Non-Separable Preferences in the Statistical Analysis of Roll Call Votes

IF 4.7 2区 社会学 Q1 POLITICAL SCIENCE Political Analysis Pub Date : 2022-05-24 DOI:10.1017/pan.2022.11
Garret Binding, Lukas F. Stoetzer
{"title":"Non-Separable Preferences in the Statistical Analysis of Roll Call Votes","authors":"Garret Binding, Lukas F. Stoetzer","doi":"10.1017/pan.2022.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Conventional multidimensional statistical models of roll call votes assume that legislators’ preferences are additively separable over dimensions. In this article, we introduce an item response model of roll call votes that allows for non-separability over latent dimensions. Conceptually, non-separability matters if outcomes over dimensions are related rather than independent in legislators’ decisions. Monte Carlo simulations highlight that separable item response models of roll call votes capture non-separability via correlated ideal points and higher salience of a primary dimension. We apply our model to the U.S. Senate and the European Parliament. In both settings, we find that legislators’ preferences over two basic dimensions are non-separable. These results have general implications for our understanding of legislative decision-making, as well as for empirical descriptions of preferences in legislatures.","PeriodicalId":48270,"journal":{"name":"Political Analysis","volume":"31 1","pages":"352 - 365"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Political Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/pan.2022.11","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Abstract Conventional multidimensional statistical models of roll call votes assume that legislators’ preferences are additively separable over dimensions. In this article, we introduce an item response model of roll call votes that allows for non-separability over latent dimensions. Conceptually, non-separability matters if outcomes over dimensions are related rather than independent in legislators’ decisions. Monte Carlo simulations highlight that separable item response models of roll call votes capture non-separability via correlated ideal points and higher salience of a primary dimension. We apply our model to the U.S. Senate and the European Parliament. In both settings, we find that legislators’ preferences over two basic dimensions are non-separable. These results have general implications for our understanding of legislative decision-making, as well as for empirical descriptions of preferences in legislatures.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
点名投票统计分析中的不可分离偏好
传统的唱名投票多维统计模型假设立法者的偏好在维度上是可加分离的。在本文中,我们引入了一个允许潜在维度不可分性的点名投票项目响应模型。从概念上讲,如果在立法者的决定中,维度上的结果是相关的,而不是独立的,那么不可分离性就很重要。蒙特卡罗模拟强调了点名投票的可分离项目反应模型通过相关的理想点和初级维度的更高显着性来捕获不可分离性。我们将我们的模型应用于美国参议院和欧洲议会。在这两种情况下,我们发现立法者在两个基本维度上的偏好是不可分离的。这些结果对我们对立法决策的理解以及对立法机构偏好的经验描述具有一般意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Political Analysis
Political Analysis POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
3.70%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: Political Analysis chronicles these exciting developments by publishing the most sophisticated scholarship in the field. It is the place to learn new methods, to find some of the best empirical scholarship, and to publish your best research.
期刊最新文献
Assessing Performance of Martins's and Sampson's Formulae for Calculation of LDL-C in Indian Population: A Single Center Retrospective Study. On Finetuning Large Language Models Explaining Recruitment to Extremism: A Bayesian Hierarchical Case–Control Approach Implementation Matters: Evaluating the Proportional Hazard Test’s Performance Face Detection, Tracking, and Classification from Large-Scale News Archives for Analysis of Key Political Figures
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1