Ethnozoological uses and local people’s perceptions of a competitor Primate in the Fringe of the Kundelungu National Park, D.R. Congo

IF 1.6 Q3 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Ethnobiology and Conservation Pub Date : 2020-08-20 DOI:10.15451/ec2020-08-9.33-1-9
Paul Kaseya Kazaba, Gordon Mandomombe Tinaye, Didier Kambol Tshikung, Akindayo Abiodun Sowunmi, Albert Orodena Aweto
{"title":"Ethnozoological uses and local people’s perceptions of a competitor Primate in the Fringe of the Kundelungu National Park, D.R. Congo","authors":"Paul Kaseya Kazaba, Gordon Mandomombe Tinaye, Didier Kambol Tshikung, Akindayo Abiodun Sowunmi, Albert Orodena Aweto","doi":"10.15451/ec2020-08-9.33-1-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Several studies investigate the human dimension of human-wildlife conflicts, but human attitudes towards forest-dependent animals such as primates in the context of competition for forest resources are still under-researched. We used a semi-structured questionnaire and conducted ethnozoological surveys in order to identify the uses of Kinda baboons (Papio kindae Lönnberg) and the main factors associated with local people’s attitudes towards this frugivorous primate, at the periphery of the Kundelungu National Park, Democratic Republic of Congo. This study indicates that Kinda baboons are important to community members, essentially for consumptive uses, namely as bushmeat and medicinal animals. The association between local peoples’ anti-conservation attitudes towards these baboons and observation of the depletion of co-used indigenous trees has been confirmed statistically, suggesting the perception of baboons as competitors. Also, even though the majority of respondents recognized the vulnerability of baboons to the depletion of co-used indigenous trees, against our hypothesis, most of them were not inclined to use these resources sustainably. However, an association between the frequency of encounters with Kinda baboons and park-adjacent dwellers’ willingness to conserve baboon-edible trees has been established. We therefore support the view that improving the availability of co-used trees through reforestation or agroforestry is likely to alleviate the prevalence of negative attitudes towards tree-dependent animals. Also, in order to gain community support to protected areas and wildlife, pro-conservation campaigns in similar settings should not merely highlight the vulnerability of animals to the depletion of their resources, but also promote the responsible access of local people to protected","PeriodicalId":44826,"journal":{"name":"Ethnobiology and Conservation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethnobiology and Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15451/ec2020-08-9.33-1-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Several studies investigate the human dimension of human-wildlife conflicts, but human attitudes towards forest-dependent animals such as primates in the context of competition for forest resources are still under-researched. We used a semi-structured questionnaire and conducted ethnozoological surveys in order to identify the uses of Kinda baboons (Papio kindae Lönnberg) and the main factors associated with local people’s attitudes towards this frugivorous primate, at the periphery of the Kundelungu National Park, Democratic Republic of Congo. This study indicates that Kinda baboons are important to community members, essentially for consumptive uses, namely as bushmeat and medicinal animals. The association between local peoples’ anti-conservation attitudes towards these baboons and observation of the depletion of co-used indigenous trees has been confirmed statistically, suggesting the perception of baboons as competitors. Also, even though the majority of respondents recognized the vulnerability of baboons to the depletion of co-used indigenous trees, against our hypothesis, most of them were not inclined to use these resources sustainably. However, an association between the frequency of encounters with Kinda baboons and park-adjacent dwellers’ willingness to conserve baboon-edible trees has been established. We therefore support the view that improving the availability of co-used trees through reforestation or agroforestry is likely to alleviate the prevalence of negative attitudes towards tree-dependent animals. Also, in order to gain community support to protected areas and wildlife, pro-conservation campaigns in similar settings should not merely highlight the vulnerability of animals to the depletion of their resources, but also promote the responsible access of local people to protected
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
刚果民主共和国昆德隆古国家公园边缘的民族动物学用途和当地人对竞争对手灵长类动物的看法
一些研究调查了人类与野生动物冲突的人类层面,但在森林资源竞争的背景下,人类对灵长类等依赖森林的动物的态度仍在研究中。我们使用了半结构化问卷,并进行了民族动物学调查,以确定金达狒狒(Papio kindae Lönnberg)的用途,以及与刚果民主共和国昆德伦古国家公园周边的当地人对这种食草灵长类动物态度相关的主要因素。这项研究表明,金达狒狒对社区成员很重要,主要用于消费用途,即作为丛林肉和药用动物。从统计数据来看,当地人对这些狒狒的反保护态度与对共同使用的本土树木枯竭的观察之间的联系已经得到证实,这表明人们认为狒狒是竞争对手。此外,尽管大多数受访者认识到狒狒容易受到共同使用的本土树木枯竭的影响,但与我们的假设相反,他们中的大多数人并不倾向于可持续地使用这些资源。然而,与金达狒狒相遇的频率与公园附近居民保护狒狒可食用树木的意愿之间存在联系。因此,我们支持这样一种观点,即通过重新造林或农林业提高共同使用树木的可用性,可能会缓解对依赖树木的动物普遍存在的负面态度。此外,为了获得社区对保护区和野生动物的支持,在类似环境中开展的支持保护运动不仅应强调动物易受资源枯竭的影响,还应促进当地人负责任地获得保护
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ethnobiology and Conservation
Ethnobiology and Conservation BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
21.40%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: Ethnobiology and Conservation (EC) is an open access and peer-reviewed online journal that publishes original contributions in all fields of ethnobiology and conservation of nature. The scope of EC includes traditional ecological knowledge, human ecology, ethnoecology, ethnopharmacology, ecological anthropology, and history and philosophy of science. Contributions in the area of conservation of nature can involve studies that are normally in the field of traditional ecological studies, as well as in animal and plant biology, ethology, biogeography, management of fauna and flora, and ethical and legal aspects about the conservation of biodiversity. However, all papers should focus explicitly on their contribution to the conservation of nature. Merely descriptive papers without a theoretical discussion contextualized from the findings, although possibly being accepted, will not be given priority for publication.
期刊最新文献
Understanding the drivers of the live bird trade in Brazil Traditional ecological knowledge of mangrove wood use on the Brazilian Amazon coast Politics of Knowledge in Conservation: (De)valued Traditional Ecological Knowledge of Bote in Chitwan National Park, Nepal A Bibliometric Analysis Concerning Local Ecological Knowledge on Elasmobranchs and Chimaeras Comparison of local ecological knowledge versus camera trapping to establish terrestrial wildlife baselines in community hunting territories within the Yangambi landscape in the Democratic Republic of Congo
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1