An Analysis of Water Sorption of Some Composites Used in Dentistry

IF 0.6 4区 材料科学 Q4 MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Materiale Plastice Pub Date : 2023-07-03 DOI:10.37358/mp.23.2.5663
Özlem Akyüz Bege�, Hakan Bege�
{"title":"An Analysis of Water Sorption of Some Composites Used in Dentistry","authors":"Özlem Akyüz Bege�, Hakan Bege�","doi":"10.37358/mp.23.2.5663","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThis study aimed to investigate the water sorption levels of 3 different condensable bulk fill composites, two flowable bulk fill composites, two microhybrid composites, one nanofilled composite, and one nanohybrid composite material polymerized with the same beam device on the 14th and 30th days.We evaluated nine different composite materials. The materials were prepared as cylindrical blocks (n=7) with a diameter of 7 mm and a thickness of 2 mm and polymerized. Each sample was kept in distilled water for specified times and measured by the ISO 4049 method.We used The Kruskal-Wallis test to compare more than two independent groups where numerical variables had no normal distribution. The Dwass-Steel-Critchlow-Fligner test evaluated differences between the groups if the non-parametric tests were applied. We used The Wilcoxon test to compare the numerical variables without normal distribution (water sorption values in the 14th and 30th-day measurements for each cement material).For water sorption, there was no statistically significant difference between the water sorption values of the resin composite materials on the 14th and 30th days. No statistically significant difference was found in comparing water sorption values between the 14th and 30th measurements for each resin composite material. There is a need for more extended studies by keeping the conditions constant for the evaluated composites and for bulk fill composites to be evaluated with 4mm samples.\n","PeriodicalId":18360,"journal":{"name":"Materiale Plastice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Materiale Plastice","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37358/mp.23.2.5663","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the water sorption levels of 3 different condensable bulk fill composites, two flowable bulk fill composites, two microhybrid composites, one nanofilled composite, and one nanohybrid composite material polymerized with the same beam device on the 14th and 30th days.We evaluated nine different composite materials. The materials were prepared as cylindrical blocks (n=7) with a diameter of 7 mm and a thickness of 2 mm and polymerized. Each sample was kept in distilled water for specified times and measured by the ISO 4049 method.We used The Kruskal-Wallis test to compare more than two independent groups where numerical variables had no normal distribution. The Dwass-Steel-Critchlow-Fligner test evaluated differences between the groups if the non-parametric tests were applied. We used The Wilcoxon test to compare the numerical variables without normal distribution (water sorption values in the 14th and 30th-day measurements for each cement material).For water sorption, there was no statistically significant difference between the water sorption values of the resin composite materials on the 14th and 30th days. No statistically significant difference was found in comparing water sorption values between the 14th and 30th measurements for each resin composite material. There is a need for more extended studies by keeping the conditions constant for the evaluated composites and for bulk fill composites to be evaluated with 4mm samples.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
几种牙科用复合材料的吸水性分析
本研究旨在研究在第14天和第30天用相同的束装置聚合的3种不同的可冷凝体填充复合材料、两种可流动体填充复合物、两种微杂化复合材料、一种纳米填充复合材料和一种纳米杂化复合材料的吸水水平。我们评估了九种不同的复合材料。将材料制备为直径为7mm、厚度为2mm的圆柱形块体(n=7)并聚合。每个样品在蒸馏水中保存指定时间,并通过ISO 4049方法进行测量。我们使用Kruskal-Wallis检验来比较两个以上数值变量没有正态分布的独立组。如果采用非参数检验,则Dwass Steel Critchlow Fligner检验评估了各组之间的差异。我们使用Wilcoxon检验来比较没有正态分布的数值变量(每种水泥材料在第14天和第30天测量的吸水值)。对于吸水性,树脂复合材料在第十四天和第三十天的吸水值之间没有统计学上的显著差异。在比较每种树脂复合材料的第14次和第30次测量之间的吸水值时,没有发现统计学上的显著差异。需要通过保持评估的复合材料和用4mm样品评估的散装填充复合材料的条件不变来进行更广泛的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Materiale Plastice
Materiale Plastice MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
25.00%
发文量
99
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Materiale Plastice, abbreviated as Mater. Plast., publishes original scientific papers or guest reviews on topics of great interest. The Journal does not publish memos, technical reports or non-original papers (that are a compiling of literature data) or papers that have been already published in other national or foreign Journal.
期刊最新文献
Experimental Analysis of Hyperelastic Materials Using the Vibration Method Impact of Aligned Carbon Nanotubes on the Mechanical Properties and Sensing Performance of EVA/CNTs Composites Influence of Biphasic Calcium Phosphate Incorporation Into Alginate Matrices In vitro Comparison of the Efficiency of Celluloid and Metallic Matrices in Proximal Restorations with a Bulk Polymer-based Biomaterial The Influence of the Delamination Location on the Bending Behavior of E-Glass Fiber EWR Flat Plates
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1