Patterns of relational aggression, narcissism, and self-esteem: Adolescents’ social goals unraveled

IF 1.7 3区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL School Psychology International Pub Date : 2023-02-09 DOI:10.1177/01430343231154738
Ioanna Voulgaridou, Constantinos M. Kokkinos, K. Fanti
{"title":"Patterns of relational aggression, narcissism, and self-esteem: Adolescents’ social goals unraveled","authors":"Ioanna Voulgaridou, Constantinos M. Kokkinos, K. Fanti","doi":"10.1177/01430343231154738","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study applies latent profile analysis to identify profiles of adolescents differentiated on levels of relational aggression (RAgg), self-esteem, and narcissism. To understand the social aspects of these profiles within the adolescent peer context, we compare them to their reported social goals of dominance, popularity, and intimacy. Greek junior high school students ( N = 2,207), selected via random stratified cluster sampling, aged 13–16 ( M = 14.04, SD =.81), completed a self-report survey. Based on self-esteem, narcissism, and RAgg scores, four groups emerged: the group with the lowest scores in RAgg, narcissism, and self-esteem (“low risk”), the group with the highest scores in RAgg, narcissism, and self-esteem (“relational aggressors with narcissistic self-esteem”), the group with moderate scores in RAgg, narcissism, and self-esteem (“moderate risk”), and the group with high RAgg and narcissism scores but low self-esteem (“relational aggressors with vulnerable self-esteem”). Relational aggressors with high narcissism and self-esteem scored higher on social goals than those with vulnerable self-esteem (high narcissism but low self-esteem). Preventive policies should replace excessive and unconditional praise with more realistic self-esteem sources and teach adolescents how to respond to negative feedback and to cope with ego threats or social placement concerns.","PeriodicalId":47723,"journal":{"name":"School Psychology International","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"School Psychology International","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01430343231154738","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This study applies latent profile analysis to identify profiles of adolescents differentiated on levels of relational aggression (RAgg), self-esteem, and narcissism. To understand the social aspects of these profiles within the adolescent peer context, we compare them to their reported social goals of dominance, popularity, and intimacy. Greek junior high school students ( N = 2,207), selected via random stratified cluster sampling, aged 13–16 ( M = 14.04, SD =.81), completed a self-report survey. Based on self-esteem, narcissism, and RAgg scores, four groups emerged: the group with the lowest scores in RAgg, narcissism, and self-esteem (“low risk”), the group with the highest scores in RAgg, narcissism, and self-esteem (“relational aggressors with narcissistic self-esteem”), the group with moderate scores in RAgg, narcissism, and self-esteem (“moderate risk”), and the group with high RAgg and narcissism scores but low self-esteem (“relational aggressors with vulnerable self-esteem”). Relational aggressors with high narcissism and self-esteem scored higher on social goals than those with vulnerable self-esteem (high narcissism but low self-esteem). Preventive policies should replace excessive and unconditional praise with more realistic self-esteem sources and teach adolescents how to respond to negative feedback and to cope with ego threats or social placement concerns.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关系攻击、自恋和自尊的模式:青少年的社会目标被解开
本研究运用潜在侧面分析方法,对关系攻击、自尊、自恋等不同水平的青少年进行侧面分析。为了理解青少年同伴背景下这些个人资料的社会方面,我们将其与他们报告的社会目标(支配地位、受欢迎程度和亲密程度)进行比较。采用随机分层整群抽样的方法,选取13-16岁的希腊初中生2207名(M = 14.04, SD = 0.81)进行自我报告调查。根据自尊、自恋和RAgg得分,出现了四个组:RAgg、自恋和自尊得分最低的组(“低风险”),RAgg、自恋和自尊得分最高的组(“自恋自尊的关系攻击者”),RAgg、自恋和自尊得分中等的组(“中等风险”),RAgg和自恋得分高但自尊低的组(“脆弱自尊的关系攻击者”)。高自恋和高自尊的关系攻击者在社会目标上的得分高于脆弱自尊者(高自恋但低自尊)。预防性政策应以更现实的自尊来源取代过度和无条件的赞扬,并教导青少年如何对消极反馈作出反应,如何处理自我威胁或社会安置问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
School Psychology International
School Psychology International PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
8.70%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: The official publication of the ISPA. School Psychology International highlights the concerns of those who provide quality mental health, educational, therapeutic and support services to schools and their communities throughout the world. The Journal publishes a wide range of original empirical research, cross-cultural replications of promising procedures and descriptions of technology transfer
期刊最新文献
“It takes a village”: An ecological analysis of social and emotional learning environments in Malawi Provision of educational psychological services under a high inflationary environment in Masvingo Province, Zimbabwe The role of teachers’ social and emotional competence in implementing social and emotional learning (SEL) curriculum in Malawi Botho/Ubuntu paradigm as cognitive justice in psychology School psychologists’ training to support inclusive education in Portugal: Trainers’ perspectives of opportunities, challenges, and improvements
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1