Quantification of food waste in public catering services – A case study from a Swedish municipality

IF 7.1 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL Waste management Pub Date : 2017-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.wasman.2017.01.035
Mattias Eriksson , Christine Persson Osowski , Christopher Malefors , Jesper Björkman , Emelie Eriksson
{"title":"Quantification of food waste in public catering services – A case study from a Swedish municipality","authors":"Mattias Eriksson ,&nbsp;Christine Persson Osowski ,&nbsp;Christopher Malefors ,&nbsp;Jesper Björkman ,&nbsp;Emelie Eriksson","doi":"10.1016/j.wasman.2017.01.035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Food waste is a major problem that must be reduced in order to achieve a sustainable food supply chain. Since food waste valorisation measures, like energy recovery, have limited possibilities to fully recover the resources invested in food production, there is a need to prevent food waste. Prevention is most important at the end of the value chain, where the largest number of sub-processes have already taken place and occur in vain if the food is not used for its intended purpose, i.e. consumption. Catering facilities and households are at the very end of the food supply chain, and in Sweden the public catering sector serves a large number of meals through municipal organisations, including schools, preschools and elderly care homes. Since the first step in waste reduction is to establish a baseline measurement in order to identify problems, this study sought to quantify food waste in schools, preschools and elderly care homes in one municipality in Sweden. The quantification was conducted during three months, spread out over three semesters, and was performed in all 30 public kitchen units in the municipality of Sala. The kitchen staff used kitchen scales to quantify the mass of wasted and served food divided into serving waste (with sub-categories), plate waste and other food waste.</p><p>The food waste level was quantified as 75<!--> <!-->g of food waste per portion served, or 23% of the mass of food served. However, there was great variation between kitchens, with the waste level ranging from 33<!--> <!-->g waste per portion served (13%) to 131<!--> <span>g waste per portion served (34%). Wasted food consisted of 64% serving waste, 33% plate waste and 3% other food waste. Preschools had a lower waste level than schools, possibly due to preschool carers eating together with the children. Kitchens that received warm food prepared in another kitchen (satellite kitchens) had a 42% higher waste level than kitchens preparing all food themselves (production units), possibly due to the latter having higher flexibility in cooking the right amount of food and being able to chill and save surplus food. The large variation between kitchens indicates that they have different causes of food waste, but also different opportunities to reduce it. Detailed waste quantification for each kitchen can therefore be the first step in the process of waste reduction.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":23969,"journal":{"name":"Waste management","volume":"61 ","pages":"Pages 415-422"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.wasman.2017.01.035","citationCount":"123","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Waste management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0956053X17300351","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 123

Abstract

Food waste is a major problem that must be reduced in order to achieve a sustainable food supply chain. Since food waste valorisation measures, like energy recovery, have limited possibilities to fully recover the resources invested in food production, there is a need to prevent food waste. Prevention is most important at the end of the value chain, where the largest number of sub-processes have already taken place and occur in vain if the food is not used for its intended purpose, i.e. consumption. Catering facilities and households are at the very end of the food supply chain, and in Sweden the public catering sector serves a large number of meals through municipal organisations, including schools, preschools and elderly care homes. Since the first step in waste reduction is to establish a baseline measurement in order to identify problems, this study sought to quantify food waste in schools, preschools and elderly care homes in one municipality in Sweden. The quantification was conducted during three months, spread out over three semesters, and was performed in all 30 public kitchen units in the municipality of Sala. The kitchen staff used kitchen scales to quantify the mass of wasted and served food divided into serving waste (with sub-categories), plate waste and other food waste.

The food waste level was quantified as 75 g of food waste per portion served, or 23% of the mass of food served. However, there was great variation between kitchens, with the waste level ranging from 33 g waste per portion served (13%) to 131 g waste per portion served (34%). Wasted food consisted of 64% serving waste, 33% plate waste and 3% other food waste. Preschools had a lower waste level than schools, possibly due to preschool carers eating together with the children. Kitchens that received warm food prepared in another kitchen (satellite kitchens) had a 42% higher waste level than kitchens preparing all food themselves (production units), possibly due to the latter having higher flexibility in cooking the right amount of food and being able to chill and save surplus food. The large variation between kitchens indicates that they have different causes of food waste, but also different opportunities to reduce it. Detailed waste quantification for each kitchen can therefore be the first step in the process of waste reduction.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
公共餐饮服务中食物浪费的量化——来自瑞典市政当局的案例研究
食物浪费是一个必须减少的主要问题,以实现可持续的食物供应链。由于食物浪费的增值措施,如能源回收,完全回收粮食生产中投入的资源的可能性有限,因此有必要防止食物浪费。预防最重要的是在价值链的末端,在那里已经发生了最多的子过程,如果食品没有用于其预期目的,即消费,则发生的子过程是徒劳的。餐饮设施和家庭处于食品供应链的末端,在瑞典,公共餐饮部门通过市政组织(包括学校、幼儿园和养老院)提供大量餐饮。由于减少浪费的第一步是建立基线测量以确定问题,因此本研究试图量化瑞典一个城市的学校、幼儿园和养老院的食物浪费。量化研究历时三个月,分三个学期进行,并在萨拉市所有30个公共厨房单位进行。厨房工作人员使用厨房秤量化浪费和供应的食物的数量,并将其分为服务废物(有子类别),盘子废物和其他食物废物。食物浪费水平被量化为每一份食物浪费75克,或所提供食物质量的23%。然而,不同厨房之间的差异很大,每份食物的垃圾水平从33克(13%)到131克(34%)不等。浪费的食物包括64%的服务浪费,33%的盘子浪费和3%的其他食物浪费。幼儿园的垃圾水平比学校低,可能是因为幼儿园的看护人员和孩子们一起吃饭。接收另一个厨房准备的热食物的厨房(卫星厨房)的浪费水平比自己准备所有食物的厨房(生产单位)高42%,可能是因为后者在烹饪适量食物方面具有更高的灵活性,并且能够冷却和保存多余的食物。厨房之间的巨大差异表明,它们产生食物浪费的原因不同,但减少食物浪费的机会也不同。因此,对每个厨房进行详细的废物量化可以成为减少废物过程的第一步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Waste management
Waste management 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
15.60
自引率
6.20%
发文量
492
审稿时长
39 days
期刊介绍: Waste Management is devoted to the presentation and discussion of information on solid wastes,it covers the entire lifecycle of solid. wastes. Scope: Addresses solid wastes in both industrialized and economically developing countries Covers various types of solid wastes, including: Municipal (e.g., residential, institutional, commercial, light industrial) Agricultural Special (e.g., C and D, healthcare, household hazardous wastes, sewage sludge)
期刊最新文献
Machine learning based prediction of mechanical properties in carbon fiber recovered through pyrolysis. Monitoring litter typology and loading in stormwater: Implications for waste management and mitigation policies Waste–to–waste valorization: Sustainable palladium recovery from real spent catalytic converter leachates using chicken feathers Parametrization of biowaste composting system for life cycle assessment Comparative study on pyrolysis characteristics of common fractions from real municipal solid waste using Py-GC/MS and principal component analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1