The effects of individual moral inclinations on group moral conformity

I.Z. Marton-Alper , A. Sobeh , S.G. Shamay-Tsoory
{"title":"The effects of individual moral inclinations on group moral conformity","authors":"I.Z. Marton-Alper ,&nbsp;A. Sobeh ,&nbsp;S.G. Shamay-Tsoory","doi":"10.1016/j.crbeha.2022.100078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Conformity has been shown to affect behaviors ranging from attitudes to moral decisions. The current research examined how individual moral inclination (i.e., utilitarian vs. deontological) affects moral conformity in online settings. To this end we designed a trolley-like moral dilemma paradigm in which participants rated moral decisions both individually and after being exposed to other people's ratings. We validated the task with 363 participants, demonstrating that in online settings individuals tend to conform to the group's moral judgments. Using an additional 346 participants, we showed that individual differences influence the conformity tendency, such that people with utilitarian inclinations conform to a greater extent and more frequently than people with deontological inclinations. We conclude that people with prior utilitarian inclinations are more disposed to moral conformity.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72746,"journal":{"name":"Current research in behavioral sciences","volume":"3 ","pages":"Article 100078"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666518222000134/pdfft?md5=edfaa07c3ad5341ec106bfbee3f893ad&pid=1-s2.0-S2666518222000134-main.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current research in behavioral sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666518222000134","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Conformity has been shown to affect behaviors ranging from attitudes to moral decisions. The current research examined how individual moral inclination (i.e., utilitarian vs. deontological) affects moral conformity in online settings. To this end we designed a trolley-like moral dilemma paradigm in which participants rated moral decisions both individually and after being exposed to other people's ratings. We validated the task with 363 participants, demonstrating that in online settings individuals tend to conform to the group's moral judgments. Using an additional 346 participants, we showed that individual differences influence the conformity tendency, such that people with utilitarian inclinations conform to a greater extent and more frequently than people with deontological inclinations. We conclude that people with prior utilitarian inclinations are more disposed to moral conformity.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
个体道德倾向对群体道德从众的影响
从众已被证明会影响从态度到道德决策的各种行为。目前的研究考察了个人道德倾向(即功利主义与义务论)如何影响网络环境中的道德一致性。为此,我们设计了一个类似电车的道德困境范式,在这个范式中,参与者分别对自己的道德决策和在看到其他人的评级后对道德决策进行评级。我们用363名参与者验证了这个任务,证明在网络环境中,个人倾向于遵守群体的道德判断。通过对另外346名参与者的研究,我们发现个体差异会影响从众倾向,例如,具有功利主义倾向的人比具有义务论倾向的人在更大程度上和更频繁地从众。我们的结论是,具有先验功利倾向的人更倾向于道德遵从。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Current research in behavioral sciences
Current research in behavioral sciences Behavioral Neuroscience
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
40 days
期刊最新文献
When a bright future is in mind: Young adults’ positive views on aging contribute to resilience through enhanced sense of control Attitudes towards invisible disabilities: Evidence from behavioral tendencies The stress-busting power of Digital Self-Efficacy: Does training format matter for workers? Semantic analysis of test items through large language model embeddings predicts a-priori factorial structure of personality tests Exploring sensory processing sensitivity: Relationships with mental and somatic health, interactions with positive and negative environments, and evidence for differential susceptibility
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1