Strategy as a Political Phenomenon and Concept

V. Belozerov
{"title":"Strategy as a Political Phenomenon and Concept","authors":"V. Belozerov","doi":"10.22363/2313-1438-2023-25-2-368-376","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Modern science doesn’t sufficiently disclose the essence and content of strategy (political strategy), even though the term and its derivatives actively circulate in theoretical and political discourse. This highlights the necessity to establish terminological clarity regarding the understanding of strategy. This article reveals the genesis of strategy as a practical management activity and as a science, as well as shows its connection with the military sphere. For a long time, the development of strategy as a science was closely connected to military affairs. The political component in strategy appeared in the 19th century, and has been gradually expanding. To separate political strategy from military and give it an independent scientific status, various authors have attempted to develop such concepts as higher strategy, grand strategy, and state strategy. Throughout time two approaches to understanding strategy emerged: the first focuses mainly on goal-setting, and the second - on coordinating goals with the ways and resources required to achieve them. According to the author, strategy in politics means a purposeful and long-term action program implemented to achieve a designed result. Military strategy acts not only as the highest level of military art, but also as an integral component of state strategy. At the turn of the 2010s attempts were made to conceptualize political strategy, but they did not find further development. The generation of a full-fledged concept of political strategy seems to be heuristic and promising in both theoretical and practical domains.","PeriodicalId":32346,"journal":{"name":"RUDN Journal of Political Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RUDN Journal of Political Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-1438-2023-25-2-368-376","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Modern science doesn’t sufficiently disclose the essence and content of strategy (political strategy), even though the term and its derivatives actively circulate in theoretical and political discourse. This highlights the necessity to establish terminological clarity regarding the understanding of strategy. This article reveals the genesis of strategy as a practical management activity and as a science, as well as shows its connection with the military sphere. For a long time, the development of strategy as a science was closely connected to military affairs. The political component in strategy appeared in the 19th century, and has been gradually expanding. To separate political strategy from military and give it an independent scientific status, various authors have attempted to develop such concepts as higher strategy, grand strategy, and state strategy. Throughout time two approaches to understanding strategy emerged: the first focuses mainly on goal-setting, and the second - on coordinating goals with the ways and resources required to achieve them. According to the author, strategy in politics means a purposeful and long-term action program implemented to achieve a designed result. Military strategy acts not only as the highest level of military art, but also as an integral component of state strategy. At the turn of the 2010s attempts were made to conceptualize political strategy, but they did not find further development. The generation of a full-fledged concept of political strategy seems to be heuristic and promising in both theoretical and practical domains.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
战略作为一种政治现象和政治概念
现代科学没有充分揭示战略(政治战略)的本质和内容,尽管这一术语及其衍生词在理论和政治话语中活跃地流通。这突出了在理解战略方面建立术语清晰度的必要性。本文揭示了战略作为一种实践管理活动和一门科学的起源,以及它与军事领域的联系。长期以来,战略作为一门科学的发展与军事密切相关。战略中的政治成分出现于19世纪,并逐渐扩大。为了将政治战略与军事战略区分开来,赋予其独立的科学地位,许多学者都试图发展出高级战略、大战略和国家战略等概念。长期以来,出现了两种理解战略的方法:第一种主要侧重于目标设定,第二种侧重于协调目标与实现目标所需的方法和资源。在作者看来,政治上的战略是指为达到既定结果而实施的有目的的长期行动计划。军事战略是军事艺术的最高境界,也是国家战略的重要组成部分。在2010年代初,人们试图将政治战略概念化,但没有找到进一步的发展。产生一个成熟的政治战略概念似乎在理论和实践领域都是启发式的和有前途的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Political Administration VS Political Competition Under Neo-Authoritarian Rule Political Theology of Contingency: Reading Materialists with Carl Schmitt New dilemmas of the «just war» theory Integration of Migrants Through the Lens of a Constructivist Approach to Ethnicity Political Science in Search of New Approaches: Introducing the Issue
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1