Perceived Healthiness of Breakfasts in Women with Overweight or Obesity Match Expert Recommendations

A. Laguna-Camacho, Eva García-Manjarrez, Mallory Frayn, B. Knäuper, M. V. Domínguez-García, Ericka Escalante-Izeta
{"title":"Perceived Healthiness of Breakfasts in Women with Overweight or Obesity Match Expert Recommendations","authors":"A. Laguna-Camacho, Eva García-Manjarrez, Mallory Frayn, B. Knäuper, M. V. Domínguez-García, Ericka Escalante-Izeta","doi":"10.1515/psych-2018-0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The aim of the present study was to examine the perceived healthiness of breakfasts and the underlying beliefs influencing that perception against expert nutritional evaluation. Women with overweight or obesity (N = 120) were asked to recall the food items they consumed during a recent “healthy” or “unhealthy” breakfast. They also reported why the breakfast was healthy or unhealthy and rated its healthiness. Two nutritionists categorised the beliefs about why the breakfasts were “healthy” or “unhealthy” and evaluated the healthiness of each breakfast following nutrition guidelines. Generally, the meals considered as healthy versus unhealthy breakfasts and related beliefs about why the breakfasts were healthy or unhealthy matched food-based nutrition guidelines. Participants were found to perceive healthy breakfasts as more healthy and unhealthy breakfasts as less healthy than nutritionists did. Participants frequently mentioned the belief that their breakfast was healthy because “it contained fruit” or that their breakfast was unhealthy because “it contained fat.” Such salient healthy or unhealthy food items may guide the perception of breakfast healthiness and could be a target for nutrition counselling.","PeriodicalId":74357,"journal":{"name":"Open psychology","volume":"1 1","pages":"25 - 35"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/psych-2018-0003","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/psych-2018-0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Abstract The aim of the present study was to examine the perceived healthiness of breakfasts and the underlying beliefs influencing that perception against expert nutritional evaluation. Women with overweight or obesity (N = 120) were asked to recall the food items they consumed during a recent “healthy” or “unhealthy” breakfast. They also reported why the breakfast was healthy or unhealthy and rated its healthiness. Two nutritionists categorised the beliefs about why the breakfasts were “healthy” or “unhealthy” and evaluated the healthiness of each breakfast following nutrition guidelines. Generally, the meals considered as healthy versus unhealthy breakfasts and related beliefs about why the breakfasts were healthy or unhealthy matched food-based nutrition guidelines. Participants were found to perceive healthy breakfasts as more healthy and unhealthy breakfasts as less healthy than nutritionists did. Participants frequently mentioned the belief that their breakfast was healthy because “it contained fruit” or that their breakfast was unhealthy because “it contained fat.” Such salient healthy or unhealthy food items may guide the perception of breakfast healthiness and could be a target for nutrition counselling.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超重或肥胖妇女对早餐健康的感知与专家建议相符
摘要本研究的目的是检验早餐的健康感知和潜在的信念影响这种看法与专家营养评估。超重或肥胖的女性(N = 120)被要求回忆她们在最近的“健康”或“不健康”早餐中食用的食物。他们还报告了早餐健康或不健康的原因,并对其健康程度进行了评级。两位营养学家对早餐“健康”或“不健康”的原因进行了分类,并根据营养指南评估了每种早餐的健康程度。一般来说,被认为是健康早餐和不健康早餐的膳食,以及关于为什么早餐是健康的或不健康的相关信念,与基于食物的营养指南相匹配。研究发现,与营养学家相比,参与者认为健康早餐更健康,而不健康早餐则不健康。参与者经常提到他们的早餐是健康的,因为“它含有水果”,或者他们的早餐是不健康的,因为“它含有脂肪”。这些突出的健康或不健康食品可能会引导人们对早餐健康的看法,并可能成为营养咨询的目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
27 weeks
期刊最新文献
“I Have Some Serious Doubts About this Vaccine…” – Generic Conspiracy Beliefs Predict the Acceptance of the Covid-19 Vaccination Features of Two Embodied Processes in Spatial Perspective-Taking Across the Lifespan Influences of Music Reading on Auditory Chord Discrimination: A Novel Test Bed for Nonconscious Processing of Irrelevant Prime Meaning Contextual Specificity of (Un)Healthy Food/Drink Intake in Everyday Life: A Study Based on Episodic Memories No Effect of Forest Representations on State Anxiety, Actual and Perceived Noise
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1