Kinesiotherapy in chronic back pain and combined tension type headache

A. A. Golovacheva, V. Golovacheva
{"title":"Kinesiotherapy in chronic back pain and combined tension type headache","authors":"A. A. Golovacheva, V. Golovacheva","doi":"10.30629/2658-7947-2023-28-3-61-68","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Kinesiotherapy is eff ective in the treatment of chronic nonspecific back pain (CNBP), but its eff ectiveness in tensiontype headache (TTH) is unclear. The effectiveness of kinesiotherapy in patients with CNBP and comorbid TTH has been little studied.The aim of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of kinesiotherapy in patients with CNBS and comorbid TTH. Patients and methods. 52 patients (22 men and 30 women, mean age 32.4 ± 7.5 years) with CNBP and combined TTH were included in the study. All patients received standard treatment, of which 28 patients received kinesiotherapy (Group 1) and 24 patients were included in the comparison group (Group 2). All patients used pain diaries. All patients were tested by using the Beck Anxiety Inventory, the Beck’s Depression Inventory, the Pain Catastrophization Scale, the Kinesiophobia Scale, the Oswestry Disability Index, the Roland–Morris Disability Questionnaire, the Headache Impact Test 6, numerical pain rating scale before treatment and 3, 6 months after treatment. Clinical effcacy was assessed by reducing the frequency and intensity of headache (by ≥ 50%), back pain (by ≥ 30%), and by increasing functional activity during the day (by ≥ 30%).Results. At 6 months follow-up signifiantly more patients in group 1 than in group 2 achieved a clinical effect on TTH and CNBP: 78.5% (n = 22) compared to 41.7% (n = 10); OR (95% CI) = 1.99. In 9 patients (32%) of group 1, a complete remission of TTH and CNBP was noted, in group 2 there were no such patients. At 6 months follow-up group 1 showed a significant improvement (p < 0.05) in comparison with group 2 in terms of functional activity and emotional state.Conclusion. Kinesiotherapy for CNBP and combined TTH is effective both for back pain and headache. It increases functional activity and improves the emotional state of patients.","PeriodicalId":36724,"journal":{"name":"Russian Neurological Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Russian Neurological Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30629/2658-7947-2023-28-3-61-68","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Kinesiotherapy is eff ective in the treatment of chronic nonspecific back pain (CNBP), but its eff ectiveness in tensiontype headache (TTH) is unclear. The effectiveness of kinesiotherapy in patients with CNBP and comorbid TTH has been little studied.The aim of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of kinesiotherapy in patients with CNBS and comorbid TTH. Patients and methods. 52 patients (22 men and 30 women, mean age 32.4 ± 7.5 years) with CNBP and combined TTH were included in the study. All patients received standard treatment, of which 28 patients received kinesiotherapy (Group 1) and 24 patients were included in the comparison group (Group 2). All patients used pain diaries. All patients were tested by using the Beck Anxiety Inventory, the Beck’s Depression Inventory, the Pain Catastrophization Scale, the Kinesiophobia Scale, the Oswestry Disability Index, the Roland–Morris Disability Questionnaire, the Headache Impact Test 6, numerical pain rating scale before treatment and 3, 6 months after treatment. Clinical effcacy was assessed by reducing the frequency and intensity of headache (by ≥ 50%), back pain (by ≥ 30%), and by increasing functional activity during the day (by ≥ 30%).Results. At 6 months follow-up signifiantly more patients in group 1 than in group 2 achieved a clinical effect on TTH and CNBP: 78.5% (n = 22) compared to 41.7% (n = 10); OR (95% CI) = 1.99. In 9 patients (32%) of group 1, a complete remission of TTH and CNBP was noted, in group 2 there were no such patients. At 6 months follow-up group 1 showed a significant improvement (p < 0.05) in comparison with group 2 in terms of functional activity and emotional state.Conclusion. Kinesiotherapy for CNBP and combined TTH is effective both for back pain and headache. It increases functional activity and improves the emotional state of patients.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
运动疗法治疗慢性背痛和合并紧张性头痛
运动疗法是有效的治疗慢性非特异性背痛(CNBP),但其有效性在紧张性头痛(TTH)尚不清楚。运动疗法对CNBP合并TTH患者的疗效研究甚少。该研究的目的是评估运动疗法对CNBS合并TTH患者的有效性。患者和方法。纳入52例CNBP合并TTH患者(男22例,女30例,平均年龄32.4±7.5岁)。所有患者均接受标准治疗,其中28例患者接受运动疗法(第一组),24例患者作为对照组(第二组)。所有患者均使用疼痛日记。所有患者在治疗前和治疗后3、6个月分别采用Beck焦虑量表、Beck抑郁量表、疼痛灾难化量表、运动恐惧症量表、Oswestry残疾指数、Roland-Morris残疾问卷、头痛影响测试6、数值疼痛评定量表进行测试。临床疗效通过减少头痛的频率和强度(≥50%)、背部疼痛(≥30%)和增加白天的功能活动(≥30%)来评估。在6个月的随访中,1组患者TTH和CNBP的临床疗效显著高于2组:78.5% (n = 22)对41.7% (n = 10);或(95% ci) = 1.99。1组9例患者(32%)TTH和CNBP完全缓解,2组无此类患者。随访6个月时,组1在功能活动和情绪状态方面较组2有显著改善(p < 0.05)。运动疗法治疗CNBP和联合TTH对背痛和头痛都有效。它增加了患者的功能活动,改善了患者的情绪状态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Russian Neurological Journal
Russian Neurological Journal Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
期刊最新文献
100 years since the birth of Professor M.Ya. Berdichevsky Variability of alternating hemiplegia in children Outcomes of epilepsy surgery in patients with diffuse gliomas of the brain Specific features of actual infectious diseases in postpandemic period Immunological status of patients in the acute period of ischemic stroke
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1