveys, and expository papers in an international or local context. Equal emphasis is placed on the problems of sustainable transportation that are associated with passenger and freight transportation modes in both industrialized and non-industrialized areas. All submitted manuscripts are subject to initial evaluation by the Editors and, if found suitable for further consideration, to peer review by independent, anonymous expert reviewers. All peer review is single-blind. Submissions are made online via ScholarOne Manuscripts.
期刊最新文献
Driving the future: How value retention rate shapes electric vehicle adoption Last mile delivery with drones: A carbon emissions comparison Perceived seriousness of environmental issues and the influence of willingness to pay for hybrid vehicles: An anthropological extension of the theory of planned behavior Cargo bikes for personal transport: A user segmentation based on motivations for use Am I really willing to use my electric vehicle sustainably? A study on the charging preferences of electric vehicle users
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1