Validation of the New International League Against Epilepsy 2017 Classification for Determining Seizure Type in Indian Patients

S. Manorenj, Navya Sagari
{"title":"Validation of the New International League Against Epilepsy 2017 Classification for Determining Seizure Type in Indian Patients","authors":"S. Manorenj, Navya Sagari","doi":"10.1055/s-0041-1731934","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Introduction Epilepsy is a common condition in neurology comprising several electroclinical syndromes and seizure disorders of varying known and unknown etiologies that require variable diagnostic workup, treatment, and have obviously different prognoses. Therefore, for appropriate patient management, the best possible classification system for epilepsy is required. The International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) is continuously working on this with the latest classification provided in 2017. There is little knowledge about seizure type based on newer classification systems in Indian patients. Aims and Objective To test the applicability of the newer ILAE 2017 classification of epilepsy in determining seizure type in Indian patients, with respect to right patient management, the best classification system for epilepsy is necessary. Materials and Methods Prospective data of 310 consecutive patients with seizures presenting in neurology department was collected from December 2017 to June 2018 and analyzed according to the newer systems of classification of seizures proposed by ILAE in 2017. Results All 310 patients in age ranging from one year to 72 years with seizures could be classified according to the ILAE 2017 classification system. Focal onset seizure was noted in 66 patients (21.3%), while 244 patients (78.7%) had generalized onset based on clinical onset of seizure. Awareness was impaired in 262 (84.5%) patients. Motor onset seizure was observed in 278 patients (89.6%), while nonmotor seizure included absence, sensory, cognitive, and autonomic seizures. Conclusion The present study showed that all patients could be classified using ILAE 2017 classification system. Majority of seizure were generalized onset, predominantly motor type of seizure with impaired awareness using clinical description of classifying seizure, while focal onset seizure was the majority type of seizure when ancillary information was considered.","PeriodicalId":38086,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Epilepsy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1055/s-0041-1731934","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Epilepsy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1731934","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Epilepsy is a common condition in neurology comprising several electroclinical syndromes and seizure disorders of varying known and unknown etiologies that require variable diagnostic workup, treatment, and have obviously different prognoses. Therefore, for appropriate patient management, the best possible classification system for epilepsy is required. The International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) is continuously working on this with the latest classification provided in 2017. There is little knowledge about seizure type based on newer classification systems in Indian patients. Aims and Objective To test the applicability of the newer ILAE 2017 classification of epilepsy in determining seizure type in Indian patients, with respect to right patient management, the best classification system for epilepsy is necessary. Materials and Methods Prospective data of 310 consecutive patients with seizures presenting in neurology department was collected from December 2017 to June 2018 and analyzed according to the newer systems of classification of seizures proposed by ILAE in 2017. Results All 310 patients in age ranging from one year to 72 years with seizures could be classified according to the ILAE 2017 classification system. Focal onset seizure was noted in 66 patients (21.3%), while 244 patients (78.7%) had generalized onset based on clinical onset of seizure. Awareness was impaired in 262 (84.5%) patients. Motor onset seizure was observed in 278 patients (89.6%), while nonmotor seizure included absence, sensory, cognitive, and autonomic seizures. Conclusion The present study showed that all patients could be classified using ILAE 2017 classification system. Majority of seizure were generalized onset, predominantly motor type of seizure with impaired awareness using clinical description of classifying seizure, while focal onset seizure was the majority type of seizure when ancillary information was considered.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
国际抗癫痫联盟2017年新分类用于确定印度患者癫痫发作类型的验证
摘要简介癫痫是神经病学中的一种常见疾病,包括几种已知和未知病因的临床综合征和癫痫发作障碍,需要不同的诊断、治疗,预后明显不同。因此,为了对患者进行适当的管理,需要最好的癫痫分类系统。国际抗癫痫联盟(ILAE)正在持续研究这一问题,2017年提供了最新分类。印度患者对基于较新分类系统的癫痫发作类型知之甚少。目的和目的为了测试新的ILAE 2017癫痫分类在确定印度患者癫痫发作类型方面的适用性,在正确的患者管理方面,有必要制定最佳的癫痫分类系统。材料与方法收集2017年12月至2018年6月神经内科连续310例癫痫患者的前瞻性数据,并根据ILAE 2017年提出的新的癫痫分类系统进行分析。结果所有310名年龄在1岁至72岁之间的癫痫患者都可以根据ILAE 2017分类系统进行分类。66名患者(21.3%)出现局灶性发作,244名患者(78.7%)根据临床发作情况出现全身性发作。262名(84.5%)患者意识受损。278名患者(89.6%)观察到运动性发作,而非运动性发作包括缺席、感觉、认知和自主神经发作。结论本研究表明,所有患者均可使用ILAE 2017分类系统进行分类。大多数癫痫发作是全身性发作,主要是意识受损的运动型癫痫发作,使用癫痫分类的临床描述,而考虑辅助信息时,局灶性发作是大多数癫痫发作类型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Epilepsy
International Journal of Epilepsy Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
期刊最新文献
Antisense Molecules in Epilepsy—A Neuropharmacological Educational Review The Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Acute Care Setting for Intravenous Levetiracetam (Focale) in Children Reproductive Health of Women with Epilepsy in India: An Observational Study Reassures Me There Are People Around Who Care about Me: Analyzing Meanings of Support for People with Epilepsy Knowledge, Risk Perception, and Reproductive Decision Making among Women with Epilepsy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1