Probing the role of reward expectancy in Pavlovian-instrumental transfer

IF 3.5 2区 心理学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences Pub Date : 2021-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.cobeha.2021.04.021
Sean B Ostlund , Andrew T Marshall
{"title":"Probing the role of reward expectancy in Pavlovian-instrumental transfer","authors":"Sean B Ostlund ,&nbsp;Andrew T Marshall","doi":"10.1016/j.cobeha.2021.04.021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Reward-paired cues acquire motivational properties which allow them to invigorate instrumental reward-seeking behavior — termed Pavlovian-instrumental transfer. Somewhat surprisingly, this motivational influence is greatest for cues that serve as unreliable or otherwise weak predictors of reward. In this review, we delve into the ongoing debate about why weak and strong reward-predictive cues differ in their motivational effects. We outline evidence that, when presented with a strong reward predictor, rats exert cognitive control over their motivation to seek out new rewards to allow for efficient reward retrieval, an effect modulated by the expected probability, timing, and magnitude of reward. We also review recent research applying this approach to study how cue-motivated behavior becomes dysregulated in drug addiction and adolescent development.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":56191,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences","volume":"41 ","pages":"Pages 106-113"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.cobeha.2021.04.021","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352154621001078","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Reward-paired cues acquire motivational properties which allow them to invigorate instrumental reward-seeking behavior — termed Pavlovian-instrumental transfer. Somewhat surprisingly, this motivational influence is greatest for cues that serve as unreliable or otherwise weak predictors of reward. In this review, we delve into the ongoing debate about why weak and strong reward-predictive cues differ in their motivational effects. We outline evidence that, when presented with a strong reward predictor, rats exert cognitive control over their motivation to seek out new rewards to allow for efficient reward retrieval, an effect modulated by the expected probability, timing, and magnitude of reward. We also review recent research applying this approach to study how cue-motivated behavior becomes dysregulated in drug addiction and adolescent development.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
报酬预期在巴甫洛夫工具转移中的作用探讨
奖励配对的线索获得动机属性,使它们能够激发工具寻求奖励的行为,称为巴甫洛夫-工具转移。有些令人惊讶的是,这种动机的影响对于那些不可靠的或其他微弱的奖励预测线索来说是最大的。在这篇综述中,我们深入探讨了为什么弱和强奖励预测线索在动机效果上不同的争论。我们概述的证据表明,当提供一个强大的奖励预测器时,大鼠对其寻求新奖励的动机施加认知控制,以允许有效的奖励检索,这种效果由预期的概率、时间和奖励的大小调节。我们还回顾了最近应用这种方法来研究线索动机行为如何在药物成瘾和青少年发展中变得失调的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences
Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences Neuroscience-Cognitive Neuroscience
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
2.00%
发文量
135
期刊介绍: Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences is a systematic, integrative review journal that provides a unique and educational platform for updates on the expanding volume of information published in the field of behavioral sciences.
期刊最新文献
Default heterogeneity: from a singular construct to multiple default network(s) School funding and racist causality: historical and QuantCrit perspectives The Black Mecca as method: a QuantCrit heuristic of Ethnoraciality in the Atlanta Metropolis Five frames for racial equity in elementary science principal decision-making Rethinking cause & consequence in U.S. school funding inequality: a future role for quant crit perspectives
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1