DETERMINATION OF TAX OBJECT ACQUISITION VALUE (NPOP) BY THE REGIONAL REVENUE AGENCY IN THE IMPOSITION OF TAX ON ACQUISITION OF LAND AND BUILDING RIGHTS (BPHTB) FOR SALE AND PURCHASE (STUDY IN MALANG CITY)

Aulia Faza Regista, Muktiono, Supriyadi
{"title":"DETERMINATION OF TAX OBJECT ACQUISITION VALUE (NPOP) BY THE REGIONAL REVENUE AGENCY IN THE IMPOSITION OF TAX ON ACQUISITION OF LAND AND BUILDING RIGHTS (BPHTB) FOR SALE AND PURCHASE (STUDY IN MALANG CITY)","authors":"Aulia Faza Regista, Muktiono, Supriyadi","doi":"10.31435/rsglobal_ijitss/30062023/8009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study is to analyze and describe the basis used by Bapenda to deviate from the provisions of Article 6, paragraph (2), letter a of Law Number 20 of 2000 concerning BPHTB, in conjunction with the provisions of Article 7, paragraph (2), letter a, in conjunction with Article 10 of Malang City Regional Regulation Number 15 of 2010 concerning BPHTB, in collecting BPHTB in Malang City. It also aims to analyze and describe the indicators used by Bapenda to determine the fair transaction price in the sale and purchase of land in Malang City for the collection of BPHTB. This research is a socio-legal study with a juridical-sociological approach. The research was conducted at the Regional Revenue Agency of Malang City. The analysis results show that the Fees for Acquisition of Rights on Land and Building (BPHTB), as a local tax, are collected by the local government. BPHTB is calculated using the tariff and tax base, after being reduced by NPOPTKP. There is a difference in terminology between NPOP in the BPHTB Law and NJOP in the BPHTB Perda of Malang City. The collection of BPHTB must adhere to the principles of justice, legal certainty, legality, and simplicity. However, there were irregularities in the collection of BPHTB by Bapenda in Malang City in 2022 and 2023, as they violated the provisions by using the tax database and determining the increase in NJOP without a clear basis, undermining the principle of legality and causing conflicts with the BPHTB Law.","PeriodicalId":34770,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Innovative Technologies in Social Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Innovative Technologies in Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31435/rsglobal_ijitss/30062023/8009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze and describe the basis used by Bapenda to deviate from the provisions of Article 6, paragraph (2), letter a of Law Number 20 of 2000 concerning BPHTB, in conjunction with the provisions of Article 7, paragraph (2), letter a, in conjunction with Article 10 of Malang City Regional Regulation Number 15 of 2010 concerning BPHTB, in collecting BPHTB in Malang City. It also aims to analyze and describe the indicators used by Bapenda to determine the fair transaction price in the sale and purchase of land in Malang City for the collection of BPHTB. This research is a socio-legal study with a juridical-sociological approach. The research was conducted at the Regional Revenue Agency of Malang City. The analysis results show that the Fees for Acquisition of Rights on Land and Building (BPHTB), as a local tax, are collected by the local government. BPHTB is calculated using the tariff and tax base, after being reduced by NPOPTKP. There is a difference in terminology between NPOP in the BPHTB Law and NJOP in the BPHTB Perda of Malang City. The collection of BPHTB must adhere to the principles of justice, legal certainty, legality, and simplicity. However, there were irregularities in the collection of BPHTB by Bapenda in Malang City in 2022 and 2023, as they violated the provisions by using the tax database and determining the increase in NJOP without a clear basis, undermining the principle of legality and causing conflicts with the BPHTB Law.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
区域税收机构在征收土地和建筑权利(bphtb)买卖税时确定税收对象取得价值(npop)(在玛琅市的研究)
本研究的目的是分析和描述巴彭达偏离2000年第20号法律第6条第(2)款a信函中关于BPHTB的规定的依据,以及第7条第(1)款a信件的规定,以及2010年第15号马朗市区域法规第10条中关于BPHTB的规定,在马朗市收集BPHTB。它还旨在分析和描述巴彭达用于确定马朗市土地买卖的公平交易价格的指标,以收集BPHTB。本研究是一项采用司法社会学方法的社会法律研究。这项研究是在马朗市地方税务局进行的。分析结果表明,土地和建筑权利取得费作为地方税,由地方政府征收。BPHTB是在NPOPTKP降低后使用关税和税基计算的。BPHTB法中的NPOP和马朗市BPHTB Perda中的NJOP在术语上存在差异。BPHTB的收集必须遵守公正、法律确定性、合法性和简单性的原则。然而,2022年和2023年,巴彭达在马朗市征收BPHTB时存在违规行为,因为他们在没有明确依据的情况下使用税务数据库并确定NJOP的增长,违反了规定,破坏了合法性原则,并与《BPHTB法》发生冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
THE PROBLEM OF CLASSIFICATION OF HISTORICAL MONUMENTS IN ALGERIA: THE CASE OF THE AGHA PALACE IN FERDJIOUA BIM: A COLLABORATIVE APPROACH TO ARCHITECTURAL PROJECT MANAGEMENT THE USE OF DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY IN UNIVERSITY LEARNING THROUGH A BIBLIOMETRIC APPROACH FEATURES AND PROBLEMS OF PROFESSIONAL VOCAL EDUCATION AND REFORM EXPLORATION IN MODERN CHINA THE SOCIAL DIMENSION OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT: EMPLOYMENT, UNEMPLOYMENT AND POVERTY AS SUSTAINABILITY MEASUREMENT INDICATORS IN ALGERIA. CASE OF THE CITY OF SKIKDA
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1