The Procedure for the Creation of New Regional States under the FDRE Constitution: Some Overlooked Issues

Q4 Social Sciences Mizan Law Review Pub Date : 2020-01-07 DOI:10.4314/mlr.v13i1.4
T. Belay, H. Belay
{"title":"The Procedure for the Creation of New Regional States under the FDRE Constitution: Some Overlooked Issues","authors":"T. Belay, H. Belay","doi":"10.4314/mlr.v13i1.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Ethiopian Federation which was created by the 1995 Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia (FDRE) Constitution had nine member states and one city administration. Apart from the creation of Dire Dawa as a city administration, no new state has been introduced in the Ethiopian federation since the adoption of the Constitution. However, several ethnic-based Zonal administrations in the country’s Southern Nations, Nationalities and Peoples (SNNP) region are now demanding to form their own regional states. Apparently, the demands are justified under Article 47(2) of the 1995 Ethiopian constitution which follows a purely ethnic-centered approach by giving “each nation, nationality and people” living in the nine States of the federation “the right to establish their own States at any time.” However, since this right has so far never been exercised in practice, the new demands are creating anxiety in some quarters and drawing a growing attention to the constitutional procedure for the creation of new states. This article aims to critically examine the relevant constitutional provisions dealing with the issue of creation of new states. Drawing insights from some other federations, we argue that the ethnic-centered approach taken under the FDRE Constitution for the creation of new states overlooks several important issues such as economic viability, administrative efficiency, equity, sustainable peace, and resilience of the federal system. Key terms: Creation of new states · Ethnic federalism · Self-determination · Nation, Nationality or People (NNP)","PeriodicalId":30178,"journal":{"name":"Mizan Law Review","volume":"13 1","pages":"91-122"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4314/mlr.v13i1.4","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mizan Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/mlr.v13i1.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Ethiopian Federation which was created by the 1995 Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia (FDRE) Constitution had nine member states and one city administration. Apart from the creation of Dire Dawa as a city administration, no new state has been introduced in the Ethiopian federation since the adoption of the Constitution. However, several ethnic-based Zonal administrations in the country’s Southern Nations, Nationalities and Peoples (SNNP) region are now demanding to form their own regional states. Apparently, the demands are justified under Article 47(2) of the 1995 Ethiopian constitution which follows a purely ethnic-centered approach by giving “each nation, nationality and people” living in the nine States of the federation “the right to establish their own States at any time.” However, since this right has so far never been exercised in practice, the new demands are creating anxiety in some quarters and drawing a growing attention to the constitutional procedure for the creation of new states. This article aims to critically examine the relevant constitutional provisions dealing with the issue of creation of new states. Drawing insights from some other federations, we argue that the ethnic-centered approach taken under the FDRE Constitution for the creation of new states overlooks several important issues such as economic viability, administrative efficiency, equity, sustainable peace, and resilience of the federal system. Key terms: Creation of new states · Ethnic federalism · Self-determination · Nation, Nationality or People (NNP)
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
德意志民主共和国宪法下新区域国家的建立程序:一些被忽视的问题
埃塞俄比亚联邦由1995年的《埃塞俄比亚联邦民主共和国宪法》(FDRE)创建,有九个成员国和一个市政府。除了设立迪勒达瓦作为一个城市行政之外,自宪法通过以来,埃塞俄比亚联邦没有引入任何新的州。然而,该国南部民族和民族(SNNP)地区的几个以民族为基础的地方政府现在要求组建自己的地区国家。显然,根据1995年埃塞俄比亚宪法第47(2)条,这些要求是合理的,该宪法遵循一种纯粹以种族为中心的办法,规定生活在联邦九个州的“每个民族、民族和人民”“有权随时建立自己的国家”。然而,由于这项权利迄今从未在实践中得到行使,新的要求在某些方面引起了焦虑,并使人们越来越注意建立新国家的宪法程序。本文旨在批判性地审视处理建立新国家问题的相关宪法条款。借鉴其他联邦的经验,我们认为联邦宪法中以种族为中心的方法忽略了几个重要的问题,如经济可行性、行政效率、公平、可持续和平和联邦制度的弹性。关键词:建国·民族联邦制·民族自决·民族、民族或人民(NNP)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Effect of Formalization of Rural Women’s Land Rights in a Plural Justice System: The Case of the Sidama Regional State Concurrence of Crimes under Ethiopian Law: General Principles vis-à-vis Tax Law Regulation of Group of Companies in Ethiopia: A Comparative Overview Private Security Companies in Ethiopia: An Insight from a Rights Perspective Business and Human Rights in Ethiopia: The Status of the Law and the Practice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1