Measuring Employees’ Communication for Innovation: The Employee Innovation Potential Scale

IF 2.2 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED Journal of Personnel Psychology Pub Date : 2022-08-10 DOI:10.1027/1866-5888/a000306
P. Vrgović, A. Walton, Darrel L. Sandall, Bojana M. Dinić
{"title":"Measuring Employees’ Communication for Innovation: The Employee Innovation Potential Scale","authors":"P. Vrgović, A. Walton, Darrel L. Sandall, Bojana M. Dinić","doi":"10.1027/1866-5888/a000306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. This research aimed to introduce and validate a new self-report measure of organizational communication related to early stages of employee-driven innovation – the Employee Innovation Potential Scale (EIPS). Exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis were performed consecutively on two samples of employees from Serbian companies ( N = 723). The final form of the EIPS comprises 25 items and measures four factors: insight into company problems and their causes, company values employees' ideas, idea communication, and interest in company improvements. Employees who shared more ideas had higher scores on all four factors compared to employees who did not share any ideas or just a few, which confirmed factors’ criterion validity. Moreover, employees who shared more global and radical ideas had higher scores on the first two factors. The results supported the four-factor solution of EIPS and its criterion validity.","PeriodicalId":46765,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Personnel Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Personnel Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1027/1866-5888/a000306","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract. This research aimed to introduce and validate a new self-report measure of organizational communication related to early stages of employee-driven innovation – the Employee Innovation Potential Scale (EIPS). Exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis were performed consecutively on two samples of employees from Serbian companies ( N = 723). The final form of the EIPS comprises 25 items and measures four factors: insight into company problems and their causes, company values employees' ideas, idea communication, and interest in company improvements. Employees who shared more ideas had higher scores on all four factors compared to employees who did not share any ideas or just a few, which confirmed factors’ criterion validity. Moreover, employees who shared more global and radical ideas had higher scores on the first two factors. The results supported the four-factor solution of EIPS and its criterion validity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
衡量员工创新沟通:员工创新潜力量表
摘要本研究旨在引入并验证一种新的与员工驱动创新早期阶段相关的组织沟通自我报告测量方法——员工创新潜力量表(EIPS)。对塞尔维亚公司的两个员工样本(N=723)连续进行了探索性因素分析和验证性因素分析。EIPS的最终形式包括25个项目,衡量四个因素:对公司问题及其原因的洞察、公司对员工想法的重视、想法沟通以及对公司改进的兴趣。与没有分享任何想法或只有几个想法的员工相比,分享更多想法的员工在所有四个因素上的得分都更高,这证实了因素的标准有效性。此外,分享更全球化和激进想法的员工在前两个因素上的得分更高。结果支持EIPS的四因子解及其准则的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Personnel Psychology
Journal of Personnel Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊最新文献
Is Gamification a Suitable Means to Improve Applicant Reactions and Convey Information During an Online Test? The Effect of Interviewer Job Expertise and Risk-Related Traits on Opportunity to Fake Perceived Challenges When Changing Employer Resilience in Times of a Pandemic The Impact of Mobile Devices on Working Memory
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1