Widening the conversation: Paramedic involvement in interprofessional care

IF 0.9 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH PROGRESS IN PALLIATIVE CARE Pub Date : 2021-03-04 DOI:10.1080/09699260.2021.1890976
D. Long, B. Lord
{"title":"Widening the conversation: Paramedic involvement in interprofessional care","authors":"D. Long, B. Lord","doi":"10.1080/09699260.2021.1890976","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this special issue of Progress in Palliative Care we explore the nexus between palliative care and paramedicine by presenting important initiatives being undertaken in Australia, New Zealand, the United Kingdom, and Canada to improve access to care. In each of the settings described, paramedics are regulated or registered health care professionals working in health settings that include ambulance or emergency medical services. Paramedics within these regions can be rapidly deployed to provide urgent health care to the entire population of the areas they serve, including areas that are not served by out of hours specialist palliative care. We know that paramedics are involved in care for patients who may be experiencing a health crisis related to a life-limiting condition, and that the call to the emergency service may arise from distressing symptoms such as pain, agitation, respiratory distress, and nausea. Although paramedics can provide symptom relief, paramedic practice has traditionally focussed on the assessment and management of acute injury and illness rather than chronic illness and the care of patients and their carers, particularly at end of life. Previous research found that paramedics perceived that limited exposure to palliative education, lack of practice guidelines that address the needs of palliative care patients, and limited referral options and 24-hour access to specialist advice inhibit their ability to provide safe and effective care for patients in their home, particularly at the end of life. 1 In countries such as Australia, these barriers to care in the community result in most calls relating to a palliative crisis being transferred by ambulance to an emergency department. 2 The contributions to this special issue describe initiatives that involve paramedics and ambulance services planning for care that may include a broader range of management options than the default option of transport to a hospital. It is recognised that patients may experience illness or injury that is unrelated to their palliative condition, and that health emergencies associated with a life-limiting illness may require hospital admission. However, where the patient expresses a preference for care at home or has an advance care directive that describes this preference, every opportunity should be explored to pursue the universal maxim of person-centred care. In order to achieve this Carter and colleagues present the outcome of a national collaborative initiative in Canada that aims to support paramedics in the provision of care in the home, and develop mechanisms to share patient goals of care with other members of the multi-disciplinary healthcare team to ensure that the patient’s wishes are respected. Murphy-Jones and colleagues describe two case reports of UK ambulance service improvement programmes that involved collaboration with a specialist palliative care service to support paramedics and identify appropriate alternatives to hospital conveyance. They discuss the need to educate paramedics in palliative care and examine the development of specialist paramedic roles in end-of-life care. Care pathways are the focus of a report by Helmer and colleagues, who describe the development of a new clinical pathway that aims to improve patientoriented care by enabling paramedics to provide care for patients in their own home, potentially reducing the requirement for transfer to an emergency department. Conversations about the need for advance care directives are often difficult to initiate, and as such, Goodwin et al. sought to identify paramedics’ views on their involvement in proactive identification of patients in their final stage of life and the initiation of conversations regarding advance care planning in the United Kingdom. Both Anderson and Cameron, together with their colleagues, remind us that paramedics are often present at the time of death of a patient and that support of carers and family members at this time is a vital professional responsibility, yet paramedics may not be well supported or prepared for this role. This may include decisions to withhold or withdraw resuscitation. These reports recommend engagement","PeriodicalId":45106,"journal":{"name":"PROGRESS IN PALLIATIVE CARE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/09699260.2021.1890976","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PROGRESS IN PALLIATIVE CARE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09699260.2021.1890976","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

In this special issue of Progress in Palliative Care we explore the nexus between palliative care and paramedicine by presenting important initiatives being undertaken in Australia, New Zealand, the United Kingdom, and Canada to improve access to care. In each of the settings described, paramedics are regulated or registered health care professionals working in health settings that include ambulance or emergency medical services. Paramedics within these regions can be rapidly deployed to provide urgent health care to the entire population of the areas they serve, including areas that are not served by out of hours specialist palliative care. We know that paramedics are involved in care for patients who may be experiencing a health crisis related to a life-limiting condition, and that the call to the emergency service may arise from distressing symptoms such as pain, agitation, respiratory distress, and nausea. Although paramedics can provide symptom relief, paramedic practice has traditionally focussed on the assessment and management of acute injury and illness rather than chronic illness and the care of patients and their carers, particularly at end of life. Previous research found that paramedics perceived that limited exposure to palliative education, lack of practice guidelines that address the needs of palliative care patients, and limited referral options and 24-hour access to specialist advice inhibit their ability to provide safe and effective care for patients in their home, particularly at the end of life. 1 In countries such as Australia, these barriers to care in the community result in most calls relating to a palliative crisis being transferred by ambulance to an emergency department. 2 The contributions to this special issue describe initiatives that involve paramedics and ambulance services planning for care that may include a broader range of management options than the default option of transport to a hospital. It is recognised that patients may experience illness or injury that is unrelated to their palliative condition, and that health emergencies associated with a life-limiting illness may require hospital admission. However, where the patient expresses a preference for care at home or has an advance care directive that describes this preference, every opportunity should be explored to pursue the universal maxim of person-centred care. In order to achieve this Carter and colleagues present the outcome of a national collaborative initiative in Canada that aims to support paramedics in the provision of care in the home, and develop mechanisms to share patient goals of care with other members of the multi-disciplinary healthcare team to ensure that the patient’s wishes are respected. Murphy-Jones and colleagues describe two case reports of UK ambulance service improvement programmes that involved collaboration with a specialist palliative care service to support paramedics and identify appropriate alternatives to hospital conveyance. They discuss the need to educate paramedics in palliative care and examine the development of specialist paramedic roles in end-of-life care. Care pathways are the focus of a report by Helmer and colleagues, who describe the development of a new clinical pathway that aims to improve patientoriented care by enabling paramedics to provide care for patients in their own home, potentially reducing the requirement for transfer to an emergency department. Conversations about the need for advance care directives are often difficult to initiate, and as such, Goodwin et al. sought to identify paramedics’ views on their involvement in proactive identification of patients in their final stage of life and the initiation of conversations regarding advance care planning in the United Kingdom. Both Anderson and Cameron, together with their colleagues, remind us that paramedics are often present at the time of death of a patient and that support of carers and family members at this time is a vital professional responsibility, yet paramedics may not be well supported or prepared for this role. This may include decisions to withhold or withdraw resuscitation. These reports recommend engagement
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
扩大对话:护理人员参与跨专业护理
在本期《姑息治疗进展》特刊中,我们通过介绍澳大利亚、新西兰、英国和加拿大为改善护理可及性而采取的重要举措,探讨姑息治疗和辅助医学之间的联系。在所述的每一种环境中,护理人员都是在包括救护车或紧急医疗服务在内的卫生环境中工作的受管制或注册的卫生保健专业人员。可以迅速部署这些地区的护理人员,为其服务地区的全体人口提供紧急保健,包括那些没有非工作时间专业姑息治疗服务的地区。我们知道,护理人员参与照顾那些可能正在经历与限制生命的疾病有关的健康危机的病人,并且呼叫紧急服务可能是由于痛苦的症状,如疼痛、激动、呼吸困难和恶心。虽然护理人员可以提供症状缓解,但护理人员的实践传统上侧重于急性损伤和疾病的评估和管理,而不是慢性疾病和患者及其护理人员的护理,特别是在生命结束时。先前的研究发现,护理人员认为,接受姑息治疗教育的机会有限,缺乏针对姑息治疗患者需求的实践指南,转诊选择有限,无法24小时获得专家建议,这些都抑制了他们在家中为患者提供安全有效护理的能力,尤其是在生命末期。在澳大利亚等国家,社区护理的这些障碍导致大多数与缓和危机有关的电话被救护车转到急诊室。2本特刊的投稿描述了涉及护理护理人员和救护车服务的倡议,这些倡议的护理规划可能包括比运送到医院这一默认选择范围更广的管理选择。人们认识到,患者可能会遇到与其姑息条件无关的疾病或伤害,并且与限制生命的疾病相关的卫生紧急情况可能需要住院。然而,如果患者表达了对家庭护理的偏好或有描述这种偏好的预先护理指示,则应探索每一个机会来追求以人为本的护理的普遍准则。为了实现这一目标,Carter和他的同事们提出了加拿大国家合作倡议的结果,该倡议旨在支持护理人员在家中提供护理,并建立机制,与多学科医疗团队的其他成员分享患者的护理目标,以确保患者的愿望得到尊重。Murphy-Jones及其同事描述了英国救护车服务改进计划的两个案例报告,其中涉及与专业姑息治疗服务机构合作,以支持护理人员并确定医院运输的适当替代方案。他们讨论了在临终关怀中教育护理人员的必要性,并研究了临终关怀中专科护理人员角色的发展。护理路径是Helmer及其同事的一份报告的重点,他们描述了一种新的临床路径的发展,旨在通过使护理人员能够在自己家中为患者提供护理,从而改善以患者为导向的护理,从而潜在地减少转到急诊室的需求。关于预先护理指示的必要性的对话通常很难启动,因此,Goodwin等人试图确定护理人员对他们参与患者生命最后阶段的主动识别以及在英国启动关于预先护理计划的对话的看法。安德森和卡梅隆以及他们的同事提醒我们,护理人员经常在病人死亡时在场,在这个时候,护理人员和家庭成员的支持是一项至关重要的职业责任,但护理人员可能没有得到很好的支持,也没有为这一角色做好准备。这可能包括决定暂停或撤销复苏。这些报告建议参与
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
PROGRESS IN PALLIATIVE CARE
PROGRESS IN PALLIATIVE CARE PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
11.80%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: Progress in Palliative Care is a peer reviewed, multidisciplinary journal with an international perspective. It provides a central point of reference for all members of the palliative care community: medical consultants, nurses, hospital support teams, home care teams, hospice directors and administrators, pain centre staff, social workers, chaplains, counsellors, information staff, paramedical staff and self-help groups. The emphasis of the journal is on the rapid exchange of information amongst those working in palliative care. Progress in Palliative Care embraces all aspects of the management of the problems of end-stage disease.
期刊最新文献
The impact of COVID-19 and community services on palliative care unit admissions: A retrospective cohort study A qualitative evidence synthesis exploring the attitudes, beliefs and values of the long-term care workforce towards palliative care Evidence-based physiotherapy interventions: evaluation of current practice in a palliative care service Feasibility and economic benefits of community-based palliative care in regional Australia: A case study with cost analysis Exploring the competency and confidence levels of physiotherapists in the management of patients diagnosed with life-limiting illnesses
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1