Do country sizes matter? What motivates China’s trade decision in Southern Africa?

E. Igbinoba
{"title":"Do country sizes matter? What motivates China’s trade decision in Southern Africa?","authors":"E. Igbinoba","doi":"10.1108/JCEFTS-07-2016-0018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose \n \n \n \n \nThis paper aims to test the political-economy hypothesis that country sizes are related with constraints associated with Chinese trade. \n \n \n \n \nDesign/methodology/approach \n \n \n \n \nThis study applies a generalized linear mixed approach on panel data of Southern African (henceforth SADC) economies from 2001 to 2014 to observe common Chinese trade patterns among SADC countries. \n \n \n \n \nFindings \n \n \n \n \nEmpirical results support the hypothesis that structural differences exist and smaller SADC countries are disadvantaged in their trade relations with China. \n \n \n \n \nResearch limitations/implications \n \n \n \n \nThis paper is exploratory by nature. Its scope and the depth of analysis is constrained by data availability. \n \n \n \n \nOriginality/value \n \n \n \n \nThe manuscript has been approved by the author and has never been published, or has been considered for publication elsewhere.","PeriodicalId":44245,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chinese Economic and Foreign Trade Studies","volume":"10 1","pages":"44-60"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/JCEFTS-07-2016-0018","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chinese Economic and Foreign Trade Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/JCEFTS-07-2016-0018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to test the political-economy hypothesis that country sizes are related with constraints associated with Chinese trade. Design/methodology/approach This study applies a generalized linear mixed approach on panel data of Southern African (henceforth SADC) economies from 2001 to 2014 to observe common Chinese trade patterns among SADC countries. Findings Empirical results support the hypothesis that structural differences exist and smaller SADC countries are disadvantaged in their trade relations with China. Research limitations/implications This paper is exploratory by nature. Its scope and the depth of analysis is constrained by data availability. Originality/value The manuscript has been approved by the author and has never been published, or has been considered for publication elsewhere.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
国家规模重要吗?是什么推动了中国在南部非洲的贸易决策?
本文旨在检验国家规模与中国贸易约束相关的政治经济学假设。设计/方法/方法本研究采用广义线性混合方法对2001年至2014年南部非洲(以下简称SADC)经济体的面板数据进行分析,观察中国在SADC国家之间的共同贸易模式。实证结果支持结构性差异存在的假设,较小的南共体国家在与中国的贸易关系中处于不利地位。这篇论文是探索性的。其分析的范围和深度受到数据可用性的限制。原创性/价值原稿已被作者批准,从未发表过,或已考虑在其他地方发表。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.20%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: The Journal of Chinese Economic and Foreign Trade Studies (JCEFTS) negotiates China''s unique position within the international economy, and its interaction across the globe. From a truly international perspective, the journal publishes both qualitative and quantitative research in all areas of Chinese business and foreign trade, technical economics, business environment and business strategy. JCEFTS publishes high quality research papers, viewpoints, conceptual papers, case studies, literature reviews and general views. Emphasis is placed on the publication of articles which seek to link theory with application, or critically analyse real situations in terms of Chinese economics and business in China, with the objective of identifying good practice in these areas and assisting in the development of more appropriate arrangements for addressing crucial issues of Chinese economics and business. Papers accepted for publication will be double–blind peer-reviewed to ensure academic rigour and integrity.
期刊最新文献
Digital financial inclusion and inclusive development in lower-middle-income countries: the enabling role of institutional quality COVID-19 pandemic and linkage between stock markets in Middle Eastern countries Impact of factory certifications on firm resources: a quantitative content analysis of the Bangladeshi readymade garments (RMG) industry Corporate cash holding and firm’s performance in times of Ukraine war: a literature review and way forward Beyond the seams: evaluating competitiveness and comparative advantage in Vietnam’s apparel industry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1