Does Mode of Input Affect How Second Language Learners Create Form–Meaning Connections and Pronounce Second Language Words?

IF 4.7 1区 文学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Modern Language Journal Pub Date : 2022-05-31 DOI:10.1111/modl.12775
Takumi Uchihara, S. Webb, Kazuya Saito, P. Trofimovich
{"title":"Does Mode of Input Affect How Second Language Learners Create Form–Meaning Connections and Pronounce Second Language Words?","authors":"Takumi Uchihara, S. Webb, Kazuya Saito, P. Trofimovich","doi":"10.1111/modl.12775","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examined how mode of input affects the learning of pronunciation and form–meaning connection of second language (L2) words. Seventy-five Japanese learners of English were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 conditions (reading while listening, reading only, listening only), studied 40 low- frequency words while viewing their corresponding pictures, and completed a picture-naming test 3 times (before, immediately, and about 6 days after treatment). The elicited speech samples were as- sessed for form–meaning connection (spoken form recall) and pronunciation accuracy (accentedness, comprehensibility). Results showed that the reading-while-listening group recalled a significantly greater number of spoken word forms than did the listening-only group. Learners in the reading-while-listening and listening-only modes were judged to be less accented and more comprehensible compared to learn- ers in the reading-only mode. However, only learners receiving spoken input without orthographic support retained more target-like (less accented) pronunciation compared to learners receiving only written input. Furthermore, sound–spelling consistency of words significantly moderated the degree to which different learning modes impacted pronunciation learning. Taken together, the findings suggest that si- multaneous presentation of written and spoken forms is optimal for the development of form–meaning connection and comprehensibility of novel words but that provision of only spoken input may be bene- ficial for the attainment of target-like accent.","PeriodicalId":48249,"journal":{"name":"Modern Language Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Modern Language Journal","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12775","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This study examined how mode of input affects the learning of pronunciation and form–meaning connection of second language (L2) words. Seventy-five Japanese learners of English were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 conditions (reading while listening, reading only, listening only), studied 40 low- frequency words while viewing their corresponding pictures, and completed a picture-naming test 3 times (before, immediately, and about 6 days after treatment). The elicited speech samples were as- sessed for form–meaning connection (spoken form recall) and pronunciation accuracy (accentedness, comprehensibility). Results showed that the reading-while-listening group recalled a significantly greater number of spoken word forms than did the listening-only group. Learners in the reading-while-listening and listening-only modes were judged to be less accented and more comprehensible compared to learn- ers in the reading-only mode. However, only learners receiving spoken input without orthographic support retained more target-like (less accented) pronunciation compared to learners receiving only written input. Furthermore, sound–spelling consistency of words significantly moderated the degree to which different learning modes impacted pronunciation learning. Taken together, the findings suggest that si- multaneous presentation of written and spoken forms is optimal for the development of form–meaning connection and comprehensibility of novel words but that provision of only spoken input may be bene- ficial for the attainment of target-like accent.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
输入方式是否影响二语学习者形成形式-意义联系和二语单词发音?
本研究考察了输入方式如何影响第二语言(L2)单词的发音和形义联系学习。75名日本英语学习者被随机分配到3种条件(边听边读、只读、只听)中的一种,在看图片的同时学习40个低频单词,并完成3次(治疗前、治疗后、治疗后约6天)的图片命名测试。对提取的语音样本进行形式-意义联系(口语形式回忆)和发音准确性(重音性、可理解性)评估。结果显示,边听边读组比只听组能记住更多的口语单词形式。与纯阅读模式下的学习者相比,边听边读和纯听模式下的学习者口音更轻,更易理解。然而,与只接受书面输入的学习者相比,只有接受没有正字法支持的口语输入的学习者保留了更多的目标发音(更少的重音)。此外,单词的发音拼写一致性显著调节了不同学习模式对发音学习的影响程度。综上所述,研究结果表明,书面和口头形式的同时呈现对形式-意义联系的发展和新单词的可理解性是最佳的,但只提供口头输入可能有利于实现目标口音。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
4.10%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: A refereed publication, The Modern Language Journal is dedicated to promoting scholarly exchange among teachers and researchers of all modern foreign languages and English as a second language. This journal publishes documented essays, quantitative and qualitative research studies, response articles, and editorials that challenge paradigms of language learning and teaching. The Modern Language Journal offers a professional calendar of events and news, a listing of relevant articles in other journals, an annual survey of doctoral degrees in all areas concerning foreign and second languages, and reviews of scholarly books, textbooks, videotapes, and software.
期刊最新文献
Pero yo también estoy aprendiendo”: Negotiating expert and novice positions in heritage–second language learner interaction Between teacher candidates’ reflection and teacher educators’ evaluation: Fluctuations in epistemic (a)symmetry in feedback conversations L2 grammar‐for‐interaction: Functions of “and”‐prefaced turns in L2 students’ collaborative talk Developing advanced L2 German writing: A functionally oriented longitudinal study Task communicative function and oral fluency of L1 and L2 speakers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1