Escala para medir la significación del pensamiento complejo en entornos virtuales de aprendizaje de instituciones de educación superior

IF 0.1 Q4 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Revista Ra Ximhai Pub Date : 2022-02-28 DOI:10.35197/rx.18.01.2022.09.va
Víctor del Carmen Avendaño-Porras, Claudia Inés Bohórquez-Olaya, Paola Andrea Lara-Buitagro
{"title":"Escala para medir la significación del pensamiento complejo en entornos virtuales de aprendizaje de instituciones de educación superior","authors":"Víctor del Carmen Avendaño-Porras, Claudia Inés Bohórquez-Olaya, Paola Andrea Lara-Buitagro","doi":"10.35197/rx.18.01.2022.09.va","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The concept of complex thought in Higher Education Institutions has been little addressed and understood, since it is still in the intellectual imagination of educational actors that it is a theoretical construct with which problems of formal sciences can be solved, more not of the factual ones; If we add to this that during the Covid-19 pandemic Virtual Learning Environments had to be used with much greater intensity, the challenge of perceiving the concept and merging it with ICTs for the construction of meta-complex virtual environments turns out to be a challenge. The main objective of this document was to develop an instrument to measure the significance of complex thinking in Virtual Learning Environments in Higher Education Institutions; For this purpose, the instrumental methodology of Hernández (2011) was used, applying the validation of experts, using the focus group method, where a value of .77 was obtained, which is considered a good degree of validity. Reliability was also analyzed using Cronbach's Alpha, which showed a value of .780, which is why it is considered adequate. The questionnaire is made up of 63 items, 57 of which are integrated using a 4-level Likert scale; Therefore, it is considered to be a valid and reliable instrument. The instrument proposes to know precisely the relationship that exists between the concept of complex thought and virtuality and how these are merged by educational actors.","PeriodicalId":44156,"journal":{"name":"Revista Ra Ximhai","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Ra Ximhai","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35197/rx.18.01.2022.09.va","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The concept of complex thought in Higher Education Institutions has been little addressed and understood, since it is still in the intellectual imagination of educational actors that it is a theoretical construct with which problems of formal sciences can be solved, more not of the factual ones; If we add to this that during the Covid-19 pandemic Virtual Learning Environments had to be used with much greater intensity, the challenge of perceiving the concept and merging it with ICTs for the construction of meta-complex virtual environments turns out to be a challenge. The main objective of this document was to develop an instrument to measure the significance of complex thinking in Virtual Learning Environments in Higher Education Institutions; For this purpose, the instrumental methodology of Hernández (2011) was used, applying the validation of experts, using the focus group method, where a value of .77 was obtained, which is considered a good degree of validity. Reliability was also analyzed using Cronbach's Alpha, which showed a value of .780, which is why it is considered adequate. The questionnaire is made up of 63 items, 57 of which are integrated using a 4-level Likert scale; Therefore, it is considered to be a valid and reliable instrument. The instrument proposes to know precisely the relationship that exists between the concept of complex thought and virtuality and how these are merged by educational actors.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
衡量高等教育机构虚拟学习环境中复杂思维意义的量表
高等教育机构中复杂思想的概念很少被提及和理解,因为它仍然存在于教育行动者的智力想象中,它是一个理论结构,可以解决形式科学的问题,更不是事实问题;如果我们再加上,在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,虚拟学习环境必须以更大的强度使用,那么感知概念并将其与信息通信技术相结合以构建元复杂虚拟环境的挑战将成为一项挑战。该文件的主要目标是开发一种工具来衡量高等教育机构虚拟学习环境中复杂思维的重要性;为此,使用Hernández(2011)的工具方法,应用专家验证,使用焦点小组方法,其中获得的值为0.77,被认为是良好的效度。可靠性也使用Cronbach's Alpha进行分析,结果显示值为0.780,这就是为什么它被认为是足够的。问卷共63个条目,其中57个条目采用4级李克特量表进行整合;因此,它被认为是一种有效和可靠的工具。该工具旨在准确地了解复杂思想和虚拟概念之间存在的关系,以及教育行为者如何将它们融合在一起。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Revista Ra Ximhai
Revista Ra Ximhai SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Elementos esenciales de la cultura organizacional para la formulación de la estrategia competitiva; dos estudios de caso de empresas hoteleras de Mazatlán, Sinaloa Migración interna en México. Un análisis al estudio regional en Los Cabos, B.C.S. (2021) Causas de bajas escolares de estudiantes de educación superior durante la pandemia COVID-19 Guía para la revisión y el análisis documental: propuesta desde el enfoque investigativo Análisis de la contribución económica de la producción de berries en la región altos sur del estado de Jalisco, México
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1