Status Complicated: In Zambia, China-Africa Is a Partnership Washington Should Not Necessarily Envy

IF 1.3 Asia Policy Pub Date : 2022-07-01 DOI:10.1353/asp.2022.0048
Chiponda Chimbelu
{"title":"Status Complicated: In Zambia, China-Africa Is a Partnership Washington Should Not Necessarily Envy","authors":"Chiponda Chimbelu","doi":"10.1353/asp.2022.0048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"T o better understand how Africans feel about China’s growing presence and influence on the continent, it is important to look both at the headlines and beyond them to explain how ordinary people may be interpreting events and forming opinions. This essay homes in on one country, Zambia, to try to better understand public perceptions about Chinese engagement. Measured in per capita terms, this southern African country is one of the leading destinations for Chinese investment. The growing presence of Chinese citizens in Zambia, along with their money and involvement in different areas of the economy, has caused controversy and even tragedy, including the loss of both Chinese and Zambian lives. In May 2020, three Chinese nationals were murdered by locals in the Zambian capital Lusaka. The attack followed repeated media reports of Chinese employers allegedly making workers stay on business premises for weeks to maintain production during the country’s first Covid-19 lockdown. The then mayor of Lusaka, Miles Sampa, was accused of stoking anti-China sentiment prior to the attack by blaming China for the Covid-19 pandemic and participating in raids on Chinese-owned businesses. He claimed he had uncovered labor abuses and discrimination against Zambians, describing their working conditions as “slavery.” Sampa also used racist language in videos of the raids that were posted on Facebook. Sampa later apologized for his actions and language in a statement to the media and assured foreign investors that his office would “support their businesses 100%.”1 But it is highly unlikely his apology ameliorated any damage he may have caused. Chinese involvement in Zambia was fraught long before he became mayor, mostly over issues regarding the treatment of Zambian workers by Chinese employers, which have been covered by both local and international media. In 2011, Human Rights Watch released a damning report that detailed abuse at Chinese-owned copper mines in","PeriodicalId":53442,"journal":{"name":"Asia Policy","volume":"29 1","pages":"61 - 69"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/asp.2022.0048","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

T o better understand how Africans feel about China’s growing presence and influence on the continent, it is important to look both at the headlines and beyond them to explain how ordinary people may be interpreting events and forming opinions. This essay homes in on one country, Zambia, to try to better understand public perceptions about Chinese engagement. Measured in per capita terms, this southern African country is one of the leading destinations for Chinese investment. The growing presence of Chinese citizens in Zambia, along with their money and involvement in different areas of the economy, has caused controversy and even tragedy, including the loss of both Chinese and Zambian lives. In May 2020, three Chinese nationals were murdered by locals in the Zambian capital Lusaka. The attack followed repeated media reports of Chinese employers allegedly making workers stay on business premises for weeks to maintain production during the country’s first Covid-19 lockdown. The then mayor of Lusaka, Miles Sampa, was accused of stoking anti-China sentiment prior to the attack by blaming China for the Covid-19 pandemic and participating in raids on Chinese-owned businesses. He claimed he had uncovered labor abuses and discrimination against Zambians, describing their working conditions as “slavery.” Sampa also used racist language in videos of the raids that were posted on Facebook. Sampa later apologized for his actions and language in a statement to the media and assured foreign investors that his office would “support their businesses 100%.”1 But it is highly unlikely his apology ameliorated any damage he may have caused. Chinese involvement in Zambia was fraught long before he became mayor, mostly over issues regarding the treatment of Zambian workers by Chinese employers, which have been covered by both local and international media. In 2011, Human Rights Watch released a damning report that detailed abuse at Chinese-owned copper mines in
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
现状复杂:在赞比亚,中非是华盛顿不应该羡慕的伙伴关系
为了更好地了解非洲人对中国在非洲大陆日益增长的存在和影响力的感受,重要的是要看看头条新闻和其他新闻,解释普通人是如何解读事件和形成观点的。这篇文章聚焦于一个国家赞比亚,试图更好地理解公众对中国参与的看法。按人均计算,这个南部非洲国家是中国投资的主要目的地之一。中国公民在赞比亚日益增多,加上他们的资金和对不同经济领域的参与,引发了争议甚至悲剧,包括中国人和赞比亚人的生命损失。2020年5月,三名中国公民在赞比亚首都卢萨卡被当地人杀害。此前,媒体多次报道称,在中国首次新冠肺炎封锁期间,中国雇主据称让工人在营业场所逗留数周以维持生产。当时的卢萨卡市长迈尔斯·桑帕被指控在袭击发生前煽动反华情绪,将新冠肺炎疫情归咎于中国,并参与对中国企业的袭击。他声称自己揭露了对赞比亚人的劳工虐待和歧视,称他们的工作条件是“奴隶制”。桑帕还在脸书上发布的突袭视频中使用了种族主义语言。桑帕后来在向媒体发表的一份声明中为自己的行为和语言道歉,并向外国投资者保证,他的办公室将“100%支持他们的业务”。1但他的道歉极不可能减轻他可能造成的任何损害。早在他成为赞比亚市长之前,中国对赞比亚的参与就很紧张,主要是因为中国雇主对待赞比亚工人的问题,当地和国际媒体都对这些问题进行了报道。2011年,人权观察发布了一份谴责性报告,详细描述了中国拥有的铜矿在
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Asia Policy
Asia Policy Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
55
期刊介绍: Asia Policy is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal presenting policy-relevant academic research on the Asia-Pacific that draws clear and concise conclusions useful to today’s policymakers.
期刊最新文献
Essence of Indecision: Understanding Indian Security Policy Choices Ambiguity and Decarbonization Pathways in Southeast Asia Gambling on India's Foreign Policy: The Importance of Implementation Introduction: Diplomacy and Ambiguity—Constructing Interests in Cooperation Ambiguity and National Interests: Foreign Policy Frames and U.S.-China Relations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1