Assessing Quality Goal Rankings as a Method for Communicating Operator Intent

IF 2.2 Q3 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making Pub Date : 2022-10-11 DOI:10.1177/15553434221131665
Michael F. Schneider, Michael E. Miller, J. McGuirl
{"title":"Assessing Quality Goal Rankings as a Method for Communicating Operator Intent","authors":"Michael F. Schneider, Michael E. Miller, J. McGuirl","doi":"10.1177/15553434221131665","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Effective teammates coordinate their actions to achieve shared goals. In current human-Artificial Intelligent Agent (AIA) Teams, humans explicitly communicate task-oriented goals and how the goals are to be achieved to the AIAs as the AIAs do not support implicit communication. This research develops a construct for applying quality goals to improve coordination among human-AIA teams. This construct assumes that trained operators will exhibit similar priorities in similar situations and provides a shorthand communication mechanism to convey intentions. A study was designed and performed to assess situated operator priorities to provide insight into “how” operators desire a task to be performed. This assessment was performed episodically by trained and experienced Remotely Piloted Aircraft operators as they controlled an aircraft in a synthetic task environment through three challenging tactical scenarios. The results indicate that operator priorities change dynamically with situation changes. Further, the results are suitably cohesive across most trained operators to apply the data collected from the proposed method as training data to bootstrap development of an intent estimation agent. However, the data differed sufficiently among individual operators to justify the development of operator specific models, necessary for robust estimation of operator priorities to indicate “how” task-oriented goals should be pursued.","PeriodicalId":46342,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15553434221131665","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Effective teammates coordinate their actions to achieve shared goals. In current human-Artificial Intelligent Agent (AIA) Teams, humans explicitly communicate task-oriented goals and how the goals are to be achieved to the AIAs as the AIAs do not support implicit communication. This research develops a construct for applying quality goals to improve coordination among human-AIA teams. This construct assumes that trained operators will exhibit similar priorities in similar situations and provides a shorthand communication mechanism to convey intentions. A study was designed and performed to assess situated operator priorities to provide insight into “how” operators desire a task to be performed. This assessment was performed episodically by trained and experienced Remotely Piloted Aircraft operators as they controlled an aircraft in a synthetic task environment through three challenging tactical scenarios. The results indicate that operator priorities change dynamically with situation changes. Further, the results are suitably cohesive across most trained operators to apply the data collected from the proposed method as training data to bootstrap development of an intent estimation agent. However, the data differed sufficiently among individual operators to justify the development of operator specific models, necessary for robust estimation of operator priorities to indicate “how” task-oriented goals should be pursued.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评价质量目标排名作为传达操作员意图的一种方法
高效的队友协调行动,实现共同目标。在当前的人工智能代理(AIA)团队中,由于AIA不支持隐式通信,因此人类会向AIA明确传达面向任务的目标以及如何实现这些目标。这项研究开发了一个应用质量目标来改善人类AIA团队之间协调的结构。这种结构假设受过训练的操作员在类似的情况下会表现出类似的优先级,并提供了一种简短的沟通机制来传达意图。设计并执行了一项研究,以评估所处位置的操作员优先级,从而深入了解操作员希望执行任务的“方式”。这项评估是由训练有素、经验丰富的遥控飞机操作员在合成任务环境中通过三种具有挑战性的战术场景控制飞机时偶尔进行的。结果表明,操作员的优先级随着情况的变化而动态变化。此外,结果在大多数经过训练的操作员之间具有适当的内聚性,以将从所提出的方法收集的数据作为训练数据应用于意图估计代理的自举开发。然而,各个运营商之间的数据差异很大,足以证明开发特定运营商模型的合理性,这是对运营商优先级进行稳健估计所必需的,以表明“如何”实现面向任务的目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
21
期刊最新文献
Introduction to the Special Issue on Automation Failure Augmenting Human Cognition With a Digital Submarine Periscope Get on the Round Dial: Fighter Pilot Strategies for Recovering Situation Awareness After Disorienting Physiological Events Distinguishing Urgent From Non-urgent Communications: A Mixed Methods Study of Communication Technology Use in Perinatal Care Wrong, Strong, and Silent: What Happens when Automated Systems With High Autonomy and High Authority Misbehave?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1