Hybrid demand forecasting models: pre-pandemic and pandemic use studies

Equilibrium Pub Date : 2022-09-30 DOI:10.24136/eq.2022.024
A. Kolková, P. Rozehnal
{"title":"Hybrid demand forecasting models: pre-pandemic and pandemic use studies","authors":"A. Kolková, P. Rozehnal","doi":"10.24136/eq.2022.024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research background: In business practice and academic sphere, the question of which of the prognostic models is the most accurate is constantly present. The accuracy of models based on artificial intelligence and statistical models has long been discussed. By combining the advantages of both groups, hybrid models have emerged. These models show high accuracy. Moreover, the question remains whether data in a dynamically changing economy (for example, in a pandemic period) have changed the possibilities of using these models. The changing economy will continue to be an important element in demand forecasting in the years to come. In business, where the concept of just in time already proves to be insufficient, it is necessary to open new research questions in the field of demand forecasting.\nPurpose of the article: The aim of the article is to apply hybrid models to bicycle sales e-shop data with a comparison of accuracy models in the pre-pandemic period and in the pandemic period. The paper examines the hypothesis that the pandemic period has changed the accuracy of hybrid models in comparison with statistical models and models based on artificial neural networks.\nModels: In this study, hybrid models will be used, namely the Theta model and the new forecastHybrid, compared to the statistical models ETS, ARIMA, and models based on artificial neural networks. They will be applied to the data of the e-shop with the cycle assortment in the period from 1.1. 2019 to 5.10 2021. Whereas the period will be divided into two parts, pre-pandemic, i.e. until 1 March 2020 and pandemic after that date. The accuracy evaluation will be based on the RMSE, MAE, and ACF1 indicators.\nFindings & value added: In this study, we have concluded that the prediction of the Hybrid model was the most accurate in both periods. The study can thus provide a scientific basis for any other dynamic changes that may occur in demand forecasting in the future. In other periods when there will be volatile demand, it is essential to choose models in which accuracy will decrease the least. Therefore, this study provides guidance for the use of methods in future periods as well. The stated results are likely to be valid even in an international comparison.","PeriodicalId":84667,"journal":{"name":"Equilibrium","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Equilibrium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.2022.024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Research background: In business practice and academic sphere, the question of which of the prognostic models is the most accurate is constantly present. The accuracy of models based on artificial intelligence and statistical models has long been discussed. By combining the advantages of both groups, hybrid models have emerged. These models show high accuracy. Moreover, the question remains whether data in a dynamically changing economy (for example, in a pandemic period) have changed the possibilities of using these models. The changing economy will continue to be an important element in demand forecasting in the years to come. In business, where the concept of just in time already proves to be insufficient, it is necessary to open new research questions in the field of demand forecasting. Purpose of the article: The aim of the article is to apply hybrid models to bicycle sales e-shop data with a comparison of accuracy models in the pre-pandemic period and in the pandemic period. The paper examines the hypothesis that the pandemic period has changed the accuracy of hybrid models in comparison with statistical models and models based on artificial neural networks. Models: In this study, hybrid models will be used, namely the Theta model and the new forecastHybrid, compared to the statistical models ETS, ARIMA, and models based on artificial neural networks. They will be applied to the data of the e-shop with the cycle assortment in the period from 1.1. 2019 to 5.10 2021. Whereas the period will be divided into two parts, pre-pandemic, i.e. until 1 March 2020 and pandemic after that date. The accuracy evaluation will be based on the RMSE, MAE, and ACF1 indicators. Findings & value added: In this study, we have concluded that the prediction of the Hybrid model was the most accurate in both periods. The study can thus provide a scientific basis for any other dynamic changes that may occur in demand forecasting in the future. In other periods when there will be volatile demand, it is essential to choose models in which accuracy will decrease the least. Therefore, this study provides guidance for the use of methods in future periods as well. The stated results are likely to be valid even in an international comparison.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
混合需求预测模型:疫情前和疫情使用研究
研究背景:在商业实践和学术领域,哪种预测模型最准确的问题一直存在。长期以来,人们一直在讨论基于人工智能和统计模型的模型的准确性。通过结合这两个群体的优势,混合动力车型已经出现。这些模型显示出很高的准确性。此外,问题仍然是,在动态变化的经济中(例如,在疫情期间)的数据是否改变了使用这些模型的可能性。不断变化的经济将继续是未来几年需求预测的一个重要因素。在商业领域,及时的概念已经被证明是不够的,有必要在需求预测领域提出新的研究问题。文章的目的:文章的目的是将混合模型应用于自行车销售电子商店数据,并比较疫情前和疫情期间的准确性模型。与统计模型和基于人工神经网络的模型相比,这篇论文检验了一种假设,即疫情期间改变了混合模型的准确性。模型:在本研究中,将使用混合模型,即Theta模型和新的预测混合模型,与统计模型ETS、ARIMA和基于人工神经网络的模型进行比较。它们将应用于从1.1开始的周期分类中的电子商店的数据。2019年至2021年5月10日。而这一时期将分为两部分,即疫情前,即2020年3月1日之前和疫情之后。准确度评估将基于RMSE、MAE和ACF1指标。研究结果和附加值:在这项研究中,我们得出结论,混合模型的预测在这两个时期都是最准确的。因此,该研究可以为未来需求预测中可能发生的任何其他动态变化提供科学依据。在其他需求不稳定的时期,选择精度下降最小的模型至关重要。因此,本研究也为未来时期的方法使用提供了指导。即使在国际比较中,所述结果也可能是有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The impact of bequest taxation on savings and transfers Barriers to immigrant entrepreneurship: A causal relationship analysis of the Asian immigrant entrepreneurs in Germany employing the DEMATEL approach Google and Apple mobility data as predictors for European tourism during the COVID-19 pandemic: A neural network approach The impact of organizational resilience on the quality of public services: Application of structural equation modeling Relationships between road transport indicators and expenditure of visitors in the context of European countries' tourism competitiveness
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1