Measuring psychological need states in sport: Theoretical considerations and a new measure

Nikita Bhavsar, K. Bartholomew, E. Quested, D. Gucciardi, C. Thøgersen‐Ntoumani, J. Reeve, P. Sarrazin, N. Ntoumanis
{"title":"Measuring psychological need states in sport: Theoretical considerations and a new measure","authors":"Nikita Bhavsar, K. Bartholomew, E. Quested, D. Gucciardi, C. Thøgersen‐Ntoumani, J. Reeve, P. Sarrazin, N. Ntoumanis","doi":"10.31234/osf.io/f8gzy","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research guided by Self-determination Theory (Deci & Ryan, 1985; Ryan & Deci, 2017) has repeatedly demonstrated the importance of focusing on both the bright (satisfaction) and dark (frustration) sides of the three basic psychological needs. Recently, researchers have also argued for the utility of assessing a third need state, that of “unfulfillment”. In this paper, we outline an effort to develop and provide initial validity evidence for scores of a new multidimensional and sport-specific measure, the Psychological Need States in Sport-Scale (PNSS-S), to assess the satisfaction, frustration, and unfulfillment of all three needs. In Study 1, we tested evidence for the factorial structure of the responses to the newly developed items, and provided evidence for the internal consistency and discriminant validity of the subscale scores. Factor models incorporating all three need states showed poor fit with the data. However, following post-hoc modifications, a six-factor, 29-item model assessing the need states of satisfaction and frustration, separately for autonomy, competence, and relatedness, was found to have good fit to the data. The model was refined and the factor structure was re-tested using an independent sample of athletes in Study 2. Evidence for the nomological network of the six subscales of the new measure was demonstrated in Study 2, in terms of relations with athletes’ perceptions of their coaches’ interpersonal behaviors, and key motivation-related outcomes. In conclusion, a tripartite conceptualization of the need states was not empirically supported. Nevertheless, , the PNSS-S makes a unique contribution to the sport literature, as it represents the first sport-specific measure of six distinct, yet, correlated states of the satisfaction and frustration of autonomy, competence, and relatedness needs.","PeriodicalId":94181,"journal":{"name":"Psychology of sport and exercise","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"32","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology of sport and exercise","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/f8gzy","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 32

Abstract

Research guided by Self-determination Theory (Deci & Ryan, 1985; Ryan & Deci, 2017) has repeatedly demonstrated the importance of focusing on both the bright (satisfaction) and dark (frustration) sides of the three basic psychological needs. Recently, researchers have also argued for the utility of assessing a third need state, that of “unfulfillment”. In this paper, we outline an effort to develop and provide initial validity evidence for scores of a new multidimensional and sport-specific measure, the Psychological Need States in Sport-Scale (PNSS-S), to assess the satisfaction, frustration, and unfulfillment of all three needs. In Study 1, we tested evidence for the factorial structure of the responses to the newly developed items, and provided evidence for the internal consistency and discriminant validity of the subscale scores. Factor models incorporating all three need states showed poor fit with the data. However, following post-hoc modifications, a six-factor, 29-item model assessing the need states of satisfaction and frustration, separately for autonomy, competence, and relatedness, was found to have good fit to the data. The model was refined and the factor structure was re-tested using an independent sample of athletes in Study 2. Evidence for the nomological network of the six subscales of the new measure was demonstrated in Study 2, in terms of relations with athletes’ perceptions of their coaches’ interpersonal behaviors, and key motivation-related outcomes. In conclusion, a tripartite conceptualization of the need states was not empirically supported. Nevertheless, , the PNSS-S makes a unique contribution to the sport literature, as it represents the first sport-specific measure of six distinct, yet, correlated states of the satisfaction and frustration of autonomy, competence, and relatedness needs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
体育心理需求状态测量的理论思考与新方法
自我决定理论指导下的研究(Deci & Ryan, 1985;Ryan & Deci, 2017)反复证明了关注三个基本心理需求的光明(满足)和黑暗(沮丧)两面的重要性。最近,研究人员还提出了评估第三种需求状态的效用,即“未实现”需求状态。在本文中,我们概述了一项努力,以开发并提供初步有效性证据的分数,一个新的多维的和运动特定的测量,心理需要状态在运动量表(PNSS-S),以评估所有三种需求的满足,挫折和未实现。在研究1中,我们检验了对新开发项目的反应的析因结构的证据,并为子量表得分的内部一致性和区分效度提供了证据。纳入所有三种需求状态的因素模型显示与数据不太吻合。然而,经过事后修改,一个六因素,29项模型评估满意度和挫败感的需求状态,分别为自主性,能力和相关性,被发现有很好的适合数据。在研究2中,我们对模型进行了改进,并使用独立的运动员样本重新测试了因子结构。研究2从运动员对教练人际行为的认知和关键动机相关结果的关系方面证明了新量表的六个分量表的规律网络。总之,需要状态的三方概念化没有经验支持。尽管如此,PNSS-S对体育文献做出了独特的贡献,因为它代表了对自主、能力和相关性需求的满意和沮丧的六种不同但相关的状态的第一个体育特定测量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Within-person associations between daily stress and physical activity during working and non-working hours. Behind the mask: Attentional focus and coping strategies of elite level fencers. Navigating Athlete Development in Elite Sport: Understanding the Barriers to the Provision of Performance Lifestyle Service in England. Expertise Advantage of Automatic Prediction in Visual Motion Representation is Domain-General: A Meta-Analysis. No transfer of 3D-Multiple Object Tracking training on game performance in soccer: A follow-up study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1