Psychometric properties of Kessler's Psychological Distress Scale (K10) in cancer patients

Q4 Psychology Archives of Mental Health Pub Date : 2022-07-01 DOI:10.4103/amh.amh_104_21
Manish N. Thakre, Harshal Sathe, M. Talapalliwar
{"title":"Psychometric properties of Kessler's Psychological Distress Scale (K10) in cancer patients","authors":"Manish N. Thakre, Harshal Sathe, M. Talapalliwar","doi":"10.4103/amh.amh_104_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Context: Kessler's Psychological Distress Scale (K10) is a self-rated, easy-to-apply scale to measure psychological distress. The suitability of its use in treatment-seeking cancer patients in the clinical setup has not been studied. Aims: The aim was to assess the psychometric properties and associations of K10 with sociodemographic and clinical variables and depression levels in the cancer patients visiting the hospital. Settings and Design: The research was a cross-sectional, observational, descriptive study conducted in the oncology outpatient department of a public hospital. Materials and Methods: The data were collected from 155 cancer patients using semi-structured pro forma for sociodemographic and illness-related information. K10 and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 were used to quantify psychological distress and depression. Statistical Analysis Used: The factor structure of Kessler's 10-item scale was assessed by confirmatory factor analysis, and Cronbach's alpha was calculated as a measure of internal consistency. Given the nonnormal distribution of quantitative data, nonparametric tests were used to analyze the association of K10 scores with sociodemographic and clinical variables and depression scores. Results: The K10 showed good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.914) in the cancer patients. In confirmatory factor analysis using structural equation modeling, the single-factor and two-factor models could not adequately fit across goodness-of-fit indices. There was a significant association between the levels of psychological distress and depression in cancer patients. Conclusion: K10, in its current form, is a reliable instrument to measure psychological distress. However, a need-based modification of the existing scale is required in treatment-seeking cancer patients.","PeriodicalId":36181,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Mental Health","volume":"23 1","pages":"101 - 106"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/amh.amh_104_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: Kessler's Psychological Distress Scale (K10) is a self-rated, easy-to-apply scale to measure psychological distress. The suitability of its use in treatment-seeking cancer patients in the clinical setup has not been studied. Aims: The aim was to assess the psychometric properties and associations of K10 with sociodemographic and clinical variables and depression levels in the cancer patients visiting the hospital. Settings and Design: The research was a cross-sectional, observational, descriptive study conducted in the oncology outpatient department of a public hospital. Materials and Methods: The data were collected from 155 cancer patients using semi-structured pro forma for sociodemographic and illness-related information. K10 and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 were used to quantify psychological distress and depression. Statistical Analysis Used: The factor structure of Kessler's 10-item scale was assessed by confirmatory factor analysis, and Cronbach's alpha was calculated as a measure of internal consistency. Given the nonnormal distribution of quantitative data, nonparametric tests were used to analyze the association of K10 scores with sociodemographic and clinical variables and depression scores. Results: The K10 showed good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.914) in the cancer patients. In confirmatory factor analysis using structural equation modeling, the single-factor and two-factor models could not adequately fit across goodness-of-fit indices. There was a significant association between the levels of psychological distress and depression in cancer patients. Conclusion: K10, in its current form, is a reliable instrument to measure psychological distress. However, a need-based modification of the existing scale is required in treatment-seeking cancer patients.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
癌症患者Kessler心理困扰量表(K10)的心理测量特征
背景:Kessler心理困扰量表(K10)是一种自评的、易于应用的心理困扰量表。其在寻求治疗的癌症患者中使用的适用性尚未进行临床研究。目的:目的是评估到医院就诊的癌症患者的心理测量特性以及K10与社会人口学、临床变量和抑郁水平的关系。背景和设计:本研究是一项横断面、观察性、描述性研究,在一家公立医院肿瘤门诊进行。资料与方法:采用半结构化的社会人口学和疾病相关信息表格收集155例癌症患者的数据。使用K10和患者健康问卷-9来量化心理困扰和抑郁。使用统计分析:采用验证性因子分析评估Kessler十项量表的因子结构,并计算Cronbach’s alpha作为内部一致性的度量。鉴于定量数据的非正态分布,采用非参数检验分析K10评分与社会人口学、临床变量和抑郁评分的相关性。结果:K10在肿瘤患者中具有良好的内部一致性(Cronbach’s alpha = 0.914)。在结构方程模型的验证性因子分析中,单因素和双因素模型在拟合优度指标上不能充分拟合。癌症患者的心理困扰程度和抑郁程度之间存在显著关联。结论:目前形式的K10是一种可靠的心理困扰测量工具。然而,在寻求治疗的癌症患者中,需要对现有的量表进行基于需求的修改。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Archives of Mental Health
Archives of Mental Health Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Prevalence of orthorexia nervosa among medical students of South India Orthorexia nervosa among Tunisian medical students: Relationships with self-esteem and stress Effects of adjuvant yoga therapy on craving and perceived stress in alcohol dependence syndrome: A randomized control study Prevalence of test anxiety and their related coping strategies in medical students – A cross-sectional study A study of adverse childhood experiences and psychopathology of imprisoned sexual offenders at a central prison, Hyderabad, Telangana
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1