Quantitative Approaches for Causality Assessment of Adverse Events Following Immunisation for COVID-19 Vaccines

S. Teo
{"title":"Quantitative Approaches for Causality Assessment of Adverse Events Following Immunisation for COVID-19 Vaccines","authors":"S. Teo","doi":"10.52547/vacres.8.1.73","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Vaccine safety surveillance is important to identify and manage adverse events following immunisation (AEFI) and avoid vaccine hesitancy. Currently, COVID-19 vaccines are administered to large numbers of people to try and curb the pandemic. In this paper, quantitative methods for causality assessment of AEFI are described. Qualitative methods for causality assessment involve an expert panel reviewing each AEFI report to determine whether the AEFI can be attributed to the vaccine. Each AEFI is determined to be classified as consistent, inconsistent, indeterminate or unclassifiable in terms of causality. Quantitative approaches can strengthen causality assessment outcomes. However, the potential for bias and errors should be considered for each safety signal identified. Vaccine and population specific factors may affect AEFI incidence, with a need to obtain background rates to frame safety signals identified into the local context. Several case scenarios from the vaccine safety surveillance in Brunei are used to illustrate the practical application of quantitative approaches for AEFI causality assessment (including comparison of AESI incidence to background rates and disproportionality analysis), which complement the traditional qualitative methods.","PeriodicalId":52727,"journal":{"name":"Vaccine Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vaccine Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52547/vacres.8.1.73","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Vaccine safety surveillance is important to identify and manage adverse events following immunisation (AEFI) and avoid vaccine hesitancy. Currently, COVID-19 vaccines are administered to large numbers of people to try and curb the pandemic. In this paper, quantitative methods for causality assessment of AEFI are described. Qualitative methods for causality assessment involve an expert panel reviewing each AEFI report to determine whether the AEFI can be attributed to the vaccine. Each AEFI is determined to be classified as consistent, inconsistent, indeterminate or unclassifiable in terms of causality. Quantitative approaches can strengthen causality assessment outcomes. However, the potential for bias and errors should be considered for each safety signal identified. Vaccine and population specific factors may affect AEFI incidence, with a need to obtain background rates to frame safety signals identified into the local context. Several case scenarios from the vaccine safety surveillance in Brunei are used to illustrate the practical application of quantitative approaches for AEFI causality assessment (including comparison of AESI incidence to background rates and disproportionality analysis), which complement the traditional qualitative methods.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19疫苗免疫后不良事件因果关系评估的定量方法
疫苗安全性监测对于识别和管理免疫后的不良事件(AEFI)以及避免疫苗犹豫非常重要。目前,新冠肺炎疫苗被大量接种,以试图遏制疫情。本文介绍了AEFI因果关系评估的定量方法。因果关系评估的定性方法包括由专家小组审查每份AEFI报告,以确定AEFI是否可归因于疫苗。根据因果关系,每个AEFI被确定为一致、不一致、不确定或不可分类。定量方法可以加强因果关系评估结果。然而,对于每个确定的安全信号,应考虑潜在的偏差和误差。疫苗和人群特异性因素可能会影响AEFI的发病率,需要获得背景发病率,以将确定的安全信号纳入当地环境。使用文莱疫苗安全性监测的几个案例场景来说明AEFI因果关系评估的定量方法的实际应用(包括AESI发病率与背景发病率的比较和不均衡性分析),这是对传统定性方法的补充。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Vaccine Innovation for Dengue, Chikungunya, Zika and Yellow Fever: Accelerating Global Development Agenda and Partnerships in Post-COVID Era Immunoinformatics Approach for Designing an HPV Epitope-Based Vaccine Candidate Harboring Built-in Adjuvants The predominance of Newcastle disease virus genotype VII: genome diversity or poor cross-immunity of non-matched vaccines Commentary on Corneal Graft Rejection after COVID-19 Vaccination: Our Experience and Concerns The Healthcare Workers’ Vaccination – current Policy and Recommendations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1