{"title":"Who’s speaking for whom?","authors":"Mingjian Xiang, Esther Pascual, Bosen Ma","doi":"10.1075/jhp.18013.xia","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This paper deals with rhetorically intended questions in the Zhuangzi, a foundational text of\n Daoism (fourth century bc). Such questions are generally meant to evoke silent answers in the addressee’s mind, thereby\n involving a fictive type of interaction (Pascual 2006, 2014). We analyse rhetorical questions as constructions of intersubjectivity (see Verhagen 2005, 2008), involving not just a conceptual\n integration of question and assertion but also a viewpoint blend (Dancygier and Sweetser [eds]\n 2012). They involve fusing the perspectives of the writer, the assumed prospective readers, and possibly also that of\n the discourse characters (in the case of rhetorical questions ascribed to a discourse character but meant to represent the\n writer’s voice). In this highly influential text with abundant mixed viewpoint scenarios, the interpretation of rhetorical\n questions involves the resolution of different viewpoints, which are set up and shifted in a multi-layered manner for particular\n argumentative purposes.","PeriodicalId":54081,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Historical Pragmatics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Historical Pragmatics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.18013.xia","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
This paper deals with rhetorically intended questions in the Zhuangzi, a foundational text of
Daoism (fourth century bc). Such questions are generally meant to evoke silent answers in the addressee’s mind, thereby
involving a fictive type of interaction (Pascual 2006, 2014). We analyse rhetorical questions as constructions of intersubjectivity (see Verhagen 2005, 2008), involving not just a conceptual
integration of question and assertion but also a viewpoint blend (Dancygier and Sweetser [eds]
2012). They involve fusing the perspectives of the writer, the assumed prospective readers, and possibly also that of
the discourse characters (in the case of rhetorical questions ascribed to a discourse character but meant to represent the
writer’s voice). In this highly influential text with abundant mixed viewpoint scenarios, the interpretation of rhetorical
questions involves the resolution of different viewpoints, which are set up and shifted in a multi-layered manner for particular
argumentative purposes.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Historical Pragmatics provides an interdisciplinary forum for theoretical, empirical and methodological work at the intersection of pragmatics and historical linguistics. The editorial focus is on socio-historical and pragmatic aspects of historical texts in their sociocultural context of communication (e.g. conversational principles, politeness strategies, or speech acts) and on diachronic pragmatics as seen in linguistic processes such as grammaticalization or discoursization. Contributions draw on data from literary or non-literary sources and from any language. In addition to contributions with a strictly pragmatic or discourse analytical perspective, it also includes contributions with a more sociolinguistic or semantic approach.