Overconfidence among solo entrepreneurs: the role of national culture

J. Cieślik, E. Nolan, Martha O'Hagan‐Luff, Andre J. van Stel
{"title":"Overconfidence among solo entrepreneurs: the role of national culture","authors":"J. Cieślik, E. Nolan, Martha O'Hagan‐Luff, Andre J. van Stel","doi":"10.1108/jsbed-08-2022-0361","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis study investigates entrepreneurial overconfidence (EOC) levels among solo entrepreneurs at the country level. Although transitions from solo to employer entrepreneur are relatively rare, the solo self-employed have become an important source of potential job creation by virtue of the sharp increase in their numbers in the past two decades. When EOC levels are too high, job creation ambitions may be unrealistic and unrealised. Unrealised ambitions and business failure can lead not only to psychological and financial costs for the individual entrepreneurs involved, but at the societal level also to wasted government resources, and increased costs for the entrepreneurial ecosystem as a whole. Therefore, it is important to know more about the entrepreneurial overconfidence levels of solo entrepreneurs in different countries and their determinants.Design/methodology/approachUsing Global Entrepreneurship Monitor data for 71 countries over the period 2013–2016, the authors construct a new measure of entrepreneurial overconfidence of solo entrepreneurs and relate this to three recently developed indicators of national culture.FindingsThe findings indicate that EOC levels are positively related to Joy (versus Duty), and negatively related to Trust (versus Distrust). Finally, no significant relationship between entrepreneurial overconfidence and Individualism is found in the study (versus Collectivism).Research limitations/implicationsGiven the lack of literature examining the relationship between EOC levels and cultural variables hypotheses were developed using the existent body of knowledge in the area, which is at the early stage of development. The hypotheses derivation has used mostly theoretical arguments relating to the link between national culture and overconfidence of entrepreneurs in general, rather than relating specifically to solo entrepreneurs. The measure of EOC uses expectations of employment growth to proxy overconfidence, but other measures of entrepreneurial success may also be explored.Practical implicationsAs the hiring of employees can be a costly process (Coad et al., 2017), it is important that entrepreneurs have realistic expectations of what it requires to hire employees. This is especially the case for solo entrepreneurs since they do not have experience of hiring their own employees. This paper addresses such issues at an aggregate level by exploring what factors explain country differences in overconfidence levels of solo entrepreneurs.Social implicationsIt is worthwhile to distinguish between solo and employer entrepreneurs when studying their EOC levels, as the ambitions of these two types of entrepreneurs are different. Empirically, this study introduces a new measure of EOC tailored towards the solo self-employed.Originality/valueThis study contributes to entrepreneurship literature by expanding current knowledge on entrepreneurial overconfidence at the country level. Past research has studied EOC at the individual level, however limited research exists on the phenomenon of EOC from a country level perspective. This is important as unrealised entrepreneurial ambitions may not only create substantial costs for the individual entrepreneurs involved, it may also lead to substantial societal costs, including waste of government resources.","PeriodicalId":51453,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jsbed-08-2022-0361","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThis study investigates entrepreneurial overconfidence (EOC) levels among solo entrepreneurs at the country level. Although transitions from solo to employer entrepreneur are relatively rare, the solo self-employed have become an important source of potential job creation by virtue of the sharp increase in their numbers in the past two decades. When EOC levels are too high, job creation ambitions may be unrealistic and unrealised. Unrealised ambitions and business failure can lead not only to psychological and financial costs for the individual entrepreneurs involved, but at the societal level also to wasted government resources, and increased costs for the entrepreneurial ecosystem as a whole. Therefore, it is important to know more about the entrepreneurial overconfidence levels of solo entrepreneurs in different countries and their determinants.Design/methodology/approachUsing Global Entrepreneurship Monitor data for 71 countries over the period 2013–2016, the authors construct a new measure of entrepreneurial overconfidence of solo entrepreneurs and relate this to three recently developed indicators of national culture.FindingsThe findings indicate that EOC levels are positively related to Joy (versus Duty), and negatively related to Trust (versus Distrust). Finally, no significant relationship between entrepreneurial overconfidence and Individualism is found in the study (versus Collectivism).Research limitations/implicationsGiven the lack of literature examining the relationship between EOC levels and cultural variables hypotheses were developed using the existent body of knowledge in the area, which is at the early stage of development. The hypotheses derivation has used mostly theoretical arguments relating to the link between national culture and overconfidence of entrepreneurs in general, rather than relating specifically to solo entrepreneurs. The measure of EOC uses expectations of employment growth to proxy overconfidence, but other measures of entrepreneurial success may also be explored.Practical implicationsAs the hiring of employees can be a costly process (Coad et al., 2017), it is important that entrepreneurs have realistic expectations of what it requires to hire employees. This is especially the case for solo entrepreneurs since they do not have experience of hiring their own employees. This paper addresses such issues at an aggregate level by exploring what factors explain country differences in overconfidence levels of solo entrepreneurs.Social implicationsIt is worthwhile to distinguish between solo and employer entrepreneurs when studying their EOC levels, as the ambitions of these two types of entrepreneurs are different. Empirically, this study introduces a new measure of EOC tailored towards the solo self-employed.Originality/valueThis study contributes to entrepreneurship literature by expanding current knowledge on entrepreneurial overconfidence at the country level. Past research has studied EOC at the individual level, however limited research exists on the phenomenon of EOC from a country level perspective. This is important as unrealised entrepreneurial ambitions may not only create substantial costs for the individual entrepreneurs involved, it may also lead to substantial societal costs, including waste of government resources.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
个体企业家的过度自信:民族文化的作用
目的本研究在国家层面调查个体创业者的创业过度自信水平。尽管从个体经营者向雇主企业家的转变相对罕见,但由于过去20年中个体经营者的数量急剧增加,个体经营者已成为潜在就业机会的重要来源。当平机会水平过高时,创造就业机会的雄心可能不切实际,也无法实现。未实现的雄心和商业失败不仅会导致相关企业家个人的心理和财务成本,还会在社会层面浪费政府资源,并增加整个创业生态系统的成本。因此,重要的是要更多地了解不同国家个体企业家的创业过度自信水平及其决定因素。设计/方法/方法利用2013-2016年期间71个国家的《全球创业监测》数据,作者构建了一个新的衡量个体企业家创业过度自信的指标,并将其与最近制定的三个国家文化指标联系起来。调查结果表明,平机会水平与快乐(与责任)呈正相关,与信任(与不信任)负相关。最后,在研究中没有发现企业家过度自信与个人主义之间的显著关系(与集体主义相比)。研究的局限性/含义鉴于缺乏研究EOC水平与文化变量之间关系的文献,利用该领域现有的知识体系提出了假设,该领域处于发展的早期阶段。假设推导主要使用了与民族文化和企业家过度自信之间的联系有关的理论论点,而不是专门与个体企业家有关。EOC的衡量标准使用对就业增长的预期来代表过度自信,但也可以探索创业成功的其他衡量标准。实际含义由于雇佣员工可能是一个成本高昂的过程(Coad et al.,2017),企业家对雇佣员工的要求有现实的期望是很重要的。这种情况对于个体创业者尤其如此,因为他们没有雇佣自己员工的经验。本文通过探讨是什么因素解释了各国个体企业家过度自信水平的差异,在总体层面上解决了这些问题。社会含义在研究个人创业者和雇主创业者的EOC水平时,有必要区分他们,因为这两类创业者的抱负不同。从经验上讲,本研究引入了一种针对个体自雇者的新的EOC测量方法。独创性/价值本研究通过在国家层面扩大当前对创业过度自信的了解,为创业文献做出了贡献。以往的研究都是从个人层面研究平机会,但从国家层面对平机会现象的研究有限。这一点很重要,因为未实现的创业雄心不仅可能给相关企业家个人带来巨大成本,还可能导致巨大的社会成本,包括浪费政府资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
6.50%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: ■Research in SMEs, entrepreneurship and family-run businesses ■Case studies on real-life small business experiences ■Small Business growth and successful enterprises ■Practical advice from small business advisors ■Recruitment, training and development for SMEs ■Performance measurement and business improvement ■Government initiatives and enterprise policy ■SME financing and venture capital. By encouraging debate on the key issues facing SMEs, the journal offers detailed analysis and critical assessment of current best practice, discusses the implications of latest research findings and explores opportunities to break down the barriers that restrict the growth of SMEs.
期刊最新文献
University student entrepreneurial intentions: the effects of perceived institutional support, parental role models, and entrepreneurial self-efficacy Entrepreneurship mentoring in higher education: how does the mentor benefit? How do social enterprises respond operationally to conflicting demands? A resource-based view Husbands and wives: power, peril and female participation in a Ugandan coffee cooperative The importance of team diversity in initial coin offerings (ICO) success
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1