Building rating system: an instrument for building accessibility measurement for better indoor navigation by blind people

IF 1.7 Q2 REHABILITATION Journal of Enabling Technologies Pub Date : 2019-08-06 DOI:10.1108/JET-12-2018-0060
Watthanasak Jeamwatthanachai, M. Wald, G. Wills
{"title":"Building rating system: an instrument for building accessibility measurement for better indoor navigation by blind people","authors":"Watthanasak Jeamwatthanachai, M. Wald, G. Wills","doi":"10.1108/JET-12-2018-0060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe purpose of this paper is to create a building rating system (BRS) with its bottom-up design model that can be carried out manually and in the future automatically.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe BRS is built on the basis of the structure of spatial representation framework for indoor navigation by people with visual impairment, which was validated with visually impaired people, and incorporated with building design standards and regulations from around the world. The BRS was afterwards validated by three groups of five experts in the related fields such as research and development, accessibility, and building and interior designs. Finally, the user evaluation was carried out by three focus groups of three experts in risk assessment to verify the usability of the system.\n\n\nFindings\nThis paper provides the design and methodology of the BRS used for classifying the accessibility in buildings into four levels of classification for people with visual impairment navigating around the buildings. This system is evaluated with system usability scales (SUS), which is found to be in a “Good” level on average (72.2 SUS scores).\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nSuccess criteria used in the space classification are mainly created for people with visual impairment at this stage; other disabilities requirements must be taken into account for the next stage of the development.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThe system can be carried out in the future automatically in the form of standalone software or plugins that can be integrated in buildings and interior design software to seek recommendations toward a creation of inclusive built environment.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis paper presents a design architecture of BRS with its details, description and success criteria used in the space classification.\n","PeriodicalId":42168,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Enabling Technologies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/JET-12-2018-0060","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Enabling Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/JET-12-2018-0060","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to create a building rating system (BRS) with its bottom-up design model that can be carried out manually and in the future automatically. Design/methodology/approach The BRS is built on the basis of the structure of spatial representation framework for indoor navigation by people with visual impairment, which was validated with visually impaired people, and incorporated with building design standards and regulations from around the world. The BRS was afterwards validated by three groups of five experts in the related fields such as research and development, accessibility, and building and interior designs. Finally, the user evaluation was carried out by three focus groups of three experts in risk assessment to verify the usability of the system. Findings This paper provides the design and methodology of the BRS used for classifying the accessibility in buildings into four levels of classification for people with visual impairment navigating around the buildings. This system is evaluated with system usability scales (SUS), which is found to be in a “Good” level on average (72.2 SUS scores). Research limitations/implications Success criteria used in the space classification are mainly created for people with visual impairment at this stage; other disabilities requirements must be taken into account for the next stage of the development. Practical implications The system can be carried out in the future automatically in the form of standalone software or plugins that can be integrated in buildings and interior design software to seek recommendations toward a creation of inclusive built environment. Originality/value This paper presents a design architecture of BRS with its details, description and success criteria used in the space classification.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
建筑物评级系统:一种测量建筑物无障碍性的仪器,盲人可以更好地进行室内导航
目的本文的目的是创建一个具有自下而上设计模型的建筑评级系统(BRS),该系统可以手动执行,将来也可以自动执行。设计/方法论/方法BRS建立在视觉障碍者室内导航的空间表示框架结构的基础上,该框架在视觉障碍人群中进行了验证,并与世界各地的建筑设计标准和法规相结合。BRS随后由三个由五名专家组成的小组在相关领域进行了验证,如研发、无障碍、建筑和室内设计。最后,由三名风险评估专家组成的三个重点小组对用户进行了评估,以验证系统的可用性。发现本文提供了BRS的设计和方法,用于将建筑物中的无障碍性分为四个级别,供视障人士在建筑物周围导航。该系统使用系统可用性量表(SUS)进行评估,该量表平均处于“良好”水平(72.2 SUS分数)。研究局限性/含义空间分类中使用的成功标准主要针对这一阶段的视力障碍者;在下一阶段的开发中,必须考虑其他残疾要求。实际含义该系统可以在未来以独立软件或插件的形式自动执行,这些软件或插件可以集成在建筑和室内设计软件中,以寻求创建包容性建筑环境的建议。创意/价值本文提出了BRS的设计架构,包括其细节、描述和用于空间分类的成功标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
21
期刊介绍: The Journal of Enabling Technologies (JET) seeks to provide a strong, insightful, international, and multi-disciplinary evidence-base in health, social care, and education. This focus is applied to how technologies can be enabling for children, young people and adults in varied and different aspects of their lives. The focus remains firmly on reporting innovations around how technologies are used and evaluated in practice, and the impact that they have on the people using them. In addition, the journal has a keen focus on drawing out practical implications for users and how/why technology may have a positive impact. This includes messages for users, practitioners, researchers, stakeholders and caregivers (in the broadest sense). The impact of research in this arena is vital and therefore we are committed to publishing work that helps draw this out; thus providing implications for practice. JET aims to raise awareness of available and developing technologies and their uses in health, social care and education for a wide and varied readership. The areas in which technologies can be enabling for the scope of JET include, but are not limited to: Communication and interaction, Learning, Independence and autonomy, Identity and culture, Safety, Health, Care and support, Wellbeing, Quality of life, Access to services.
期刊最新文献
Use of artificial intelligence (AI) in augmentative and alternative communication (AAC): community consultation on risks, benefits and the need for a code of practice The application of Gen-AI and creativity in the context of public education in frontier environments Use of artificial intelligence (AI) in augmentative and alternative communication (AAC): community consultation on risks, benefits and the need for a code of practice The application of Gen-AI and creativity in the context of public education in frontier environments Video-based instruction for career development for a learner with Autism Spectrum Disorder: a case study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1