The Impact of Color of the Instructions and Questions on the Respondents’ ‘Survey Recognition, Response Time, and Response Accuracy’ in Designing a Survey

Q1 Arts and Humanities Archives of Design Research Pub Date : 2023-08-31 DOI:10.15187/adr.2023.08.36.3.273
JeongHyun Kim, Eunryung Hyun
{"title":"The Impact of Color of the Instructions and Questions on the Respondents’ ‘Survey Recognition, Response Time, and Response Accuracy’ in Designing a Survey","authors":"JeongHyun Kim, Eunryung Hyun","doi":"10.15187/adr.2023.08.36.3.273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background In recent times, there have been frequent cases of insincere respondents as the survey environment changed from the previous printing basis. Insincere responses, which create errors and missing values, tarnish the meaning of the survey as a data collection tool. This study aims to discover the cause of such insincere responses through a pilot research. In order to solve the problem, the study applied color, — a cognitive information design element —, in designing the survey and analyzed its effectiveness in terms of survey recognition, response time, and response accuracy. Methods A pilot study was conducted through structural in-depth interviews in respect to qualitative research to discover the cause of insincere responses. A new survey tool was designed with cognitive information design elements based on the earlier theories. Lastly, 90 men and women over the age of 19 who were divided into control and experimental groups between October and December 2022. The survey was composed of 13 questions. Afterwards, We used SPSS 21.0 to compare the groups’ answers to verify the effectiveness of applying color in designing the survey. Results According to the results of difference checks and crossover analysis, the experimental group’s t value at –2.180** was higher in the cognitive section’s question ① (definition of data visualization). Also, in the response time section’s question ⑤ (length of time spent on checking the question), the experimental group’s value of 1.950 was shorter than that of the control group. For the response accuracy section’s question ⑦ (confirming the visual checklist required by the questionnaire), the experimental group showed 20 percent higher accuracy than the control group. In the case of question ⑧ (checking how to properly write down one’s answer in accordance with the questionnaire), the experimental group demonstrated 15.5 percent higher answer rate than the control group.","PeriodicalId":52137,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Design Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Design Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15187/adr.2023.08.36.3.273","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background In recent times, there have been frequent cases of insincere respondents as the survey environment changed from the previous printing basis. Insincere responses, which create errors and missing values, tarnish the meaning of the survey as a data collection tool. This study aims to discover the cause of such insincere responses through a pilot research. In order to solve the problem, the study applied color, — a cognitive information design element —, in designing the survey and analyzed its effectiveness in terms of survey recognition, response time, and response accuracy. Methods A pilot study was conducted through structural in-depth interviews in respect to qualitative research to discover the cause of insincere responses. A new survey tool was designed with cognitive information design elements based on the earlier theories. Lastly, 90 men and women over the age of 19 who were divided into control and experimental groups between October and December 2022. The survey was composed of 13 questions. Afterwards, We used SPSS 21.0 to compare the groups’ answers to verify the effectiveness of applying color in designing the survey. Results According to the results of difference checks and crossover analysis, the experimental group’s t value at –2.180** was higher in the cognitive section’s question ① (definition of data visualization). Also, in the response time section’s question ⑤ (length of time spent on checking the question), the experimental group’s value of 1.950 was shorter than that of the control group. For the response accuracy section’s question ⑦ (confirming the visual checklist required by the questionnaire), the experimental group showed 20 percent higher accuracy than the control group. In the case of question ⑧ (checking how to properly write down one’s answer in accordance with the questionnaire), the experimental group demonstrated 15.5 percent higher answer rate than the control group.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
问卷设计中,指示和问题的颜色对被调查者的“调查认知度、反应时间和反应准确性”的影响
近年来,由于调查环境与以往的印刷基础不同,调查对象不诚实的情况时有发生。不真诚的回答会造成错误和价值缺失,损害调查作为数据收集工具的意义。本研究旨在通过一项试点研究来发现这种不真诚反应的原因。为了解决这一问题,本研究将认知信息设计元素——颜色运用到问卷设计中,并从问卷识别度、响应时间和响应准确性三个方面分析了其有效性。方法在定性研究的基础上,采用结构性深度访谈的方法进行初步研究,探讨不真诚反应的成因。在前人理论的基础上,运用认知信息设计元素设计了一种新的调查工具。最后,在2022年10月至12月期间,90名19岁以上的男性和女性被分为对照组和实验组。该调查由13个问题组成。之后,我们使用SPSS 21.0来比较各组的答案,以验证在设计调查时应用颜色的有效性。结果经差异检验和交叉分析,实验组在认知部分①题(数据可视化定义)的t值在-2.180 **处较高。同样,在回答时间部分的问题⑤(检查问题所花费的时间长度)中,实验组的值为1.950小于对照组。对于回答准确度部分的问题⑦(确认问卷要求的视觉检查表),实验组的准确度比对照组高20%。在题目⑧(检查如何根据问卷正确写下自己的答案)的情况下,实验组的答题率比对照组高15.5%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Archives of Design Research
Archives of Design Research Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: Archives of Design Research (ADR) is an international journal publishing original research in the field of design, including industrial design, visual communication design, interaction design, space design, and service design. It also invites research outcomes from design-related interdisciplinary fields such as the humanities, arts, technology, society and business. It is an open-access journal, publishing four issues per year. Currently papers are published in both English and Korean with an English abstract. ADR aims to build a strong foundation of knowledge in design through the introduction of basic, applied and clinical research. ADR serves as a venue and platform to archive and transfer fundamental design theories, methods, tools and cases. Research areas covered in the journal include: -Design Theory and its Methodology -Design Philosophy, Ethics, Values, and Issues -Design Education -Design Management and Strategy -Sustainability, Culture, History, and Societal Design -Human Behaviors, Perception, and Emotion -Semantics, Aesthetics and Experience in Design -Interaction and Interface Design -Design Tools and New Media -Universal Design/Inclusive Design -Design Creativity -Design Projects and Case Studies
期刊最新文献
Analysis of Design Friction for Mobile Service UI based on the Sensitivity of Personal Information Types Elements and Systematization of ‘Reading Picture’ in Textless Picture Books through Semiotics The Effect of Advertising Types in Mobile Marketing Design on Consumer Advertisement Acceptability and Purchase Intention The Design of an AI Care Robot Based on Intimacy for the Emotional Stability of the Elderly Reconstructing the Content and Context of the KBS Special Feature “The World Is in an Era of Design Revolution”(1983)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1