Effective Practices in Community Supervision model: Staff perceptions of the model and implementation

IF 0.8 Q4 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY European Journal of Probation Pub Date : 2020-12-01 DOI:10.1177/2066220320981175
Lily Gleicher
{"title":"Effective Practices in Community Supervision model: Staff perceptions of the model and implementation","authors":"Lily Gleicher","doi":"10.1177/2066220320981175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Staff who provide service to individuals under correctional supervision are critical to organizational change, implementation, and sustainability of policies and practices. The training on evidence-based practices demonstrates a movement toward effective interactions with community supervision officers and their clients, specifically to the Risk–Need–Responsivity model and core correctional practices. Research over the past several decades provides that fidelity to Risk–Need–Responsivity and core correctional practice can reduce recidivism among the community correctional population. However, the correctional field has a history of training staff, but limited success in implementing and sustaining these practices. The current qualitative study analyzes the feedback from 307 community supervision officers who responded to open-ended questions regarding the implementation of Effective Practices in Community Supervision model, a curriculum that incorporates the Risk–Need–Responsivity model and core correctional practices. Qualitative responses indicate key themes that help and hinder the implementation of evidence-based practices: individual attitudes and beliefs, organizational elements, and leadership.","PeriodicalId":44523,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Probation","volume":"12 1","pages":"157 - 181"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/2066220320981175","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Probation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2066220320981175","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Staff who provide service to individuals under correctional supervision are critical to organizational change, implementation, and sustainability of policies and practices. The training on evidence-based practices demonstrates a movement toward effective interactions with community supervision officers and their clients, specifically to the Risk–Need–Responsivity model and core correctional practices. Research over the past several decades provides that fidelity to Risk–Need–Responsivity and core correctional practice can reduce recidivism among the community correctional population. However, the correctional field has a history of training staff, but limited success in implementing and sustaining these practices. The current qualitative study analyzes the feedback from 307 community supervision officers who responded to open-ended questions regarding the implementation of Effective Practices in Community Supervision model, a curriculum that incorporates the Risk–Need–Responsivity model and core correctional practices. Qualitative responses indicate key themes that help and hinder the implementation of evidence-based practices: individual attitudes and beliefs, organizational elements, and leadership.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社区监督模式的有效做法:工作人员对该模式的看法和实施
为受管教的个人提供服务的工作人员对组织变革、政策和做法的实施以及可持续性至关重要。循证实践培训表明了与社区监督官员及其客户进行有效互动的趋势,特别是风险-需求-响应模式和核心矫正实践。过去几十年的研究表明,忠于风险-需求-反应能力和核心惩教实践可以减少社区惩教人群的累犯。然而,惩教领域有培训工作人员的历史,但在实施和维持这些做法方面取得的成功有限。目前的定性研究分析了307名社区监督官员的反馈,他们回答了关于社区监督有效实践模式实施的开放式问题,该课程包含风险-需求-响应模式和核心惩教实践。定性回应指出了有助于和阻碍循证实践实施的关键主题:个人态度和信念、组织要素和领导力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Probation
European Journal of Probation CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊最新文献
Social reintegration of individuals convicted of terrorism in France: From paradox to blind spot? ‘You take me for a moron or what’? Analysing French felony courts through legitimacy of justice and therapeutic jurisprudence lenses Profile of men and women sentenced to community services: Risk factors and social vulnerability Enforcement of alternative measures to detention in EU countries: The Italian situation Preface to the special edition on the application of the principle of mutual trust in matters of prison and probation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1