Dealing with the Machine: Strategies of Pilots and Doctors Towards Technological Integration

Q2 Arts and Humanities Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society Pub Date : 2021-12-01 DOI:10.1177/02704676211065973
A. Ergur
{"title":"Dealing with the Machine: Strategies of Pilots and Doctors Towards Technological Integration","authors":"A. Ergur","doi":"10.1177/02704676211065973","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As a global and profuse fact, all professions are more or less affected by the rapid penetration of technology in their domain of practice. As the technological capacity progresses, we observe a gradual replacement of human skills by machine-guided procedures. Although such a gradual passage undeniably reduces the human presence in the practice of a profession, the transfer seems not to be a linear process. It has rather a pivoting character, comprising a series of ambivalences and contradictions. Consequently, professionals tend to keep their already acquired knowledge and ability through education and practice, and instead submissively abandon their place to technological tools. From such a perspective, we discuss in this article the strategies of resistance adopted and developed by professionals for keeping their professional power. Among a variety of professions, we choose to focus on medicine and aviation, due to their two fundamental distinctive characteristics: Both have (1) a high degree of technological determination, and (2) accomplishing vital functions. For this purpose, we discuss the strategies of resistance towards technology by professionals, throughout data we gathered from some field research conducted with doctors and pilots.","PeriodicalId":38848,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society","volume":"41 1","pages":"99 - 115"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02704676211065973","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

As a global and profuse fact, all professions are more or less affected by the rapid penetration of technology in their domain of practice. As the technological capacity progresses, we observe a gradual replacement of human skills by machine-guided procedures. Although such a gradual passage undeniably reduces the human presence in the practice of a profession, the transfer seems not to be a linear process. It has rather a pivoting character, comprising a series of ambivalences and contradictions. Consequently, professionals tend to keep their already acquired knowledge and ability through education and practice, and instead submissively abandon their place to technological tools. From such a perspective, we discuss in this article the strategies of resistance adopted and developed by professionals for keeping their professional power. Among a variety of professions, we choose to focus on medicine and aviation, due to their two fundamental distinctive characteristics: Both have (1) a high degree of technological determination, and (2) accomplishing vital functions. For this purpose, we discuss the strategies of resistance towards technology by professionals, throughout data we gathered from some field research conducted with doctors and pilots.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与机器打交道:飞行员和医生的技术整合策略
作为一个全球性和广泛的事实,所有职业都或多或少地受到技术在其实践领域的迅速渗透的影响。随着技术能力的进步,我们观察到机器引导的程序逐渐取代了人类的技能。虽然这种渐进的过渡不可否认地减少了人类在职业实践中的存在,但这种转移似乎不是一个线性过程。它有一个相当重要的特点,包括一系列的矛盾和矛盾。因此,专业人员倾向于通过教育和实践来保持他们已经获得的知识和能力,而不是顺从地放弃他们的位置给技术工具。从这个角度出发,本文探讨了专业人士为保持专业权力而采取和发展的抵抗策略。在众多的职业中,我们选择了医学和航空,因为它们有两个基本的显著特征:它们都有(1)高度的技术决心,(2)完成重要的功能。为此,我们通过与医生和飞行员进行的一些实地研究收集的数据,讨论了专业人员抵制技术的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society
Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society Arts and Humanities-History and Philosophy of Science
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
期刊最新文献
The Cultural Production of Everyday Ethics in Two University STEM Labs Intellectual Virtues and Scientific Endeavor: A Reflection on the Commitments Inherent in Generating and Possessing Knowledge How do Researchers Use Social Media for Science Communication? Designing a Mobile-Messaging App-Based Teachers’ Community of Practice in India Ethics in Science and Technology Policy-Making: A Proposed Normative Framework
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1