Indians in Apartheid South Africa: class, compromise and controversy in the era of the Group Areas Act, 1952–1962

IF 0.2 Q4 DEMOGRAPHY Diaspora Studies Pub Date : 2021-01-02 DOI:10.1080/09739572.2020.1816801
Suraj Yengde
{"title":"Indians in Apartheid South Africa: class, compromise and controversy in the era of the Group Areas Act, 1952–1962","authors":"Suraj Yengde","doi":"10.1080/09739572.2020.1816801","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This paper looks at the implementation of the notorious Group Areas Act between 1952 and 1962, and the struggle of the Transvaal Indian community in responding to the Act. Since the Group Areas Act threatened the very existence of the Indian community in South Africa, two major Indian bodies – Natal Indian Congress (NIC) and Transvaal Indian Congress (TIC) – played a pivotal role in promoting regional awareness of the Act by organizing important conferences protesting against the Act. The Indian community came together as a unified group to narrate historical atrocities, something that was never discussed among the Indian circles before. There were incidents during the Group Areas Act protest when the Indian community leadership was divided over ideological differences in the Transvaal region. Incidents like these suggest that the unity within the Indian leadership, which is often discussed in the South African race history, was subject to public scrutiny. Drawing upon the archival materials of Transvaal Indian Congress Mass Conference in 1962 and the private papers of prominent Indian figures such as Amina Cachalia and the collections of Hassim Seedat along with in-depth interviews with activists, merchants and residents of Fordsburg, this paper aims to provide exclusive insights into the tactics employed by the Indian organizations in mobilizing against the Act.","PeriodicalId":42341,"journal":{"name":"Diaspora Studies","volume":"14 1","pages":"75 - 96"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/09739572.2020.1816801","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diaspora Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09739572.2020.1816801","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper looks at the implementation of the notorious Group Areas Act between 1952 and 1962, and the struggle of the Transvaal Indian community in responding to the Act. Since the Group Areas Act threatened the very existence of the Indian community in South Africa, two major Indian bodies – Natal Indian Congress (NIC) and Transvaal Indian Congress (TIC) – played a pivotal role in promoting regional awareness of the Act by organizing important conferences protesting against the Act. The Indian community came together as a unified group to narrate historical atrocities, something that was never discussed among the Indian circles before. There were incidents during the Group Areas Act protest when the Indian community leadership was divided over ideological differences in the Transvaal region. Incidents like these suggest that the unity within the Indian leadership, which is often discussed in the South African race history, was subject to public scrutiny. Drawing upon the archival materials of Transvaal Indian Congress Mass Conference in 1962 and the private papers of prominent Indian figures such as Amina Cachalia and the collections of Hassim Seedat along with in-depth interviews with activists, merchants and residents of Fordsburg, this paper aims to provide exclusive insights into the tactics employed by the Indian organizations in mobilizing against the Act.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
种族隔离时期的南非印第安人:1952-1962年《群体地区法》时代的阶级、妥协与争议
本文着眼于1952年至1962年间臭名昭著的《群体地区法》的实施,以及德兰士瓦印度社区在回应该法案时的斗争。由于《群体地区法》威胁到南非印度社区的生存,两个主要的印度机构- -纳塔尔印度人大会和德兰士瓦印度人大会- -通过组织抗议该法案的重要会议,在促进区域对该法案的认识方面发挥了关键作用。印度社区作为一个统一的群体聚集在一起,讲述历史上的暴行,这在印度圈子里以前从未讨论过。在集体地区法抗议期间,德兰士瓦地区的印度社区领导层因意识形态分歧而分裂,发生了一些事件。这些事件表明,在南非种族历史上经常被讨论的印度领导层内部的团结受到了公众的监督。根据1962年德兰士瓦省印度国大党群众大会的档案资料,以及Amina Cachalia等著名印度人物的私人论文和Hassim Seedat的收藏,以及对福特斯堡活动家、商人和居民的深入采访,本文旨在提供印度组织在动员反对该法案时所采用的策略的独家见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Diaspora Studies
Diaspora Studies DEMOGRAPHY-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: Diaspora Studies is the interdisciplinary journal of the Organisation for Diaspora Initiatives (ODI) and is dedicated to publishing academic research on traditional diasporas and international migrants from the perspective of international relations, economics, politics, identity and history. The journal focuses specifically on diasporas and migrants as resources for both home and host countries. The scope of the journal includes the role of diasporas and international migration as important drivers in international relations, in development, and within civil societies. The journal welcomes theoretical and empirical contributions on comparative diasporas and state engagement policies, and aims to further scholarship and debate on emerging global networks and transnational identities. Diaspora Studies publishes: 1. Reviewed research papers 2. Book reviews 3. Conference reports 4. Documents on diaspora policies
期刊最新文献
Going Back to Pre-conflict Identities: The Cypriot Diaspora in the United Kingdom The Imagined Home within the Cham Muslim Diaspora in Cambodia Trapped in Time and Place: Cognitive Immobility among Diaspora Communities ‘We Still Exist’: The Social Suffering and Social Movement of Singkhon, the Siamese Diaspora Living on the Thai-Myanmar Border ‘It was painful then, but I can laugh about it now’: Lived Experiences of First-year Immigrant Teachers from African Countries Working in Florida Public Schools
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1