G. Pascariu, Andreea IACOBUȚĂ-MIHĂIȚĂ, Carmen Pintilescu, Ramona Ţigănaşu
{"title":"Institutional Dynamics and Economic Resilience in Central and Eastern EU Countries. Relevance for Policies","authors":"G. Pascariu, Andreea IACOBUȚĂ-MIHĂIȚĂ, Carmen Pintilescu, Ramona Ţigănaşu","doi":"10.24193/tras.si2021.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the global context generated by the 2008-2009 economic crisis and by the current COVID-19 pandemic, the analysis of the way in which territories can resist, return and adapt to shocks has become a priority for resilience-based policies. The paper aims to investigate the role of institutions in economic resilience, in the particular case of Central and Eastern European countries since, despite the ongoing convergence process, the institutional gaps and weaknesses of these states challenge their possibilities to recover after this health crisis, as well as to improve their resilience capacity. The methodological approach involves, firstly, a cross-country time-series panel regression, using the annual data from 1996 until 2019. Secondly, we applied the principal component regression, in order to capture the country specificities. The research focuses on the linkages between institutional dynamics and economic resilience, an issue less reflected in literature. Our results confirm the influence of institutional factors on economic resilience and, more importantly, it is highlighted that the ‘one size fits all’ principle does not apply in the case of recovery and resilience programs, which is due to the fact that institutions act differently, depending on various socio-economic and political contexts.","PeriodicalId":45832,"journal":{"name":"Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24193/tras.si2021.5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Abstract
In the global context generated by the 2008-2009 economic crisis and by the current COVID-19 pandemic, the analysis of the way in which territories can resist, return and adapt to shocks has become a priority for resilience-based policies. The paper aims to investigate the role of institutions in economic resilience, in the particular case of Central and Eastern European countries since, despite the ongoing convergence process, the institutional gaps and weaknesses of these states challenge their possibilities to recover after this health crisis, as well as to improve their resilience capacity. The methodological approach involves, firstly, a cross-country time-series panel regression, using the annual data from 1996 until 2019. Secondly, we applied the principal component regression, in order to capture the country specificities. The research focuses on the linkages between institutional dynamics and economic resilience, an issue less reflected in literature. Our results confirm the influence of institutional factors on economic resilience and, more importantly, it is highlighted that the ‘one size fits all’ principle does not apply in the case of recovery and resilience programs, which is due to the fact that institutions act differently, depending on various socio-economic and political contexts.
期刊介绍：
TRAS represents a collective effort initiated by an international group aimed at boosting the research in the field of public administration in a country where during the communist regime there was no tradition in this sense. TRAS represents a unique source of specialized analysis of the ex-communist space, of the transition processes to democracy, of the reform of public administration, and of comparative analysis of administrative systems. The general topic covered by the articles in the Review is administrative sciences. As a result of an interdisciplinary, modern approach, the articles cover the following specific themes: Public management, public policy, administrative law, public policy analysis, regional development, community development, public finances, urban planning, program evaluation in public administration, ethics, comparative administrative systems, etc. TRAS encourages the authors to submit articles that are based on empirical research. From the standpoint of the topic covered, TRAS is lined up with the trends followed by other international journals in the field of public administration. All articles submitted to the Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences have to present a clear connection to the field of administrative sciences and the research (both theoretical and empirical) should be conducted from this perspective. Interdisciplinary topics related to organizational theory, sustainable development and CSR, international relations, etc. can be considered for publication, however the research needs to address relevant issues from the perspective of the public sector. Articles which use highly specialized econometrics models as well as studies addressing macro-economic topics will not be considered for evaluation. The decision on whether a certain topic falls within the interest of TRAS belongs to the editors and it is not connected with the overall quality of the work submitted.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
