Students’ Vocabulary Knowledge: Comparative Study Enhancing Between Semantic Mapping and Diglot Weave Techniques

Acuity Pub Date : 2018-08-01 DOI:10.35974/ACUITY.V3I2.671
Olivia Virocky Simanjuntak, D. C. Simanjuntak
{"title":"Students’ Vocabulary Knowledge: Comparative Study Enhancing Between Semantic Mapping and Diglot Weave Techniques","authors":"Olivia Virocky Simanjuntak, D. C. Simanjuntak","doi":"10.35974/ACUITY.V3I2.671","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study is to find out whether there is any significant difference between Semantic Mapping and Diglot Weave Techniques in enhancing the students’ vocabulary knowledge. This study is quantitative, utilizing comparative research design—a simple research design which is used to examine two techniques of teaching. In this study, the researcher treated two groups with two different techniques: Semantic Mapping and Diglot Weave. Each technique is deemed to be comparable in enhancing students’ vocabulary knowledge. On the basis of the target this study, the researcher has to decide which technique that is more effective in enhancing students’ vocabulary knowledge. The researcher found out that there is significant difference between group that was taught using Semantic Mapping technique and group that was taught using Diglot Weave Technique in enhancing students’ vocabulary knowledge. In fact, the group that acquired Diglot Weave Technique had higher gain of score than the group that acquired Semantic Mapping.Keyword - Semantic Mapping Technique, Diglot Weave Technique, Vocabulary Knowledge","PeriodicalId":33744,"journal":{"name":"Acuity","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acuity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35974/ACUITY.V3I2.671","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to find out whether there is any significant difference between Semantic Mapping and Diglot Weave Techniques in enhancing the students’ vocabulary knowledge. This study is quantitative, utilizing comparative research design—a simple research design which is used to examine two techniques of teaching. In this study, the researcher treated two groups with two different techniques: Semantic Mapping and Diglot Weave. Each technique is deemed to be comparable in enhancing students’ vocabulary knowledge. On the basis of the target this study, the researcher has to decide which technique that is more effective in enhancing students’ vocabulary knowledge. The researcher found out that there is significant difference between group that was taught using Semantic Mapping technique and group that was taught using Diglot Weave Technique in enhancing students’ vocabulary knowledge. In fact, the group that acquired Diglot Weave Technique had higher gain of score than the group that acquired Semantic Mapping.Keyword - Semantic Mapping Technique, Diglot Weave Technique, Vocabulary Knowledge
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学生€™词汇知识:语义映射和Diglot编织技术之间的比较研究增强
本研究的目的是为了了解语义映射和Diglot Weave技术在提高学生的€™词汇知识方面是否存在显著差异。这项研究是定量的,利用比较研究设计 -一种简单的研究设计,用于检查两种教学技术。在这项研究中,研究人员用两种不同的技术处理两组:语义映射和Diglot Weave。在提高学生的词汇知识方面,每种技巧都被认为是可比性的。在本研究目标的基础上,研究者必须决定哪种技术更有效地提高学生的词汇知识。研究者发现,使用语义映射技术的教学组与使用Diglot Weave技术的教学组在提高学生的€™词汇知识方面存在显著差异。事实上,习得Diglot Weave技术的组比习得语义映射的组得分更高。关键词-语义映射技术,Diglot编织技术,词汇知识
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
A Cross-National Investigation of Cultural Representations in Iranian and Turkish ELT Coursebooks Longing for Symbolic Capital in Toni Morrison’s The Bluest Eye: A Bourdieun Estimation Age, Gender, and Anxiety as Antecedents of Willingness to Communicate: Turkish EFL Context Learning Styles and Attitude toward Achievement among English Second Language Students The Effect of Using De-contextualization and Semi-Contextualization Teaching Techniques on Turkish EFL Learners’ Vocabulary Learning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1