Review: De Vries, M. S., Nemec, J., and Špaček, D. (2022) International Trends in Participatory Budgeting: Between Trivial Pursuits and Best Practices, Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2022, ISBN 978-3-030-79929-8.

Q2 Social Sciences Slovak Journal of Political Sciences Pub Date : 2021-12-31 DOI:10.34135/sjps.210207
Martina Balážová
{"title":"Review: De Vries, M. S., Nemec, J., and Špaček, D. (2022) International Trends in Participatory Budgeting: Between Trivial Pursuits and Best Practices, Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2022, ISBN 978-3-030-79929-8.","authors":"Martina Balážová","doi":"10.34135/sjps.210207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A decade ago, when many European countries were only commencing with participatory budgeting (PB), research literature remained fragmented and rather scarce. The book International Trends in Participatory Budgeting: Between Trivial Pursuits and Best Practices provides a unique report on the state of PB in Europe. In particular, it has a focus on Central Eastern European (CEE) cases in a comparative perspective. The book unveils to the reader the beginnings and first steps of PB implementation, and it opens a discussion on its development and durability. In the first chapter of the book, the authors emphasize the specific nature of the spread of PB. “When the innovative practice spread [...] something strange happened. The main intended effects and the unintended sideeffects of PB changed places. The main effects became secondary, and the unintended side-effects became major goals of PB” (p. 16). The book then in-depth details the practices and expected and unexpected results of PB implementation. The reader is invited to set out on a discovery through thirteen countries: Germany, Italy, Sweden, Belarus, Croatia, Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Romania, Russia, Serbia, Slovenia, and Slovakia. As acknowledged by the authors, these countries were still a “black box” (p. 21), where hardly anything was known regarding PB developments. The authors naturally identified some countries as “old democracies” (Germany, Italy, Sweden) and used them as benchmarks for analysing the PB in the CEE region. They opened this black box, with each chapter dedicated to one country. The book also provides reasons for implementing the PB in each country, information on the stage of its implementation, and concludes with a statement of outcomes, their acceptance, and overall satisfaction with PB among decisionmakers and other participants in its implementation and sustention. The editors of the book are well-known authors in terms of local government, public administration, and budgeting innovations in and outside the CEE region. Following the previously published book Performancebased Budgeting in the Public Sector (2019), the editors Michiel de Vries,","PeriodicalId":36889,"journal":{"name":"Slovak Journal of Political Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Slovak Journal of Political Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34135/sjps.210207","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A decade ago, when many European countries were only commencing with participatory budgeting (PB), research literature remained fragmented and rather scarce. The book International Trends in Participatory Budgeting: Between Trivial Pursuits and Best Practices provides a unique report on the state of PB in Europe. In particular, it has a focus on Central Eastern European (CEE) cases in a comparative perspective. The book unveils to the reader the beginnings and first steps of PB implementation, and it opens a discussion on its development and durability. In the first chapter of the book, the authors emphasize the specific nature of the spread of PB. “When the innovative practice spread [...] something strange happened. The main intended effects and the unintended sideeffects of PB changed places. The main effects became secondary, and the unintended side-effects became major goals of PB” (p. 16). The book then in-depth details the practices and expected and unexpected results of PB implementation. The reader is invited to set out on a discovery through thirteen countries: Germany, Italy, Sweden, Belarus, Croatia, Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Romania, Russia, Serbia, Slovenia, and Slovakia. As acknowledged by the authors, these countries were still a “black box” (p. 21), where hardly anything was known regarding PB developments. The authors naturally identified some countries as “old democracies” (Germany, Italy, Sweden) and used them as benchmarks for analysing the PB in the CEE region. They opened this black box, with each chapter dedicated to one country. The book also provides reasons for implementing the PB in each country, information on the stage of its implementation, and concludes with a statement of outcomes, their acceptance, and overall satisfaction with PB among decisionmakers and other participants in its implementation and sustention. The editors of the book are well-known authors in terms of local government, public administration, and budgeting innovations in and outside the CEE region. Following the previously published book Performancebased Budgeting in the Public Sector (2019), the editors Michiel de Vries,
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Review: De Vries, m.s, Nemec, J, and Špaček, D.(2022)参与式预算的国际趋势:琐碎追求与最佳实践之间,Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2022, ISBN 978-3-030-79929-8。
十年前,当许多欧洲国家刚刚开始实施参与式预算(PB)时,研究文献仍然支离破碎,相当稀少。《参与式预算的国际趋势:在琐碎的追求和最佳实践之间》一书提供了一份关于欧洲PB状况的独特报告。特别是,它从比较的角度关注中欧和东欧(CEE)的案例。本书向读者揭示了PB实施的开始和第一步,并对其发展和持久性进行了讨论。在书的第一章中,作者强调了PB传播的特殊性。“当创新实践传播开来……奇怪的事情发生了。PB的主要预期效果和意外副作用的位置发生了变化。主要效果变成了次要的,意想不到的副作用成为了PB的主要目标”(第16页)。然后,本书深入详细介绍了PB实施的实践以及预期和意外的结果。读者将被邀请踏上穿越13个国家的探索之旅:德国、意大利、瑞典、白俄罗斯、克罗地亚、捷克共和国、匈牙利、波兰、罗马尼亚、俄罗斯、塞尔维亚、斯洛文尼亚和斯洛伐克。正如作者所承认的那样,这些国家仍然是一个“黑盒子”(第21页),在那里几乎不知道任何关于PB发展的情况。作者很自然地将一些国家确定为“老民主国家”(德国、意大利、瑞典),并将它们作为分析中东欧地区PB的基准。他们打开了这个黑盒子,每一章都写着一个国家。该书还提供了在每个国家实施可持续发展计划的原因、实施阶段的信息,并在结尾处陈述了实施和维持可持续发展计划的决策者和其他参与者的成果、接受程度和总体满意度。本书的编辑是中东欧地区内外在地方政府、公共管理和预算创新方面的知名作者。继之前出版的《公共部门基于绩效的预算编制(2019)》一书之后,编辑米歇尔·德弗里斯,
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Slovak Journal of Political Sciences
Slovak Journal of Political Sciences Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Cooperation Between EU and NATO in Response to Hybrid Threats. A Retrospective Analysis from the Institutionalist Perspective Anti-Corruption Attitudes in Post-Communist Slovakia “Hellfire and Deviance” or Political Socialization? Populist Radical Right Parties and the Rhetoric of Emotions. The Slovak Case Study Lilleker, D.; Coman, I. A.; Gregor, M.; Novelli, E. eds. (2021). Political Communication and Covid-19. Governance and Rhetoric in Times of Crisis The Potential of Using Websites for Communication of Political Parties: The Case of Slovakia Before the 2020 Elections
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1