FLEGT Voluntary Partnership Agreement Implementation in Ghana: Insights from a SWOT Analysis

IF 1.5 4区 农林科学 Q2 FORESTRY International Forestry Review Pub Date : 2022-01-19 DOI:10.1505/146554821834777206
M. A. Adams, Y. Tegegne, S. Ramcilovik-Suominen, E. Acheampong, A. Attah
{"title":"FLEGT Voluntary Partnership Agreement Implementation in Ghana: Insights from a SWOT Analysis","authors":"M. A. Adams, Y. Tegegne, S. Ramcilovik-Suominen, E. Acheampong, A. Attah","doi":"10.1505/146554821834777206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"HIGHLIGHTS This paper analyses the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats of the Ghana VPA process. The identified weaknesses undermine the strengths. The multi-stakeholder platform is seen as a top-down process. The VPA has influenced legal reforms and brought some legal clarity, yet implementing the reforms remains a challenge. Implementing agencies need to address the unequal power relations between domestic actors if forest governance issues are to be addressed. SUMMARY The European Union Forest Law Enforcement, Governance and Trade (FLEGT) Voluntary Partnership Agreements (VPA) is an important international forest governance initiative, yet various implementation challenges remain. The FLEGT VPA implementation challenges are well-documented in the scientific literature, where various methodologies and research approaches have been used. As the empirical case indicated various contradicting and overlapping claims, where different respondents framed the same situations as strengths as well as weaknesses, and/or as threats as well as opportunities, we used the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats (SWOT) approach to assess the associated governance changes in FLEGT VPA implementation in Ghana. This paper offers new insights derived from participant observation of the second independent technical evaluation of the Ghana Timber Legality Assurance System (GhTLAS) conducted in July 2019, and from semi-structured interviews with key informants and a document review. What are considered the greatest perceived strengths – namely multi-stakeholder engagement, clarification of regulatory frameworks, and access to information – are brought into question once the identified weaknesses and threats are explored in more detail. The identified weaknesses include the top-down nature of the multi-stakeholder process, fatigue related to additional legality principles, and bureaucracy of the GhTLAS, which negatively affect VPA implementation activities and processes in Ghana.","PeriodicalId":13868,"journal":{"name":"International Forestry Review","volume":"23 1","pages":"405 - 417"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Forestry Review","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1505/146554821834777206","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

HIGHLIGHTS This paper analyses the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats of the Ghana VPA process. The identified weaknesses undermine the strengths. The multi-stakeholder platform is seen as a top-down process. The VPA has influenced legal reforms and brought some legal clarity, yet implementing the reforms remains a challenge. Implementing agencies need to address the unequal power relations between domestic actors if forest governance issues are to be addressed. SUMMARY The European Union Forest Law Enforcement, Governance and Trade (FLEGT) Voluntary Partnership Agreements (VPA) is an important international forest governance initiative, yet various implementation challenges remain. The FLEGT VPA implementation challenges are well-documented in the scientific literature, where various methodologies and research approaches have been used. As the empirical case indicated various contradicting and overlapping claims, where different respondents framed the same situations as strengths as well as weaknesses, and/or as threats as well as opportunities, we used the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats (SWOT) approach to assess the associated governance changes in FLEGT VPA implementation in Ghana. This paper offers new insights derived from participant observation of the second independent technical evaluation of the Ghana Timber Legality Assurance System (GhTLAS) conducted in July 2019, and from semi-structured interviews with key informants and a document review. What are considered the greatest perceived strengths – namely multi-stakeholder engagement, clarification of regulatory frameworks, and access to information – are brought into question once the identified weaknesses and threats are explored in more detail. The identified weaknesses include the top-down nature of the multi-stakeholder process, fatigue related to additional legality principles, and bureaucracy of the GhTLAS, which negatively affect VPA implementation activities and processes in Ghana.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加纳FLEGT自愿伙伴协议实施:SWOT分析的启示
本文分析了加纳VPA进程的优势、劣势、机会和威胁。识别出的弱点会削弱优势。多方利益相关者平台被视为一个自上而下的过程。VPA影响了法律改革,并带来了一些法律清晰度,但实施改革仍然是一个挑战。如果要解决森林治理问题,执行机构需要解决国内行动者之间不平等的权力关系。欧盟森林执法、治理和贸易(FLEGT)自愿伙伴协议(VPA)是一项重要的国际森林治理倡议,但实施方面仍存在各种挑战。科学文献充分记录了FLEGT VPA实施的挑战,其中使用了各种方法和研究方法。由于经验案例表明了各种相互矛盾和重叠的主张,其中不同的受访者将相同的情况视为优势和劣势,和/或威胁和机会,我们使用优势,劣势,机会和威胁(SWOT)方法来评估加纳FLEGT VPA实施中的相关治理变化。本文通过对2019年7月对加纳木材合法性保证体系(GhTLAS)进行的第二次独立技术评估的参与者观察,以及对关键线人的半结构化访谈和文件审查,提供了新的见解。一旦更详细地探讨了已确定的弱点和威胁,就会对被认为是最大的感知优势——即多方利益相关者的参与、监管框架的澄清和信息的获取——提出质疑。已确定的弱点包括多利益攸关方过程自上而下的性质、与附加合法性原则有关的疲劳以及GhTLAS的官僚主义,这些都对加纳的自愿行动方案实施活动和过程产生了负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Forestry Review
International Forestry Review 农林科学-林学
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
6.20%
发文量
29
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Forestry Review is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal that publishes original research and review papers on forest policy and science, with an emphasis on issues of transnational significance. It is published four times per year, in March, June, September and December. Special Issues are a regular feature and attract a wide audience. Click here for subscription details.
期刊最新文献
Development cooperation, non-timber forest products and community empowerment: power and interests in a public-private partnership in the Brazilian Amazon Passion for nature: global student motivations for forestrelated education and career aspirations The experience of Forest Landscape Restoration in Madhya Pradesh, India Mangrove biomass and carbon estimates for REDD+ from national forest inventory in two regions of Myanmar Lessons from insect and disease impacts on radiata pine (Pinus radiata D. Don) plantations in New Zealand over the last hundred years
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1