A morphological analysis of Brexitism

IF 3.8 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS New Political Economy Pub Date : 2022-11-21 DOI:10.1080/13563467.2022.2147495
Samuel Marlow-Stevens
{"title":"A morphological analysis of Brexitism","authors":"Samuel Marlow-Stevens","doi":"10.1080/13563467.2022.2147495","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Despite a burgeoning literature on the topic, Brexit has not yet been the subject of a comprehensive ideological analysis. Through morphological analysis we establish an understanding of the concepts and ideas which underpin Brexit’s ideological structure and situate the political event and its aftermath firmly within a political economy context, as a response to the 2008 financial crash. Brexitism is a permutation of Conservatism which seeks to protect the interests of capital by maintaining a ‘state of exception’ characterised by instability and crisis. Political support is mobilised by way of a relentless pursuit of destructive change and innovation combined with a deindividualising concept of sovereignty. Thatcherism’s market justice gives way to a more inequitable and arbitrary concept, manifested in Johnson’s ‘levelling up’ agenda, which legitimises the sustained instability. Traditional Conservative rationality and respect for authority are necessarily eschewed in favour of stronger but more rigid emotional ties. While politically efficacious, Brexitism is inherently unstable and volatile, predicated on a contradiction between the promise of liberty and the maintenance of instability and uncertainty. Without the easy invocation of the ‘EU menace’ the fate of Johnson’s levelling up agenda will decide the longevity of this particular ideological iteration of British Conservatism.","PeriodicalId":51447,"journal":{"name":"New Political Economy","volume":"28 1","pages":"539 - 553"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Political Economy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2022.2147495","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Despite a burgeoning literature on the topic, Brexit has not yet been the subject of a comprehensive ideological analysis. Through morphological analysis we establish an understanding of the concepts and ideas which underpin Brexit’s ideological structure and situate the political event and its aftermath firmly within a political economy context, as a response to the 2008 financial crash. Brexitism is a permutation of Conservatism which seeks to protect the interests of capital by maintaining a ‘state of exception’ characterised by instability and crisis. Political support is mobilised by way of a relentless pursuit of destructive change and innovation combined with a deindividualising concept of sovereignty. Thatcherism’s market justice gives way to a more inequitable and arbitrary concept, manifested in Johnson’s ‘levelling up’ agenda, which legitimises the sustained instability. Traditional Conservative rationality and respect for authority are necessarily eschewed in favour of stronger but more rigid emotional ties. While politically efficacious, Brexitism is inherently unstable and volatile, predicated on a contradiction between the promise of liberty and the maintenance of instability and uncertainty. Without the easy invocation of the ‘EU menace’ the fate of Johnson’s levelling up agenda will decide the longevity of this particular ideological iteration of British Conservatism.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
英国脱欧主义的形态学分析
尽管关于英国脱欧的文献越来越多,但它还没有成为一个全面的意识形态分析的主题。通过形态分析,我们建立了对支撑英国脱欧意识形态结构的概念和思想的理解,并将政治事件及其后果牢固地置于政治经济背景下,作为对2008年金融危机的回应。英国脱欧主义是保守主义的一种变体,它试图通过维持以不稳定和危机为特征的“例外状态”来保护资本的利益。通过对破坏性变革和创新的不懈追求,加上去个体化的主权概念,政治支持得以动员起来。撒切尔主义的市场正义让位于一个更加不公平和武断的概念,体现在约翰逊的“升级”议程中,这使持续的不稳定合法化。传统的保守理性和对权威的尊重必然会被摒弃,取而代之的是更强大但更严格的情感纽带。尽管在政治上有效,但英国退欧主义本质上是不稳定和不稳定的,其基础是承诺自由与维持不稳定和不确定性之间的矛盾。如果不轻易援引“欧盟威胁”,约翰逊提升议程的命运将决定英国保守主义这一特定意识形态迭代的寿命。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
9.50%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: New Political Economy aims to create a forum for work which combines the breadth of vision which characterised the classical political economy of the nineteenth century with the analytical advances of twentieth century social science. It seeks to represent the terrain of political economy scholarship across different disciplines, emphasising original and innovative work which explores new approaches and methodologies, and addresses core debates and issues of historical and contemporary relevance.
期刊最新文献
Varieties of central banking: the Nordic Model beyond a fiscal-centric approach Understanding power, culture and institutional change: a revised approach to political settlements analysis The ecological currency hierarchy: empirical support for currency power driven asymmetries in environmental and social autonomy Towards a degrowth transition: bringing interests back in Rentier capitalism, social reproduction, and the limits of liberalism: mapping gendered asset value in Kuwait
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1