Major Events in the Recent Past in Assembly Speeches and the Authenticity of [Andocides] On the Peace

Tekmeria Pub Date : 2021-10-26 DOI:10.12681/TEKMERIA.28450
E. Harris
{"title":"Major Events in the Recent Past in Assembly Speeches and the Authenticity of [Andocides] On the Peace","authors":"E. Harris","doi":"10.12681/TEKMERIA.28450","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper begins by demonstrating that speakers in the Assembly did not misrepresent major events in recent history. An examination of Demosthenes’ speeches to the Assembly shows that his statements about recent events are accurate but are usually brief. This is true for speeches to the Assembly found in Thucydides and Xennophon. The main part of the essay shows that the speech On the Peace attributed to Andocides makes major mistakes about recent events (such as the walls and fleet of Athens, peace between the Boeotians and the Spartans, Athenian control over Euboea, peace with Persia, etc.). The speech also does not conform to the rhetorical conventions of the Assembly (naming one’s ancestors, giving lengthy accounts of past events), contains statements about presbeis autokratores which are inconsistent with the evidence for this institution in Classical Greece and uses the term spondai in a way unparalleled in classical sources. All this evidence shows that the speech is not a genuine work of Andocides but a forgery composed in the Hellenistic or Roman period.","PeriodicalId":30095,"journal":{"name":"Tekmeria","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tekmeria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12681/TEKMERIA.28450","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This paper begins by demonstrating that speakers in the Assembly did not misrepresent major events in recent history. An examination of Demosthenes’ speeches to the Assembly shows that his statements about recent events are accurate but are usually brief. This is true for speeches to the Assembly found in Thucydides and Xennophon. The main part of the essay shows that the speech On the Peace attributed to Andocides makes major mistakes about recent events (such as the walls and fleet of Athens, peace between the Boeotians and the Spartans, Athenian control over Euboea, peace with Persia, etc.). The speech also does not conform to the rhetorical conventions of the Assembly (naming one’s ancestors, giving lengthy accounts of past events), contains statements about presbeis autokratores which are inconsistent with the evidence for this institution in Classical Greece and uses the term spondai in a way unparalleled in classical sources. All this evidence shows that the speech is not a genuine work of Andocides but a forgery composed in the Hellenistic or Roman period.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
近期大会演讲中的重大事件与《论和平》的真实性
本文首先证明大会的发言者没有歪曲近代历史上的重大事件。对德摩斯梯尼在大会上的演讲的考察表明,他对最近事件的陈述是准确的,但通常是简短的。修昔底德和色诺芬在大会上的发言就是如此。文章的主要部分表明,安多西提斯的演讲《论和平》对最近发生的事件(如雅典的城墙和舰队、波奥提亚人和斯巴达人之间的和平、雅典对伊波亚的控制、与波斯的和平等)犯了重大错误。这篇演讲也不符合议会的修辞惯例(说出自己的祖先,冗长地叙述过去的事件),包含了关于presbeis autokratores的陈述,这与古典希腊这一机构的证据不一致,并且以一种古典资料中无与伦比的方式使用了“spondai”一词。所有这些证据都表明,这篇演讲不是安西提斯的真迹,而是希腊化或罗马时期的伪造作品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Deconstructing a Prussian Myth: The Athenian Standards Decree (IG I3 1453a-g) Μια νέα ερμηνεία ενός γκράφιτι από υστερορωμαϊκή οικία της αρχαίας Ελεύθερνας Ionic Art and Script in Archaic Macedonia: Origin(s), Medium(s), Effect(s) Ionic Art and Script in Archaic Macedonia: Origin(s), Medium(s), Effect(s) “Tomb of the Philosophers” in Pella, Macedonia Revisited: New Findings on Its Iconography
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1