Book Review: Ruth Page, David Barton, Carmen Lee, Johann Wolfgang Unger, and Michele Zappavigna, Researching Language and Social Media: A Student Guide

IF 1.4 2区 文学 Q2 COMMUNICATION Discourse Studies Pub Date : 2023-04-05 DOI:10.1177/14614456231166221
Salla Kangas
{"title":"Book Review: Ruth Page, David Barton, Carmen Lee, Johann Wolfgang Unger, and Michele Zappavigna, Researching Language and Social Media: A Student Guide","authors":"Salla Kangas","doi":"10.1177/14614456231166221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"socio-semioticians in creating, witnessing, describing, labelling, supporting or opposing, and legitimating and negotiating semiotic practices (p. 264). In summary, this volume conducts a systemic analysis of the pandemic’s effects on communicative patterns, functions, strategies, technologies, meanings and purposes across political, economic and social dimensions, which are likely to be continued because of the possibility of the continuation of the pandemic. It provides readers with an opportunity to consider and prepare for issues involving multimodal communication that will likely arise in similar situations to come (p. 11). Despite these strengths, the volume has room for minor improvement. As far as research methods are concerned, this volume has confined itself to the case study of a country. It cannot be denied that this can be an important path for introducing how discourses, modes and media pertaining to the COVID-19 pandemic affected daily lives of people in a certain country in terms of the various meanings they carry. However, adding a contrastive perspective by analysing discourses in different countries would have helped to reveal the similarities and differences of multimodal meaning building mechanisms in different regions, and the characteristics of the narrative mode and discourse strategy of the mainstream media of a country in reporting news about the coronavirus and the pandemic in other countries. Overall, this volume provides an enlightening and innovative perspective for multimodal discourse research. The research is based on a linguistic-theory-motivated and interdisciplinary model, which can not only guide the innovation of multimodal discourse research, but also promote the coordinated development of humanities and social sciences and other sciences. It is highly recommended for any reader interested in the field of multimodal discourse analysis or other fields whose work focuses on the use of multimodal discourse for communication and meaning making.","PeriodicalId":47598,"journal":{"name":"Discourse Studies","volume":"25 1","pages":"720 - 722"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Discourse Studies","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14614456231166221","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

socio-semioticians in creating, witnessing, describing, labelling, supporting or opposing, and legitimating and negotiating semiotic practices (p. 264). In summary, this volume conducts a systemic analysis of the pandemic’s effects on communicative patterns, functions, strategies, technologies, meanings and purposes across political, economic and social dimensions, which are likely to be continued because of the possibility of the continuation of the pandemic. It provides readers with an opportunity to consider and prepare for issues involving multimodal communication that will likely arise in similar situations to come (p. 11). Despite these strengths, the volume has room for minor improvement. As far as research methods are concerned, this volume has confined itself to the case study of a country. It cannot be denied that this can be an important path for introducing how discourses, modes and media pertaining to the COVID-19 pandemic affected daily lives of people in a certain country in terms of the various meanings they carry. However, adding a contrastive perspective by analysing discourses in different countries would have helped to reveal the similarities and differences of multimodal meaning building mechanisms in different regions, and the characteristics of the narrative mode and discourse strategy of the mainstream media of a country in reporting news about the coronavirus and the pandemic in other countries. Overall, this volume provides an enlightening and innovative perspective for multimodal discourse research. The research is based on a linguistic-theory-motivated and interdisciplinary model, which can not only guide the innovation of multimodal discourse research, but also promote the coordinated development of humanities and social sciences and other sciences. It is highly recommended for any reader interested in the field of multimodal discourse analysis or other fields whose work focuses on the use of multimodal discourse for communication and meaning making.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
书评:Ruth Page、David Barton、Carmen Lee、Johann Wolfgang Unger和Michele Zappavigna,《研究语言和社交媒体:学生指南》
社会符号学家创造、见证、描述、标记、支持或反对符号实践,以及使符号实践合法化和协商(第264页)。总之,本卷对疫情对政治、经济和社会层面的沟通模式、功能、策略、技术、意义和目的的影响进行了系统分析,由于疫情持续的可能性,这些影响可能会持续下去。它为读者提供了一个机会,让他们思考和准备在未来类似情况下可能出现的涉及多式联运的问题(第11页)。尽管有这些优势,但销量仍有小幅提升的空间。就研究方法而言,本卷仅限于一个国家的案例研究。不可否认,这可能是介绍与新冠肺炎大流行有关的话语、模式和媒体如何影响某个国家人民的日常生活的重要途径。然而,通过分析不同国家的话语来增加对比视角,将有助于揭示不同地区多模式意义构建机制的异同,以及一个国家主流媒体在报道其他国家有关冠状病毒和疫情的新闻时的叙事模式和话语策略的特点。总的来说,本卷为多模态话语研究提供了一个富有启发性和创新性的视角。该研究基于语言学理论驱动的跨学科模式,不仅可以指导多模态话语研究的创新,还可以促进人文社会科学与其他科学的协调发展。强烈推荐任何对多模态话语分析或其他领域感兴趣的读者,他们的工作重点是使用多模态话语进行交流和意义创造。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Discourse Studies
Discourse Studies COMMUNICATION-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
62
期刊介绍: Discourse Studies is a multidisciplinary peer-reviewed journal for the study of text and talk. Publishing outstanding work on the structures and strategies of written and spoken discourse, special attention is given to cross-disciplinary studies of text and talk in linguistics, anthropology, ethnomethodology, cognitive and social psychology, communication studies and law.
期刊最新文献
Scaling the value of multilingualism: ‘Common-sense’ narratives of growth and inequality in an expert report to the U.S. Congress Prospective expertise: The use of ‘listen’ in the discourse of television sports pundits Introduction to “scaling stories: Narratives and the dialogic regimentation of scales” Constructing cancel culture: Strategic scaling in stories of “cancellation” Bonding with followers: Chronotopes and scales in political communication on Instagram
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1