Hawks, Robots, and Chalkings: Unexpected Object Encounters During Walking Interviews on a College Campus

IF 0.7 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Educational Research for Social Change Pub Date : 2019-04-01 DOI:10.17159/2221-4070/2018/V8I1A8
Maureen A. Flint
{"title":"Hawks, Robots, and Chalkings: Unexpected Object Encounters During Walking Interviews on a College Campus","authors":"Maureen A. Flint","doi":"10.17159/2221-4070/2018/V8I1A8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A feeding hawk, a sculpture of a fallen robot, and chalk markings pointing to a slave cemetery—each of these objects was unexpectedly encountered during walking interviews on a college campus. This article explores these object encounters in turn as provocations toward the potential for walking as a method to generate interventions in the reproduction of hegemonic spaces. Specifically, this paper takes up the Deleuzoguattarian concepts of the rhizome and the assemblage to explore how the practice of walking makes possible creative and imaginative explorations in the relationship between objects and place. Methodologically, walking produces the possibility for affirmative difference in the interview, a positive embrace of reading objects as complex and connected through an embodied enactment of rhizomes and assemblages. Inquiry that thinks with rhizomes and assemblages connects disparate encounters, moments, and objects through affirmative difference, embracing connections and relations. This article suggests implications for how the walking interview might engender reflective entanglements of theory and methodology, resist extractive methods, as well as produce imaginative reconceptualisations of place, and interventions and disruptions of hegemonic narratives.","PeriodicalId":43084,"journal":{"name":"Educational Research for Social Change","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Research for Social Change","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17159/2221-4070/2018/V8I1A8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

A feeding hawk, a sculpture of a fallen robot, and chalk markings pointing to a slave cemetery—each of these objects was unexpectedly encountered during walking interviews on a college campus. This article explores these object encounters in turn as provocations toward the potential for walking as a method to generate interventions in the reproduction of hegemonic spaces. Specifically, this paper takes up the Deleuzoguattarian concepts of the rhizome and the assemblage to explore how the practice of walking makes possible creative and imaginative explorations in the relationship between objects and place. Methodologically, walking produces the possibility for affirmative difference in the interview, a positive embrace of reading objects as complex and connected through an embodied enactment of rhizomes and assemblages. Inquiry that thinks with rhizomes and assemblages connects disparate encounters, moments, and objects through affirmative difference, embracing connections and relations. This article suggests implications for how the walking interview might engender reflective entanglements of theory and methodology, resist extractive methods, as well as produce imaginative reconceptualisations of place, and interventions and disruptions of hegemonic narratives.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
鹰、机器人和粉笔:大学校园徒步面试中的意外物体
一只喂食的鹰,一个倒下的机器人的雕塑,以及指向奴隶墓地的粉笔标记——这些物体中的每一个都是在大学校园的步行采访中意外遇到的。本文探讨了这些物体相遇反过来作为对步行潜力的挑衅,作为一种在霸权空间再现中产生干预的方法。具体而言,本文采用了德勒古关于根茎和集合的概念,探讨步行实践如何在物体和地点之间的关系中进行创造性和富有想象力的探索。从方法论上讲,步行产生了在采访中产生肯定差异的可能性,通过根状茎和组合的具体表现,积极拥抱复杂和相连的阅读对象。用根茎和组合思考的探究通过肯定的差异,包括联系和关系,将不同的遭遇、时刻和物体联系起来。这篇文章暗示了步行采访如何产生理论和方法论的反思纠缠,抵制提取方法,以及产生对地点的富有想象力的重新概念化,以及对霸权叙事的干预和破坏。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Educational Research for Social Change
Educational Research for Social Change EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
20.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Humanising Online Teaching and Learning in the BEd. Foundation Phase Programme: Moving Beyond Covid-19 Grade 4 Rural Learners' Views and Learning Experiences That Address Social Justice in Postapartheid South Africa Democracy and Inclusive Education Policy in Post-1994 South African Schools: Goal, Tension, and Struggle Reflecting on Teaching in the Higher Education Context During the Covid-19 Era: A Collaborative Self-Study Project Lessons Learnt From Facilitating Action Learning With Youth Facing Multiple Adversities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1