Recognition of prior learning in professional education from an organisational perspective

IF 1.9 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH International Journal of Lifelong Education Pub Date : 2023-02-19 DOI:10.1080/02601370.2023.2177759
Carmen Baumeler, Sonja Engelage, Christine Hämmerli, Patrizia Salzmann
{"title":"Recognition of prior learning in professional education from an organisational perspective","authors":"Carmen Baumeler, Sonja Engelage, Christine Hämmerli, Patrizia Salzmann","doi":"10.1080/02601370.2023.2177759","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Recognition of prior learning (RPL) is often said to facilitate lifelong learning and occurs when already-acquired learning outcomes are officially valued. The education system is a central arena of RPL, allowing facilitated access to or shortening of study programmes. This study explores RPL practices in Switzerland. We ask the following research question: How do professional education institutions regulate, practice, and justify RPL? We start from the premise that RPL practices in higher education institutions are shaped by national RPL policies, professional bodies, and the nature of the respective labour markets. However, within these framework conditions, higher education institutions also create their own organisational policies, thereby promoting or hindering RPL. In addition, the study programme’s knowledge domain and the responsible persons’ pedagogic agency, shaped by their pedagogic concepts and individual attitudes, are also guiding factors. To answer our research question, we conducted qualitative comparative case studies and compared the RPL practices of professional education institutions that offer study programmes for hospitality management and social education. Our results show that organisations offering the same professional study programmes regulate, practice, and justify RPL differently, indicating the importance of organisational gatekeepers’ pedagogic agency.","PeriodicalId":46861,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Lifelong Education","volume":"42 1","pages":"208 - 221"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Lifelong Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02601370.2023.2177759","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT Recognition of prior learning (RPL) is often said to facilitate lifelong learning and occurs when already-acquired learning outcomes are officially valued. The education system is a central arena of RPL, allowing facilitated access to or shortening of study programmes. This study explores RPL practices in Switzerland. We ask the following research question: How do professional education institutions regulate, practice, and justify RPL? We start from the premise that RPL practices in higher education institutions are shaped by national RPL policies, professional bodies, and the nature of the respective labour markets. However, within these framework conditions, higher education institutions also create their own organisational policies, thereby promoting or hindering RPL. In addition, the study programme’s knowledge domain and the responsible persons’ pedagogic agency, shaped by their pedagogic concepts and individual attitudes, are also guiding factors. To answer our research question, we conducted qualitative comparative case studies and compared the RPL practices of professional education institutions that offer study programmes for hospitality management and social education. Our results show that organisations offering the same professional study programmes regulate, practice, and justify RPL differently, indicating the importance of organisational gatekeepers’ pedagogic agency.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从组织的角度对专业教育中先前学习的认可
先验学习认知(RPL)通常被认为有助于终身学习,并且发生在已经获得的学习成果受到官方重视时。教育系统是RPL的中心舞台,可以方便地获得或缩短学习计划。本研究探讨了瑞士的RPL实践。我们提出以下研究问题:专业教育机构如何规范、实践和证明RPL?我们的出发点是,高等教育机构的RPL实践是由国家RPL政策、专业机构和各自劳动力市场的性质决定的。然而,在这些框架条件下,高等教育机构也制定了自己的组织政策,从而促进或阻碍RPL。此外,研究方案的知识领域和负责人的教育机构,由他们的教育观念和个人态度决定,也是指导因素。为了回答我们的研究问题,我们进行了定性比较案例研究,并比较了提供酒店管理和社会教育学习课程的专业教育机构的RPL实践。我们的研究结果表明,提供相同专业学习课程的组织以不同的方式规范、实践和证明RPL,这表明了组织守门人教育代理的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Lifelong Education
International Journal of Lifelong Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
27.80%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Lifelong Education provides a forum for debate on the principles and practice of lifelong, adult, continuing, recurrent and initial education and learning, whether in formal, institutional or informal settings. Common themes include social purpose in lifelong education, and sociological, policy and political studies of lifelong education. The journal recognises that research into lifelong learning needs to focus on the relationships between schooling, later learning, active citizenship and personal fulfilment, as well as the relationship between schooling, employability and economic development.
期刊最新文献
Narrative value theory: an educational biography as an iterative theory-of-self Online courses for adults: do they replace or supplement on-site courses? Ideas on how educators facilitate interprofessional learning through controversies The regulatory effect of self-control in the relationship between life satisfaction and lifelong learning motivation in adults Handbook on digital entrepreneurship in adult education for learners, teachers and teacher trainers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1