The Occupation of East Baitul Maqdis in the 1967’s Six Days Arab-Israeli War: Re-examining the British’s Reaction and Policy

IF 0.4 0 RELIGION Journal of Al-Tamaddun Pub Date : 2022-06-30 DOI:10.22452/jat.vol17no1.6
M. H. Zakariah
{"title":"The Occupation of East Baitul Maqdis in the 1967’s Six Days Arab-Israeli War: Re-examining the British’s Reaction and Policy","authors":"M. H. Zakariah","doi":"10.22452/jat.vol17no1.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article re-examines the British’s policy and reaction towards the occupation of the East Baitul Maqdis during the Six Days Arab-Israeli War in 1967. As a result of the conflict, the Israelis regime annexed the eastern part of the City which was under the Jordanian’s control since 1948. Subsequently, Tel Aviv launched the process of ‘Israelization’ of the unified Baitul Maqdis by expropriating the Arab’s land and imposing the Israelis culture via education and administration means. Hence, this study will analyse the way London reacted towards the Israelis policy and action by comparing the official proclaimed policy such as the statement voiced by the Foreign Secretary at the parliament and at the United Nations with the actual reactions projected. The question on British’s actual stand is significant and interesting since Britain played an important role after the war such as drafting the UN Resolution 242 which temporarily ended the conflict. The analysis is relied upon mostly the declassified archival documents from the National Archive of the United Kingdom. In the finding, the article concluded that the British was inconsistent between its official policy and the actual reaction: consequently, this brings into question the veracity of equilibrium and impartiality principle of the British government during the Arab- Israeli War of 1967.","PeriodicalId":40895,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Al-Tamaddun","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Al-Tamaddun","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22452/jat.vol17no1.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article re-examines the British’s policy and reaction towards the occupation of the East Baitul Maqdis during the Six Days Arab-Israeli War in 1967. As a result of the conflict, the Israelis regime annexed the eastern part of the City which was under the Jordanian’s control since 1948. Subsequently, Tel Aviv launched the process of ‘Israelization’ of the unified Baitul Maqdis by expropriating the Arab’s land and imposing the Israelis culture via education and administration means. Hence, this study will analyse the way London reacted towards the Israelis policy and action by comparing the official proclaimed policy such as the statement voiced by the Foreign Secretary at the parliament and at the United Nations with the actual reactions projected. The question on British’s actual stand is significant and interesting since Britain played an important role after the war such as drafting the UN Resolution 242 which temporarily ended the conflict. The analysis is relied upon mostly the declassified archival documents from the National Archive of the United Kingdom. In the finding, the article concluded that the British was inconsistent between its official policy and the actual reaction: consequently, this brings into question the veracity of equilibrium and impartiality principle of the British government during the Arab- Israeli War of 1967.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
1967年阿以六日战争中对东拜图尔·马克迪斯的占领:重新审视英国的反应和政策
本文重新审视1967年阿以六日战争中英国对占领东拜图尔马克迪斯的政策和反应。冲突的结果是,以色列政权吞并了自1948年以来在约旦控制下的该市东部。随后,特拉维夫通过征用阿拉伯人的土地,并通过教育和行政手段将以色列文化强加给统一的Baitul Maqdis,启动了“以色列化”进程。因此,本研究将通过比较官方宣布的政策,如外交大臣在议会和联合国发表的声明,与预计的实际反应,分析伦敦对以色列政策和行动的反应方式。由于英国在战后发挥了重要作用,如起草联合国242号决议,暂时结束了冲突,因此英国的实际立场问题非常重要和有趣。该分析主要依赖于英国国家档案馆的解密档案文件。在调查结果中,文章得出结论,英国的官方政策与实际反应不一致:因此,这使1967年阿拉伯-以色列战争期间英国政府的平衡和公正原则的准确性受到质疑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
66.70%
发文量
18
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Ottoman Civilization and Its Impact in Contemporary Malaysia: An Evaluation Goverment Control of Islamic Ideology Movement: A Case of Indonesia Peninggalan Kesultanan Singgora sebagai Warisan Ketamadunan Melayu-Islam di Songkhla, Thailand Selatan The Impact of Television Drama in Understanding History Adab Guru dan Murid dalam Pendidikan Menurut Perspektif Syeikh Muḥammad Khaṭīb Langgien: Analisis terhadap Kitab Dawā’ al-Qulūb min al-‘Uyūb
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1