Teaching writing: process, practice and policy

IF 0.7 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Changing English-Studies in Culture and Education Pub Date : 2021-12-17 DOI:10.1080/1358684X.2021.2008229
J. Keen
{"title":"Teaching writing: process, practice and policy","authors":"J. Keen","doi":"10.1080/1358684X.2021.2008229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article discusses two schemes for teaching writing in schools. One uses analysis of model texts into techniques and devices then application of these by students to their written compositions and one uses a process approach that includes pre-writing and exploring, drafting, sharing and discussing, revising and celebrating to exploit students’ procedural knowledge of language at all levels of description. It argues that the process approach is more effective in facilitating the development of students’ writing skills than the analysis-and-application methods currently adopted in secondary schools. It concludes that as the process approach is more effective, it will replace analysis-and-application for teaching writing.","PeriodicalId":54156,"journal":{"name":"Changing English-Studies in Culture and Education","volume":"29 1","pages":"24 - 39"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Changing English-Studies in Culture and Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1358684X.2021.2008229","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article discusses two schemes for teaching writing in schools. One uses analysis of model texts into techniques and devices then application of these by students to their written compositions and one uses a process approach that includes pre-writing and exploring, drafting, sharing and discussing, revising and celebrating to exploit students’ procedural knowledge of language at all levels of description. It argues that the process approach is more effective in facilitating the development of students’ writing skills than the analysis-and-application methods currently adopted in secondary schools. It concludes that as the process approach is more effective, it will replace analysis-and-application for teaching writing.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
写作教学:过程、实践与策略
本文讨论了学校写作教学的两种方案。一种是将示范文本分析为技术和手段,然后由学生将其应用于书面作文,另一种是使用过程方法,包括写作前和探索、起草、分享和讨论、修改和庆祝,以利用学生在各个描述层面的语言程序知识。它认为,与目前中学采用的分析和应用方法相比,过程方法在促进学生写作技能发展方面更有效。结论是,随着过程教学法更加有效,它将取代分析和应用于写作教学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Changing English-Studies in Culture and Education
Changing English-Studies in Culture and Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
25.00%
发文量
37
期刊最新文献
From the Derived to the Deviant: A Translation-Based Creative Writing Pedagogy Teaching Fairy Tales Old and New: Revisiting Andersen via Emma Donoghue What Keeps a Narrative going? Teaching Narrative Interest Knowledge and English A Philosophical Enquiry into Subject English and Creative Writing , by Oli Belas, London, Routledge, 2023, 146 pp., Hardback £120; £35.09 (ebook), ISBN 978-0367-48736-2 Students’ Understanding of Role
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1