Identifying Barriers to Accessibility for Museum Visitors Who Are Blind and Visually Impaired

IF 1.6 Q3 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM Visitor Studies Pub Date : 2023-02-03 DOI:10.1080/10645578.2023.2168421
Jennifer Fortuna, Claire Harrison, Abigail Eekhoff, Candice Marthaler, Megan Seromik, Stephanie Ogren, Julia VanderMolen
{"title":"Identifying Barriers to Accessibility for Museum Visitors Who Are Blind and Visually Impaired","authors":"Jennifer Fortuna, Claire Harrison, Abigail Eekhoff, Candice Marthaler, Megan Seromik, Stephanie Ogren, Julia VanderMolen","doi":"10.1080/10645578.2023.2168421","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract For people with visual impairment, environmental features create barriers to inclusion and participation in public places such as museums. This study gathered direct feedback on accessibility from people with visual impairment to inform a major renovation at the Grand Rapids Public Museum. This study used a participatory action research design. Data collection included a guided walk and semi-structured interviews. A descriptive numerical summary and qualitative thematic analysis were used to summarize the results. Twelve participants were assigned to three categories of visual impairment: low vision, legally blind, and totally blind. The primary barriers to accessibility included inaccessible signage, lack of multi-sensory information, and staff training. Suggestions for improving accessibility include adding assistive technology and increased staff involvement. Identifying barriers to accessibility requires involving people with visual impairment in the decision making process. Understanding the unique needs of people with visual impairment will promote inclusion and participation in museum settings.","PeriodicalId":45516,"journal":{"name":"Visitor Studies","volume":"26 1","pages":"103 - 124"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Visitor Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10645578.2023.2168421","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract For people with visual impairment, environmental features create barriers to inclusion and participation in public places such as museums. This study gathered direct feedback on accessibility from people with visual impairment to inform a major renovation at the Grand Rapids Public Museum. This study used a participatory action research design. Data collection included a guided walk and semi-structured interviews. A descriptive numerical summary and qualitative thematic analysis were used to summarize the results. Twelve participants were assigned to three categories of visual impairment: low vision, legally blind, and totally blind. The primary barriers to accessibility included inaccessible signage, lack of multi-sensory information, and staff training. Suggestions for improving accessibility include adding assistive technology and increased staff involvement. Identifying barriers to accessibility requires involving people with visual impairment in the decision making process. Understanding the unique needs of people with visual impairment will promote inclusion and participation in museum settings.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
识别盲人和视障博物馆游客的无障碍通道
对于视障人士来说,在博物馆等公共场所,环境特征给他们的融入和参与带来了障碍。这项研究收集了视觉障碍人士对无障碍环境的直接反馈,为大急流城公共博物馆的重大翻新提供了信息。本研究采用参与式行动研究设计。数据收集包括引导步行和半结构化访谈。使用描述性数值总结和定性专题分析来总结结果。12名参与者被分为三类视力障碍:低视力、法定失明和完全失明。无障碍的主要障碍包括难以使用的标志、缺乏多感官信息和工作人员培训。改善无障碍的建议包括增加辅助技术和增加工作人员的参与。确定无障碍障碍需要让视障人士参与决策过程。了解视障人士的独特需求将促进博物馆环境的包容和参与。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Visitor Studies
Visitor Studies HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
13.30%
发文量
9
期刊最新文献
Designing for Embodied Proximity. Ex Post Facto Evaluation of Participant Recruitment Techniques in a Zoological Setting Outside Museum Walls: The Impact of Community Facilitators in an Outdoor Social Science Exhibition Adapting Visual Thinking Strategies as a Tool for Evaluating the Impact of a Work of Public Art Faces and Voices of Real People: Connecting and Learning in a History Museum Exhibit
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1