Methicillin, β-lactams, and clindamycin resistance profiles of Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from patients with UTI in Bechar province (Algeria)

E. Benyagoub
{"title":"Methicillin, β-lactams, and clindamycin resistance profiles of Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from patients with UTI in Bechar province (Algeria)","authors":"E. Benyagoub","doi":"10.2174/2211352521666230822104016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nStaphylococcus aureus is a bacterial pathogen responsible for many diseases. Multidrug resistance in S aureus has become common worldwide and is a serious clinical issue in the treatment and care of S. aureus-infected patients. S. aureus uropathogenic strains isolated from patients with UTI in Bechar province (Algeria) were phenotypically identified and evaluated for multiple drug resistance (MDR) patterns against recommended antimicrobial drugs.\n\n\n\nThrough selective media, the uropathogenic S. aureus strains were isolated by analyzing a total of 211 urine samples, then subjected to various biochemical identification tests. Multidrug resistance pattern (MRSA, MLSB, and β-lactamase production) among Staphylococcus aureus uropathogenic strains was performed using phenotypic tests.\nA total of 50 S. aureus strains were isolated, i.e., 40,48% of all the isolated uropathogenic agents estimated at 126 isolates. More than 69% of the women had a urinary tract infection, i.e., a sex ratio (SR) of 0,43. The susceptibility test results showed that the isolated S. aureus strains were resistant to various antibiotics of the β-lactams class (penicillin, cefoxitin, and oxacillin) and were susceptible to gentamicin, chloramphenicol, co-trimoxazole, vancomycin, ofloxacin, and ciprofloxacin. Cefoxitin disk diffusion and agar screening tests showed that all the isolated S. aureus strains were qualified as MRSA at the rate of 100% (50/50), whereas a rate of 74% (37/50) was granted to MRSA using oxacillin disk diffusion test. The highest percentage of MDR-MRSA was observed in class three of antibiotics 12 (24%). The lowest percentage was observed in classes 8 and 9 of antibiotics 1 (2%). For MDR-MRSA, the MAR index ranged from 0,27 to 1,0.\n\n\n\nPenicillin disk diffusion (DD) and DDST (PI/PIT) tests showed a production rate of β-lactamase in the range of 94 and 80%, respectively. 85,1% (40/50) of penicillin-resistant strains were positive for DDST. Thus, the D-test among MRSA strains shows a rate of 38% (19/50) of cMLSB and no strain attributed to the iMLSB phenotype.\n\n\n\nThis is an alarming rate, confirming the concern that is still being discussed within the medical teams of the national health sector as well as the Algerian antimicrobial resistance network, which requires prompt intervention to update a new strategy to fight antimicrobial resistance.\n","PeriodicalId":7951,"journal":{"name":"Anti-Infective Agents","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anti-Infective Agents","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/2211352521666230822104016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Staphylococcus aureus is a bacterial pathogen responsible for many diseases. Multidrug resistance in S aureus has become common worldwide and is a serious clinical issue in the treatment and care of S. aureus-infected patients. S. aureus uropathogenic strains isolated from patients with UTI in Bechar province (Algeria) were phenotypically identified and evaluated for multiple drug resistance (MDR) patterns against recommended antimicrobial drugs. Through selective media, the uropathogenic S. aureus strains were isolated by analyzing a total of 211 urine samples, then subjected to various biochemical identification tests. Multidrug resistance pattern (MRSA, MLSB, and β-lactamase production) among Staphylococcus aureus uropathogenic strains was performed using phenotypic tests. A total of 50 S. aureus strains were isolated, i.e., 40,48% of all the isolated uropathogenic agents estimated at 126 isolates. More than 69% of the women had a urinary tract infection, i.e., a sex ratio (SR) of 0,43. The susceptibility test results showed that the isolated S. aureus strains were resistant to various antibiotics of the β-lactams class (penicillin, cefoxitin, and oxacillin) and were susceptible to gentamicin, chloramphenicol, co-trimoxazole, vancomycin, ofloxacin, and ciprofloxacin. Cefoxitin disk diffusion and agar screening tests showed that all the isolated S. aureus strains were qualified as MRSA at the rate of 100% (50/50), whereas a rate of 74% (37/50) was granted to MRSA using oxacillin disk diffusion test. The highest percentage of MDR-MRSA was observed in class three of antibiotics 12 (24%). The lowest percentage was observed in classes 8 and 9 of antibiotics 1 (2%). For MDR-MRSA, the MAR index ranged from 0,27 to 1,0. Penicillin disk diffusion (DD) and DDST (PI/PIT) tests showed a production rate of β-lactamase in the range of 94 and 80%, respectively. 85,1% (40/50) of penicillin-resistant strains were positive for DDST. Thus, the D-test among MRSA strains shows a rate of 38% (19/50) of cMLSB and no strain attributed to the iMLSB phenotype. This is an alarming rate, confirming the concern that is still being discussed within the medical teams of the national health sector as well as the Algerian antimicrobial resistance network, which requires prompt intervention to update a new strategy to fight antimicrobial resistance.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
贝查尔省(阿尔及利亚)UTI患者分离的金黄色葡萄球菌菌株的甲氧西林、β-内酰胺和克林霉素耐药性谱
金黄色葡萄球菌是导致许多疾病的细菌病原体。金黄色葡萄球菌的多药耐药性已在全球范围内普遍存在,是治疗和护理金黄色葡萄菌感染患者的一个严重临床问题。对从贝查尔省(阿尔及利亚)尿路感染患者中分离的金黄色葡萄球菌尿路致病菌株进行表型鉴定,并评估其对推荐抗菌药物的多重耐药性(MDR)模式。通过选择性培养基,对211份尿液样本进行分析,分离出尿路致病金黄色葡萄球菌菌株,并进行各种生化鉴定试验。使用表型测试对金黄色葡萄球菌尿路致病菌株的多药耐药模式(MRSA、MLSB和β-内酰胺酶产生)进行了研究。共分离出50株金黄色葡萄球菌,占126株分离出的所有泌尿系病原体的40,48%。超过69%的女性有尿路感染,即性别比(SR)为0.43。药敏试验结果表明,分离的金黄色葡萄球菌对β-内酰胺类抗生素(青霉素、头孢西丁和苯唑西林)具有耐药性,对庆大霉素、氯霉素、复方三唑、万古霉素、氧氟沙星和环丙沙星敏感。头孢西丁纸片扩散和琼脂筛选试验表明,所有分离的金黄色葡萄球菌菌株均以100%(50/50)的比率被鉴定为MRSA,而使用苯唑西林纸片扩散试验,MRSA的合格率为74%(37/50)。耐多药耐药性MRSA的最高百分比出现在第三类抗生素12(24%)中。在抗生素1的8类和9类中观察到的百分比最低(2%)。耐多药耐药MRSA的MAR指数在0.27至1.0之间。青霉素盘扩散(DD)和DDST(PI/PIT)试验显示β-内酰胺酶的产生率分别在94%和80%之间。85,1%(40/50)的青霉素耐药菌株DDST阳性。因此,MRSA菌株之间的D测试显示cMLSB的比率为38%(19/50),并且没有菌株归因于iMLSB表型。这是一个惊人的速度,证实了国家卫生部门医疗团队以及阿尔及利亚抗微生物耐药性网络仍在讨论的担忧,该网络需要及时干预,以更新对抗抗微生物耐药性的新战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Anti-Infective Agents
Anti-Infective Agents Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmacology
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
期刊介绍: Anti-Infective Agents publishes original research articles, full-length/mini reviews, drug clinical trial studies and guest edited issues on all the latest and outstanding developments on the medicinal chemistry, biology, pharmacology and use of anti-infective and anti-parasitic agents. The scope of the journal covers all pre-clinical and clinical research on antimicrobials, antibacterials, antiviral, antifungal, and antiparasitic agents. Anti-Infective Agents is an essential journal for all infectious disease researchers in industry, academia and the health services.
期刊最新文献
Formulation and Evaluation of Polyherbal Antidandruff Shampoo Herbal Antibiotics: A Review of Traditional Medicinal Plants with Antibacterial Properties and Their Potential for Future Treatment In silico Screening of Plectranthus amboinicus and Hyptis suaveolens Phyto-chemicals: Novel Repellents Targeting Odorant Binding Proteins of Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus From Plants to Pills: Malaria Treatment Advancements in India Evaluation of the Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Properties of Hydrosol Extract and Essential Oil Derived from the Aerial Parts of Salvia argentea
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1