The relationship between R&D subsidy and R&D cooperation in eco-innovative companies. An analysis taking a complementarity approach

IF 7.1 3区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS European Research on Management and Business Economics Pub Date : 2021-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.iedeen.2021.100170
Manuel Guisado-González , María del Mar Rodríguez-Domínguez , Mercedes Vila-Alonso , Encarnación González-Vázquez
{"title":"The relationship between R&D subsidy and R&D cooperation in eco-innovative companies. An analysis taking a complementarity approach","authors":"Manuel Guisado-González ,&nbsp;María del Mar Rodríguez-Domínguez ,&nbsp;Mercedes Vila-Alonso ,&nbsp;Encarnación González-Vázquez","doi":"10.1016/j.iedeen.2021.100170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We analyze whether eco-innovation has a positive or negative influence on the business performance of companies and, through the complementarity approach, whether the joint implementation of R&amp;D subsidy and R&amp;D cooperation increases or decreases the sum of their respective individual impacts on the business performance. If the joint implementation is substitutive, business performance will be lower than potentially possible, so granting R&amp;D subsidies under the condition of establishing R&amp;D cooperation would not be an adequate policy to promote eco-innovation. The analyses were performed using data from the Technological Innovation Panel (PITEC) of 2013 for Spanish manufacturing companies. Our findings indicate that an eco-innovation-oriented strategy positively affects the labor productivity of companies and that receiving public aid as a consequence of establishing R&amp;D cooperation agreements has a lower effect on labor productivity (non-eco-innovative companies), or the same effect (eco-innovative companies), compared to the sum of the individual impacts of R&amp;D cooperation and R&amp;D subsidy. Consequently, in non-eco-innovative companies the use of subsidized R&amp;D cooperation is inadvisable, while their use in eco-innovative companies is neutral.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45796,"journal":{"name":"European Research on Management and Business Economics","volume":"27 3","pages":"Article 100170"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2444883421000292/pdfft?md5=c659f1349345b79fb589a83ccddd3dd9&pid=1-s2.0-S2444883421000292-main.pdf","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Research on Management and Business Economics","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2444883421000292","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

We analyze whether eco-innovation has a positive or negative influence on the business performance of companies and, through the complementarity approach, whether the joint implementation of R&D subsidy and R&D cooperation increases or decreases the sum of their respective individual impacts on the business performance. If the joint implementation is substitutive, business performance will be lower than potentially possible, so granting R&D subsidies under the condition of establishing R&D cooperation would not be an adequate policy to promote eco-innovation. The analyses were performed using data from the Technological Innovation Panel (PITEC) of 2013 for Spanish manufacturing companies. Our findings indicate that an eco-innovation-oriented strategy positively affects the labor productivity of companies and that receiving public aid as a consequence of establishing R&D cooperation agreements has a lower effect on labor productivity (non-eco-innovative companies), or the same effect (eco-innovative companies), compared to the sum of the individual impacts of R&D cooperation and R&D subsidy. Consequently, in non-eco-innovative companies the use of subsidized R&D cooperation is inadvisable, while their use in eco-innovative companies is neutral.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
生态创新企业研发补贴与研发合作的关系。采用互补方法的分析
我们分析了生态创新对企业经营绩效的影响是积极的还是消极的,并通过互补的方法分析了研发补贴和研发合作的联合实施对企业经营绩效的影响是增加还是减少了各自个体影响的总和。如果联合实施是替代的,企业绩效将低于潜在的可能,因此在建立研发合作的情况下给予研发补贴并不是促进生态创新的适当政策。分析使用了2013年西班牙制造公司的技术创新小组(PITEC)的数据。我们的研究结果表明,与研发合作和研发补贴的个体影响之和相比,生态创新战略对企业的劳动生产率产生了积极的影响,而建立研发合作协议后接受公共援助对劳动生产率的影响(非生态创新企业)较低,对生态创新企业的影响相同。因此,在非生态创新公司中,补贴研发合作是不可取的,而在生态创新公司中,补贴研发合作是中性的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
3.40%
发文量
30
审稿时长
50 weeks
期刊介绍: European Research on Management and Business Economics (ERMBE) was born in 1995 as Investigaciones Europeas de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa (IEDEE). The journal is published by the European Academy of Management and Business Economics (AEDEM) under this new title since 2016, it was indexed in SCOPUS in 2012 and in Thomson Reuters Emerging Sources Citation Index in 2015. From the beginning, the aim of the Journal is to foster academic research by publishing original research articles that meet the highest analytical standards, and provide new insights that contribute and spread the business management knowledge
期刊最新文献
Board gender diversity and employee productivity. The moderating role of female leaders The impact of government legitimacy on the tourism industry during crises How to enhance the entrepreneurial intentions of the young population in rural areas: An approach from personal values and the socioeconomic environment Effects of ethical leadership on individual learning and unlearning: Mediation through affective commitment Market orientation, integrated marketing communications, and small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) performance: A comparison between developed and developing economies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1